1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. [PATCH RFC net-next v4 0/8] virtio/vsock: support datagrams
  4. View patch

[PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable

Bobby Eshleman posted 8 patches 2 years, 8 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
Posted by Bobby Eshleman 2 years, 8 months ago 
This commit makes the bind table management functions in vsock usable
for different bind tables. For use by datagrams in a future patch.

Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index ef86765f3765..7a3ca4270446 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -230,11 +230,12 @@ static void __vsock_remove_connected(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
 	sock_put(&vsk->sk);
 }
 
-static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
+struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
+					    struct list_head *bind_table)
 {
 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(vsk, vsock_bound_sockets(addr), bound_table) {
+	list_for_each_entry(vsk, bind_table, bound_table) {
 		if (vsock_addr_equals_addr(addr, &vsk->local_addr))
 			return sk_vsock(vsk);
 
@@ -247,6 +248,11 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
+{
+	return vsock_find_bound_socket_common(addr, vsock_bound_sockets(addr));
+}
+
 static struct sock *__vsock_find_connected_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *src,
 						  struct sockaddr_vm *dst)
 {
@@ -646,12 +652,17 @@ static void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work)
 
 /**** SOCKET OPERATIONS ****/
 
-static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
-				    struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
+static int vsock_bind_common(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
+			     struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
+			     struct list_head *bind_table,
+			     size_t table_size)
 {
 	static u32 port;
 	struct sockaddr_vm new_addr;
 
+	if (table_size < VSOCK_HASH_SIZE)
+		return -1;
+
 	if (!port)
 		port = get_random_u32_above(LAST_RESERVED_PORT);
 
@@ -667,7 +678,8 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 
 			new_addr.svm_port = port++;
 
-			if (!__vsock_find_bound_socket(&new_addr)) {
+			if (!vsock_find_bound_socket_common(&new_addr,
+							    &bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(addr)])) {
 				found = true;
 				break;
 			}
@@ -684,7 +696,8 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
 
-		if (__vsock_find_bound_socket(&new_addr))
+		if (vsock_find_bound_socket_common(&new_addr,
+						   &bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(addr)]))
 			return -EADDRINUSE;
 	}
 
@@ -696,11 +709,17 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 	 * by AF_UNIX.
 	 */
 	__vsock_remove_bound(vsk);
-	__vsock_insert_bound(vsock_bound_sockets(&vsk->local_addr), vsk);
+	__vsock_insert_bound(&bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(&vsk->local_addr)], vsk);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
+				    struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
+{
+	return vsock_bind_common(vsk, addr, vsock_bind_table, VSOCK_HASH_SIZE + 1);
+}
+
 static int __vsock_bind_dgram(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
 			      struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
 {

-- 
2.30.2
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
Posted by Stefano Garzarella 2 years, 7 months ago 
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:58:31AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>This commit makes the bind table management functions in vsock usable
>for different bind tables. For use by datagrams in a future patch.
>
>Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index ef86765f3765..7a3ca4270446 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -230,11 +230,12 @@ static void __vsock_remove_connected(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> 	sock_put(&vsk->sk);
> }
>
>-static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>+struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
>+					    struct list_head *bind_table)
> {
> 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
>
>-	list_for_each_entry(vsk, vsock_bound_sockets(addr), bound_table) {
>+	list_for_each_entry(vsk, bind_table, bound_table) {
> 		if (vsock_addr_equals_addr(addr, &vsk->local_addr))
> 			return sk_vsock(vsk);
>
>@@ -247,6 +248,11 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> 	return NULL;
> }
>
>+static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>+{
>+	return vsock_find_bound_socket_common(addr, vsock_bound_sockets(addr));
>+}
>+
> static struct sock *__vsock_find_connected_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *src,
> 						  struct sockaddr_vm *dst)
> {
>@@ -646,12 +652,17 @@ static void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> /**** SOCKET OPERATIONS ****/
>
>-static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>-				    struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>+static int vsock_bind_common(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>+			     struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
>+			     struct list_head *bind_table,
>+			     size_t table_size)
> {
> 	static u32 port;
> 	struct sockaddr_vm new_addr;
>
>+	if (table_size < VSOCK_HASH_SIZE)
>+		return -1;

Why we need this check now?

