drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
in virtio_net, if we disable the napi_tx, when we triger a tx interrupt,
the vq->event_triggered will be set to true. It will no longer be set to
false. Unless we explicitly call virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed or
virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare.
If we disable the napi_tx, it will only be called when the tx ring
buffer is relatively small.
Because event_triggered is true. Therefore, VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or
VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE will not be set. So we update
vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) or vq->packed.vring.driver->off_wrap
every time we call virtqueue_get_buf_ctx.This bring more interruptions.
To summarize:
1) event_triggered was set to true in vring_interrupt()
2) after this nothing will happen for virtqueue_disable_cb() so
VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT is not set in avail_flags_shadow
3) virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() will still think the cb is enabled
then it tries to publish new event
To fix:
update VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE to vq
when we call virtqueue_disable_cb even the event_triggered is set to true.
Tested with iperf:
iperf3 tcp stream:
vm1 -----------------> vm2
vm2 just receives tcp data stream from vm1, and sends the ack to vm1,
there are many tx interrupts in vm2.
but without event_triggered there are just a few tx interrupts.
v2->v3:
-update the interrupt disable flag even with the event_triggered is set,
-instead of checking whether event_triggered is set in
-virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_{packed/split}, will cause the drivers which have
-not called virtqueue_{enable/disable}_cb to miss notifications.
Fixes: 8d622d21d248 ("virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb")
Signed-off-by: huangjie.albert <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 307e139cb11d..ad74463a48ee 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -812,6 +812,14 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
if (!(vq->split.avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)) {
vq->split.avail_flags_shadow |= VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT;
+
+ /*
+ * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
+ * no need to disable.
+ */
+ if (vq->event_triggered)
+ return;
+
if (vq->event)
/* TODO: this is a hack. Figure out a cleaner value to write. */
vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) = 0x0;
@@ -1544,8 +1552,16 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
{
struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
- if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow != VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
+ if (!(vq->packed.event_flags_shadow & VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE)) {
vq->packed.event_flags_shadow = VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE;
+
+ /*
+ * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
+ * no need to disable.
+ */
+ if (vq->event_triggered)
+ return;
+
vq->packed.vring.driver->flags =
cpu_to_le16(vq->packed.event_flags_shadow);
}
@@ -2063,12 +2079,6 @@ void virtqueue_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
{
struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
- /* If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
- * no need to disable.
- */
- if (vq->event_triggered)
- return;
-
if (vq->packed_ring)
virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(_vq);
else
--
2.31.1
Ican't parse the subject at all. I think the subject from v2
was fine - we are skipping event index updates on get buf.
Or maybe go higher level and describe the effect of the patch:
virtio_ring: reduce interrupt rate with event idx enabled
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 03:21:35PM +0800, Albert Huang wrote:
> From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
>
> in virtio_net, if we disable the napi_tx, when we triger a tx interrupt,
> the vq->event_triggered will be set to true. It will no longer be set to
> false.
this last sentence is redundant
> Unless we explicitly call virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed or
> virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare.
>
> If we disable the napi_tx, it will only be called when the tx ring
> buffer is relatively small.
>
> Because event_triggered is true. Therefore, VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or
> VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE will not be set. So we update
> vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) or vq->packed.vring.driver->off_wrap
> every time we call virtqueue_get_buf_ctx.This bring more interruptions.
This will bring more interrupts. And pls add space after ".".
>
> To summarize:
> 1) event_triggered was set to true in vring_interrupt()
> 2) after this nothing will happen for virtqueue_disable_cb() so
> VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT is not set in avail_flags_shadow
> 3) virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() will still think the cb is enabled
> then it tries to publish new event
>
> To fix:
> update VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE to vq
> when we call virtqueue_disable_cb even the event_triggered is set to true.
bad grammar here and way too much detail. better:
make disable_cb set VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or
VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE in flags shadow to make get_buf
correctly detect that callbacks are disabled.
>
> Tested with iperf:
> iperf3 tcp stream:
> vm1 -----------------> vm2
> vm2 just receives tcp data stream from vm1, and sends the ack to vm1,
> there are many tx interrupts in vm2.
> but without event_triggered there are just a few tx interrupts.
>
put changelog after --- please.
> v2->v3:
> -update the interrupt disable flag even with the event_triggered is set,
> -instead of checking whether event_triggered is set in
> -virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_{packed/split}, will cause the drivers which have
> -not called virtqueue_{enable/disable}_cb to miss notifications.
