depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157

[PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157

Posted by Christophe Kerello 2 years, 10 months ago

To be able to compile the driver on all STM32MP SOCs, we move the
"depends on" on ARCH_STM32.

Christophe Kerello (2):
  memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
    MACH_STM32MP157
  mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
    MACH_STM32MP157

 drivers/memory/Kconfig       | 2 +-
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157

Posted by Miquel Raynal 2 years, 10 months ago

Hi Christophe,

christophe.kerello@foss.st.com wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:51:03 +0100:

> To be able to compile the driver on all STM32MP SOCs, we move the
> "depends on" on ARCH_STM32.
> 
> Christophe Kerello (2):
>   memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>     MACH_STM32MP157
>   mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>     MACH_STM32MP157

I don't see issue with taking these two patches in independent trees so
if nobody disagrees I will take the second one through the mtd tree and
let Krzysztof take the first one through mem-ctrl.

> 
>  drivers/memory/Kconfig       | 2 +-
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 


Thanks,
Miquèl

Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157

Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 2 years, 10 months ago

On 24/03/2023 17:03, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
> 
> christophe.kerello@foss.st.com wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:51:03 +0100:
> 
>> To be able to compile the driver on all STM32MP SOCs, we move the
>> "depends on" on ARCH_STM32.
>>
>> Christophe Kerello (2):
>>   memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>>     MACH_STM32MP157
>>   mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>>     MACH_STM32MP157
> 
> I don't see issue with taking these two patches in independent trees so
> if nobody disagrees I will take the second one through the mtd tree and
> let Krzysztof take the first one through mem-ctrl.

Sure, np.

Best regards,
Krzysztof