drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
In case of nested MSHV, retargeting interrupt hypercall should be sent
to L0 hypervisor instead of L1 hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@linux.microsoft.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index f33370b75628..2123f632ecf7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -704,8 +704,14 @@ static void hv_arch_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
}
}
- res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | (var_size << 17),
- params, NULL);
+ if (hv_nested)
+ res = hv_do_nested_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT |
+ (var_size << 17),
+ params, NULL);
+ else
+ res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT |
+ (var_size << 17),
+ params, NULL);
exit_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock, flags);
--
2.34.1
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:35:46AM +0000, Jinank Jain wrote: > In case of nested MSHV, retargeting interrupt hypercall should be sent > to L0 hypervisor instead of L1 hypervisor. > > Signed-off-by: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@linux.microsoft.com> While I think this is a sensible change -- how did you discover this? Can you provide a bit more information? > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > index f33370b75628..2123f632ecf7 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > @@ -704,8 +704,14 @@ static void hv_arch_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) > } > } > > - res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | (var_size << 17), > - params, NULL); > + if (hv_nested) > + res = hv_do_nested_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | > + (var_size << 17), > + params, NULL); > + else > + res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | > + (var_size << 17), > + params, NULL); > > exit_unlock: > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock, flags); > -- > 2.34.1 >
This was observed while testing pass-through PCI devices on the nested MSHV setup. Regards, Jinank On 4/6/2023 4:47 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:35:46AM +0000, Jinank Jain wrote: >> In case of nested MSHV, retargeting interrupt hypercall should be sent >> to L0 hypervisor instead of L1 hypervisor. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@linux.microsoft.com> > While I think this is a sensible change -- how did you discover this? > Can you provide a bit more information? > >> --- >> drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 10 ++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c >> index f33370b75628..2123f632ecf7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c >> @@ -704,8 +704,14 @@ static void hv_arch_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) >> } >> } >> >> - res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | (var_size << 17), >> - params, NULL); >> + if (hv_nested) >> + res = hv_do_nested_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | >> + (var_size << 17), >> + params, NULL); >> + else >> + res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | >> + (var_size << 17), >> + params, NULL); >> >> exit_unlock: >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock, flags); >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>
Reviewed-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com> On 4/4/2023 4:35 AM, Jinank Jain wrote: > In case of nested MSHV, retargeting interrupt hypercall should be sent > to L0 hypervisor instead of L1 hypervisor. > > Signed-off-by: Jinank Jain <jinankjain@linux.microsoft.com> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > index f33370b75628..2123f632ecf7 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c > @@ -704,8 +704,14 @@ static void hv_arch_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) > } > } > > - res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | (var_size << 17), > - params, NULL); > + if (hv_nested) > + res = hv_do_nested_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | > + (var_size << 17), > + params, NULL); > + else > + res = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_RETARGET_INTERRUPT | > + (var_size << 17), > + params, NULL); > > exit_unlock: > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock, flags);
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.