The ret variable in mtk_hdmi_pll_calc() was used unitialized as reported
by the kernel test robot.
Fix the issue by removing the variable altogether and testing out the
return value of mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw()
Fixes: 45810d486bb44 ("phy: mediatek: add support for phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@baylibre.com>
---
drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
index abfc077fb0a8..e10da6c4147e 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
u64 tmds_clk, pixel_clk, da_hdmitx21_ref_ck, ns_hdmipll_ck, pcw;
u8 txpredivs[4] = { 2, 4, 6, 12 };
u32 fbkdiv_low;
- int i, ret;
+ int i;
pixel_clk = rate;
tmds_clk = pixel_clk;
@@ -292,10 +292,9 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
if (!(digital_div <= 32 && digital_div >= 1))
return -EINVAL;
- mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
+ if (mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
PLL_FBKDIV_HS3, posdiv1, posdiv2, txprediv,
- txposdiv, digital_div);
- if (ret)
+ txposdiv, digital_div))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
--
2.39.2
Il 13/04/23 14:46, Guillaume Ranquet ha scritto:
> The ret variable in mtk_hdmi_pll_calc() was used unitialized as reported
> by the kernel test robot.
>
> Fix the issue by removing the variable altogether and testing out the
> return value of mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw()
>
> Fixes: 45810d486bb44 ("phy: mediatek: add support for phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
> index abfc077fb0a8..e10da6c4147e 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
> u64 tmds_clk, pixel_clk, da_hdmitx21_ref_ck, ns_hdmipll_ck, pcw;
> u8 txpredivs[4] = { 2, 4, 6, 12 };
> u32 fbkdiv_low;
> - int i, ret;
> + int i;
>
> pixel_clk = rate;
> tmds_clk = pixel_clk;
> @@ -292,10 +292,9 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
> if (!(digital_div <= 32 && digital_div >= 1))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
> + if (mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
> PLL_FBKDIV_HS3, posdiv1, posdiv2, txprediv,
> - txposdiv, digital_div);
> - if (ret)
> + txposdiv, digital_div))
> return -EINVAL;
>
I don't get why we're returning -EINVAL unconditionally in the first place, here.
Function mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw() should return zero or a negative error number: in
that case, the previous *intention* was fine, so this should be
ret = mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(....)
if (ret)
return ret;
return 0;
Regards,
Angelo
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:31, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>Il 13/04/23 14:46, Guillaume Ranquet ha scritto:
>> The ret variable in mtk_hdmi_pll_calc() was used unitialized as reported
>> by the kernel test robot.
>>
>> Fix the issue by removing the variable altogether and testing out the
>> return value of mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw()
>>
>> Fixes: 45810d486bb44 ("phy: mediatek: add support for phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c | 7 +++----
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
>> index abfc077fb0a8..e10da6c4147e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-hdmi-mt8195.c
>> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
>> u64 tmds_clk, pixel_clk, da_hdmitx21_ref_ck, ns_hdmipll_ck, pcw;
>> u8 txpredivs[4] = { 2, 4, 6, 12 };
>> u32 fbkdiv_low;
>> - int i, ret;
>> + int i;
>>
>> pixel_clk = rate;
>> tmds_clk = pixel_clk;
>> @@ -292,10 +292,9 @@ static int mtk_hdmi_pll_calc(struct mtk_hdmi_phy *hdmi_phy, struct clk_hw *hw,
>> if (!(digital_div <= 32 && digital_div >= 1))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
>> + if (mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(hw, PLL_PREDIV, fbkdiv_high, fbkdiv_low,
>> PLL_FBKDIV_HS3, posdiv1, posdiv2, txprediv,
>> - txposdiv, digital_div);
>> - if (ret)
>> + txposdiv, digital_div))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>
>I don't get why we're returning -EINVAL unconditionally in the first place, here.
>
>Function mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw() should return zero or a negative error number: in
>that case, the previous *intention* was fine, so this should be
>
Hi Angelo,
I was maybe a bit too quick on fixing this that way.
Anyway it doesn't change a thing as mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw() eitheir
returns 0 or -EINVAL.
But I agree that the logic is dubious and propagating the return value
is the right thing
to do.
I see that Arnd and Tom posted versions that you might prefer:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20230414075842.4006164-1-arnd@kernel.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-phy/20230414122253.3171524-1-trix@redhat.com/
Thx,
Guillaume.
> ret = mtk_hdmi_pll_set_hw(....)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> return 0;
>
>
>Regards,
>Angelo
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.