>+
> 	if (!port)
> 		port = get_random_u32_above(LAST_RESERVED_PORT);
>
>@@ -667,7 +678,8 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>
> 			new_addr.svm_port = port++;
>
>-			if (!__vsock_find_bound_socket(&new_addr)) {
>+			if (!vsock_find_bound_socket_common(&new_addr,
>+							    &bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(addr)])) {
> 				found = true;
> 				break;
> 			}
>@@ -684,7 +696,8 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 			return -EACCES;
> 		}
>
>-		if (__vsock_find_bound_socket(&new_addr))
>+		if (vsock_find_bound_socket_common(&new_addr,
>+						   &bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(addr)]))
> 			return -EADDRINUSE;
> 	}
>
>@@ -696,11 +709,17 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	 * by AF_UNIX.
> 	 */
> 	__vsock_remove_bound(vsk);
>-	__vsock_insert_bound(vsock_bound_sockets(&vsk->local_addr), vsk);
>+	__vsock_insert_bound(&bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(&vsk->local_addr)], vsk);
>
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>+static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>+				    struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>+{
>+	return vsock_bind_common(vsk, addr, vsock_bind_table, VSOCK_HASH_SIZE + 1);
>+}
>+
> static int __vsock_bind_dgram(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 			      struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> {
>
>-- 
>2.30.2
>

The rest seems okay to me, but I agree with Simon's suggestion.

Stefano
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
Posted by Bobby Eshleman 2 years, 7 months ago 
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:25:55PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:58:31AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > This commit makes the bind table management functions in vsock usable
> > for different bind tables. For use by datagrams in a future patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
> > ---
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > index ef86765f3765..7a3ca4270446 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > @@ -230,11 +230,12 @@ static void __vsock_remove_connected(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> > 	sock_put(&vsk->sk);
> > }
> > 
> > -static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > +struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
> > +					    struct list_head *bind_table)
> > {
> > 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> > 
> > -	list_for_each_entry(vsk, vsock_bound_sockets(addr), bound_table) {
> > +	list_for_each_entry(vsk, bind_table, bound_table) {
> > 		if (vsock_addr_equals_addr(addr, &vsk->local_addr))
> > 			return sk_vsock(vsk);
> > 
> > @@ -247,6 +248,11 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > 	return NULL;
> > }
> > 
> > +static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > +{
> > +	return vsock_find_bound_socket_common(addr, vsock_bound_sockets(addr));
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct sock *__vsock_find_connected_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *src,
> > 						  struct sockaddr_vm *dst)
> > {
> > @@ -646,12 +652,17 @@ static void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > 
> > /**** SOCKET OPERATIONS ****/
> > 
> > -static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > -				    struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > +static int vsock_bind_common(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > +			     struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
> > +			     struct list_head *bind_table,
> > +			     size_t table_size)
> > {
> > 	static u32 port;
> > 	struct sockaddr_vm new_addr;
> > 
> > +	if (table_size < VSOCK_HASH_SIZE)
> > +		return -1;
> 
> Why we need this check now?
> 

If the table_size is not at least VSOCK_HASH_SIZE then the
VSOCK_HASH(addr) used later could overflow the table.

Maybe this really deserves a WARN() and a comment?

> > +
> > 	if (!port)
> > 		port = get_random_u32_above(LAST_RESERVED_PORT);
> > 
> > @@ -667,7 +678,8 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 
> > 			new_addr.svm_port = port++;
> > 
> > -			if (!__vsock_find_bound_socket(&new_addr)) {
> > +			if (!vsock_find_bound_socket_common(&new_addr,
> > +							    &bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(addr)])) {
> > 				found = true;
> > 				break;
> > 			}
> > @@ -684,7 +696,8 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 			return -EACCES;
> > 		}
> > 
> > -		if (__vsock_find_bound_socket(&new_addr))
> > +		if (vsock_find_bound_socket_common(&new_addr,
> > +						   &bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(addr)]))
> > 			return -EADDRINUSE;
> > 	}
> > 
> > @@ -696,11 +709,17 @@ static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 	 * by AF_UNIX.
> > 	 */
> > 	__vsock_remove_bound(vsk);
> > -	__vsock_insert_bound(vsock_bound_sockets(&vsk->local_addr), vsk);
> > +	__vsock_insert_bound(&bind_table[VSOCK_HASH(&vsk->local_addr)], vsk);
> > 
> > 	return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > +static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > +				    struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > +{
> > +	return vsock_bind_common(vsk, addr, vsock_bind_table, VSOCK_HASH_SIZE + 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __vsock_bind_dgram(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 			      struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > {
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.30.2
> > 
> 
> The rest seems okay to me, but I agree with Simon's suggestion.
> 
> Stefano
> 

