[PATCH net-next] net/ipv6: silence 'passing zero to ERR_PTR()' warning

Haoyi Liu posted 1 patch 2 years, 10 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
net/ipv6/icmp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH net-next] net/ipv6: silence 'passing zero to ERR_PTR()' warning
Posted by Haoyi Liu 2 years, 10 months ago
Smatch complains that if xfrm_lookup() returns NULL then this does a
weird thing with "err":

    net/ ipv6/ icmp.c:411 icmpv6_route_lookup()
    warn: passing zero to ERR_PTR()

Just return "dst2" directly instead of assigning it to"dst" and then
looking up the value of "err".  No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Haoyi Liu <iccccc@hust.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
---
The issue is found by static analysis, and the patch is remains untested.
---
 net/ipv6/icmp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index 1f53f2a74480..a5e77acead89 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *icmpv6_route_lookup(struct net *net,
 	dst2 = xfrm_lookup(net, dst2, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl2), sk, XFRM_LOOKUP_ICMP);
 	if (!IS_ERR(dst2)) {
 		dst_release(dst);
-		dst = dst2;
+		return dst2;
 	} else {
 		err = PTR_ERR(dst2);
 		if (err == -EPERM) {
-- 
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH net-next] net/ipv6: silence 'passing zero to ERR_PTR()' warning
Posted by Eric Dumazet 2 years, 10 months ago
On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:54 AM Haoyi Liu <iccccc@hust.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> Smatch complains that if xfrm_lookup() returns NULL then this does a
> weird thing with "err":
>
>     net/ ipv6/ icmp.c:411 icmpv6_route_lookup()
>     warn: passing zero to ERR_PTR()
>
> Just return "dst2" directly instead of assigning it to"dst" and then
> looking up the value of "err".  No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haoyi Liu <iccccc@hust.edu.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
> ---
> The issue is found by static analysis, and the patch is remains untested.
> ---
>  net/ipv6/icmp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
> index 1f53f2a74480..a5e77acead89 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *icmpv6_route_lookup(struct net *net,
>         dst2 = xfrm_lookup(net, dst2, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl2), sk, XFRM_LOOKUP_ICMP);
>         if (!IS_ERR(dst2)) {
>                 dst_release(dst);
> -               dst = dst2;
> +               return dst2;
>         } else {
>                 err = PTR_ERR(dst2);
>                 if (err == -EPERM) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Please cleanup this thing, this is a maze of returns, gotos, and
unnecessary 'else's

Thanks.

diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index 1f53f2a74480c0b8433204b567e7f98ad1216ad6..c76861f1ff6e4ee12d2686c1d135b24595989dfa
100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -395,14 +395,12 @@ static struct dst_entry
*icmpv6_route_lookup(struct net *net,
        dst2 = xfrm_lookup(net, dst2, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl2), sk,
XFRM_LOOKUP_ICMP);
        if (!IS_ERR(dst2)) {
                dst_release(dst);
-               dst = dst2;
-       } else {
-               err = PTR_ERR(dst2);
-               if (err == -EPERM) {
-                       dst_release(dst);
-                       return dst2;
-               } else
-                       goto relookup_failed;
+               return dst2;
+       }
+       err = PTR_ERR(dst2);
+       if (err == -EPERM) {
+               dst_release(dst);
+               return dst2;
        }

 relookup_failed: