From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
There're two call paths for setting up port 5:
mt7530_setup()
-> mt7530_setup_port5()
mt753x_phylink_mac_config()
-> mt753x_mac_config()
-> mt7530_mac_config()
-> mt7530_setup_port5()
The first call path is supposed to run when phy muxing is being used. In
this case, port 5 is somewhat of a hidden port. It won't be defined on the
devicetree so phylink can't be used to manage the port.
The second call path used to call mt7530_setup_port5() directly under case
5 on mt7530_phylink_mac_config() before it was moved to mt7530_mac_config()
with 88bdef8be9f6 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Extend device data ready for adding a
new hardware"). mt7530_setup_port5() will never run through this call path
because the current code on mt7530_setup() bypasses phylink for all cases
of port 5.
Leave it to phylink if port 5 is used as a CPU port or a user port. For the
cases of phy muxing or the port being disabled, call mt7530_setup_port5()
directly from mt7530_setup_port5() without involving phylink.
Move setting the interface and P5_DISABLED mode to a more specific
location. They're supposed to be overwritten if phy muxing is detected.
Add comments which explain the process.
Fixes: 38f790a80560 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5")
Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
index 62a4b899a961..eba356249ada 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
@@ -2247,16 +2247,18 @@ mt7530_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
return ret;
/* Setup port 5 */
- priv->p5_intf_sel = P5_DISABLED;
- interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
-
if (!dsa_is_unused_port(ds, 5)) {
+ /* Set the interface selection of port 5 to GMAC5 when it's used
+ * as a CPU port or a user port. Let phylink handle the rest.
+ */
priv->p5_intf_sel = P5_INTF_SEL_GMAC5;
- ret = of_get_phy_mode(dsa_to_port(ds, 5)->dn, &interface);
- if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
- return ret;
} else {
- /* Scan the ethernet nodes. look for GMAC1, lookup used phy */
+ /* Scan the ethernet nodes. Look for GMAC1, lookup the used phy.
+ * Determine if phy muxing is defined and which phy to mux.
+ */
+ priv->p5_intf_sel = P5_DISABLED;
+ interface = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
+
for_each_child_of_node(dn, mac_np) {
if (!of_device_is_compatible(mac_np,
"mediatek,eth-mac"))
@@ -2287,6 +2289,8 @@ mt7530_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
of_node_put(phy_node);
break;
}
+
+ mt7530_setup_port5(ds, interface);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
@@ -2297,8 +2301,6 @@ mt7530_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_GPIOLIB */
- mt7530_setup_port5(ds, interface);
-
/* Flush the FDB table */
ret = mt7530_fdb_cmd(priv, MT7530_FDB_FLUSH, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
--
2.37.2
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 05:08:13PM +0300, arinc9.unal@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
>
> There're two call paths for setting up port 5:
>
> mt7530_setup()
> -> mt7530_setup_port5()
>
> mt753x_phylink_mac_config()
> -> mt753x_mac_config()
> -> mt7530_mac_config()
> -> mt7530_setup_port5()
>
> The first call path is supposed to run when phy muxing is being used. In
> this case, port 5 is somewhat of a hidden port. It won't be defined on the
> devicetree so phylink can't be used to manage the port.
>
> The second call path used to call mt7530_setup_port5() directly under case
> 5 on mt7530_phylink_mac_config() before it was moved to mt7530_mac_config()
> with 88bdef8be9f6 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Extend device data ready for adding a
> new hardware"). mt7530_setup_port5() will never run through this call path
> because the current code on mt7530_setup() bypasses phylink for all cases
> of port 5.
>
> Leave it to phylink if port 5 is used as a CPU port or a user port. For the
> cases of phy muxing or the port being disabled, call mt7530_setup_port5()
> directly from mt7530_setup_port5() without involving phylink.
You probably don't mean "call X() from X()" (that would make it recursive),
but maybe from mt7530_setup(). But it was already called from mt7530_setup(),
so I don't understand what is being transmitted here...
>
> Move setting the interface and P5_DISABLED mode to a more specific
> location. They're supposed to be overwritten if phy muxing is detected.
>
> Add comments which explain the process.
>
> Fixes: 38f790a80560 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5")
> Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
> ---
Sorry, I didn't understand... so what was the problem, and how does the
movement of the mt7530_setup_port5() call that isn't under phylink solve
that problem?
On 27.03.2023 21:49, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 05:08:13PM +0300, arinc9.unal@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
>>
>> There're two call paths for setting up port 5:
>>
>> mt7530_setup()
>> -> mt7530_setup_port5()
>>
>> mt753x_phylink_mac_config()
>> -> mt753x_mac_config()
>> -> mt7530_mac_config()
>> -> mt7530_setup_port5()
>>
>> The first call path is supposed to run when phy muxing is being used. In
>> this case, port 5 is somewhat of a hidden port. It won't be defined on the
>> devicetree so phylink can't be used to manage the port.
>>
>> The second call path used to call mt7530_setup_port5() directly under case
>> 5 on mt7530_phylink_mac_config() before it was moved to mt7530_mac_config()
>> with 88bdef8be9f6 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Extend device data ready for adding a
>> new hardware"). mt7530_setup_port5() will never run through this call path
>> because the current code on mt7530_setup() bypasses phylink for all cases
>> of port 5.
>>
>> Leave it to phylink if port 5 is used as a CPU port or a user port. For the
>> cases of phy muxing or the port being disabled, call mt7530_setup_port5()
>> directly from mt7530_setup_port5() without involving phylink.
>
> You probably don't mean "call X() from X()" (that would make it recursive),
> but maybe from mt7530_setup(). But it was already called from mt7530_setup(),
> so I don't understand what is being transmitted here...
Oops, I meant to say call mt7530_setup_port5() directly from
mt7530_setup() without involving phylink. Will fix.
>
>>
>> Move setting the interface and P5_DISABLED mode to a more specific
>> location. They're supposed to be overwritten if phy muxing is detected.
>>
>> Add comments which explain the process.
>>
>> Fixes: 38f790a80560 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5")
>> Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
>> ---
>
> Sorry, I didn't understand... so what was the problem, and how does the
> movement of the mt7530_setup_port5() call that isn't under phylink solve
> that problem?
Port 5 being used as a CPU or user port was being set up from
mt7530_setup() instead of using phylink. This patch fixes that.
Arınç
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.