>
> Fixes: 8d622d21d248 ("virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb")
> Signed-off-by: huangjie.albert <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 307e139cb11d..ad74463a48ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -812,6 +812,14 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>
> if (!(vq->split.avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)) {
> vq->split.avail_flags_shadow |= VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT;
> +
> + /*
> + * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> + * no need to disable.
> + */
> + if (vq->event_triggered)
> + return;
> +
> if (vq->event)
> /* TODO: this is a hack. Figure out a cleaner value to write. */
> vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) = 0x0;
> @@ -1544,8 +1552,16 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> - if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow != VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
> + if (!(vq->packed.event_flags_shadow & VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE)) {
Why are you making this change? It's not great because it
only works because VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE happens
to equal 0x1. does not the patch work with the original
if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow != VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE)
?
Besides, if you are making unrelated changes commit log should
describe them.
> vq->packed.event_flags_shadow = VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE;
> +
> + /*
> + * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> + * no need to disable.
> + */
> + if (vq->event_triggered)
> + return;
> +
> vq->packed.vring.driver->flags =
> cpu_to_le16(vq->packed.event_flags_shadow);
> }
> @@ -2063,12 +2079,6 @@ void virtqueue_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> - /* If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> - * no need to disable.
> - */
> - if (vq->event_triggered)
> - return;
> -
> if (vq->packed_ring)
> virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(_vq);
> else
> --
> 2.31.1
Maybe one new thread is better.
Thanks.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:21:35 +0800, Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com> wrote:
> From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
>
> in virtio_net, if we disable the napi_tx, when we triger a tx interrupt,
> the vq->event_triggered will be set to true. It will no longer be set to
> false. Unless we explicitly call virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed or
> virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare.
>
> If we disable the napi_tx, it will only be called when the tx ring
> buffer is relatively small.
>
> Because event_triggered is true. Therefore, VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or
> VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE will not be set. So we update
> vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) or vq->packed.vring.driver->off_wrap
> every time we call virtqueue_get_buf_ctx.This bring more interruptions.
>
> To summarize:
> 1) event_triggered was set to true in vring_interrupt()
> 2) after this nothing will happen for virtqueue_disable_cb() so
> VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT is not set in avail_flags_shadow
> 3) virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() will still think the cb is enabled
> then it tries to publish new event
>
> To fix:
> update VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT or VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE to vq
> when we call virtqueue_disable_cb even the event_triggered is set to true.
>
> Tested with iperf:
> iperf3 tcp stream:
> vm1 -----------------> vm2
> vm2 just receives tcp data stream from vm1, and sends the ack to vm1,
> there are many tx interrupts in vm2.
> but without event_triggered there are just a few tx interrupts.
>
> v2->v3:
> -update the interrupt disable flag even with the event_triggered is set,
> -instead of checking whether event_triggered is set in
> -virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_{packed/split}, will cause the drivers which have
> -not called virtqueue_{enable/disable}_cb to miss notifications.
>
> Fixes: 8d622d21d248 ("virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb")
> Signed-off-by: huangjie.albert <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 307e139cb11d..ad74463a48ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -812,6 +812,14 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>
> if (!(vq->split.avail_flags_shadow & VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT)) {
> vq->split.avail_flags_shadow |= VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT;
> +
> + /*
> + * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> + * no need to disable.
> + */
> + if (vq->event_triggered)
> + return;
> +
> if (vq->event)
> /* TODO: this is a hack. Figure out a cleaner value to write. */
> vring_used_event(&vq->split.vring) = 0x0;
> @@ -1544,8 +1552,16 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> - if (vq->packed.event_flags_shadow != VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE) {
> + if (!(vq->packed.event_flags_shadow & VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE)) {
> vq->packed.event_flags_shadow = VRING_PACKED_EVENT_FLAG_DISABLE;
> +
> + /*
> + * If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> + * no need to disable.
> + */
> + if (vq->event_triggered)
> + return;
> +
> vq->packed.vring.driver->flags =
> cpu_to_le16(vq->packed.event_flags_shadow);
> }
> @@ -2063,12 +2079,6 @@ void virtqueue_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> {
> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>
> - /* If device triggered an event already it won't trigger one again:
> - * no need to disable.
> - */
> - if (vq->event_triggered)
> - return;
> -
> if (vq->packed_ring)
> virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(_vq);
> else
> --
> 2.31.1
>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 03:27:03PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > Maybe one new thread is better. > > Thanks. I don't know but do not post same message twice please without explanation. if you repost put "PATCH repost" in the subject.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.