Thanks,
Bobby
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
Posted by Stefano Garzarella 2 years, 7 months ago 
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:05:43PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:25:55PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:58:31AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> > This commit makes the bind table management functions in vsock usable
>> > for different bind tables. For use by datagrams in a future patch.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
>> > ---
>> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> > index ef86765f3765..7a3ca4270446 100644
>> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> > @@ -230,11 +230,12 @@ static void __vsock_remove_connected(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>> > 	sock_put(&vsk->sk);
>> > }
>> >
>> > -static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>> > +struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
>> > +					    struct list_head *bind_table)
>> > {
>> > 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
>> >
>> > -	list_for_each_entry(vsk, vsock_bound_sockets(addr), bound_table) {
>> > +	list_for_each_entry(vsk, bind_table, bound_table) {
>> > 		if (vsock_addr_equals_addr(addr, &vsk->local_addr))
>> > 			return sk_vsock(vsk);
>> >
>> > @@ -247,6 +248,11 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>> > 	return NULL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>> > +{
>> > +	return vsock_find_bound_socket_common(addr, vsock_bound_sockets(addr));
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static struct sock *__vsock_find_connected_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *src,
>> > 						  struct sockaddr_vm *dst)
>> > {
>> > @@ -646,12 +652,17 @@ static void vsock_pending_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> >
>> > /**** SOCKET OPERATIONS ****/
>> >
>> > -static int __vsock_bind_connectible(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>> > -				    struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>> > +static int vsock_bind_common(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>> > +			     struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
>> > +			     struct list_head *bind_table,
>> > +			     size_t table_size)
>> > {
>> > 	static u32 port;
>> > 	struct sockaddr_vm new_addr;
>> >
>> > +	if (table_size < VSOCK_HASH_SIZE)
>> > +		return -1;
>>
>> Why we need this check now?
>>
>
>If the table_size is not at least VSOCK_HASH_SIZE then the
>VSOCK_HASH(addr) used later could overflow the table.
>
>Maybe this really deserves a WARN() and a comment?

Yes, please WARN_ONCE() should be enough.

Stefano
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
Posted by Simon Horman 2 years, 8 months ago 
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:58:31AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> This commit makes the bind table management functions in vsock usable
> for different bind tables. For use by datagrams in a future patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index ef86765f3765..7a3ca4270446 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> @@ -230,11 +230,12 @@ static void __vsock_remove_connected(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>  	sock_put(&vsk->sk);
>  }
>  
> -static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> +struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
> +					    struct list_head *bind_table)

Hi Bobby,

This function seems to only be used in this file.
Should it be static?
Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/8] vsock: make vsock bind reusable
Posted by Bobby Eshleman 2 years, 7 months ago 
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:49:57AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:58:31AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > This commit makes the bind table management functions in vsock usable
> > for different bind tables. For use by datagrams in a future patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>
> > ---
> >  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > index ef86765f3765..7a3ca4270446 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > @@ -230,11 +230,12 @@ static void __vsock_remove_connected(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> >  	sock_put(&vsk->sk);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static struct sock *__vsock_find_bound_socket(struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > +struct sock *vsock_find_bound_socket_common(struct sockaddr_vm *addr,
> > +					    struct list_head *bind_table)
> 
> Hi Bobby,
> 
> This function seems to only be used in this file.
> Should it be static?

Oh good call, yep.

Thanks!
Bobby

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.