[PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2

Yohan Joung posted 1 patch 2 years, 10 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2
Posted by Yohan Joung 2 years, 10 months ago
Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well

Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 055e70e77aa2..46458085a8d0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 		sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
 		nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
 
-		if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
+		if (sector % bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) ||
 				nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
 			f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
 				 devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",

base-commit: d15180a8d1d72c7bddcb700d2c9ffdab7d2b9481
-- 
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2
Posted by Jaegeuk Kim 2 years, 10 months ago
On 03/23, Yohan Joung wrote:
> Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 055e70e77aa2..46458085a8d0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  		sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
>  		nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
>  
> -		if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
> +		if (sector % bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) ||

Need to use div_u64_rem()?

>  				nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
>  			f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
>  				 devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
> 
> base-commit: d15180a8d1d72c7bddcb700d2c9ffdab7d2b9481
> -- 
> 2.25.1
[PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2
Posted by Yohan Joung 2 years, 10 months ago
Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well

Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 055e70e77aa2..f4a22a065277 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	sector_t sector, nr_sects;
 	block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
 	int devi = 0;
+	u32 remainder = 0;
 
 	if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
 		devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart);
@@ -1857,9 +1858,9 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 	if (f2fs_blkz_is_seq(sbi, devi, blkstart)) {
 		sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
 		nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
+		div_u64_rem(sector, bdev_zone_sectors(bdev), &remainder);
 
-		if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
-				nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
+		if (remainder || nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
 			f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
 				 devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
 				 blkstart, blklen);
-- 
2.25.1
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2
Posted by Chao Yu 2 years, 10 months ago
On 2023/3/24 21:07, Yohan Joung wrote:
> Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 055e70e77aa2..f4a22a065277 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   	sector_t sector, nr_sects;
>   	block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
>   	int devi = 0;
> +	u32 remainder = 0;
>   
>   	if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
>   		devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart);
> @@ -1857,9 +1858,9 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>   	if (f2fs_blkz_is_seq(sbi, devi, blkstart)) {
>   		sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
>   		nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
> +		div_u64_rem(sector, bdev_zone_sectors(bdev), &remainder);

Should use div64_u64_rem()? As both sector and return value of bdev_zone_sectors()
are u64.

Thanks,

>   
> -		if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
> -				nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> +		if (remainder || nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
>   			f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
>   				 devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
>   				 blkstart, blklen);
RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2
Posted by Yohan Joung 2 years, 10 months ago
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chao Yu [mailto:chao@kernel.org]
> Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 10:49 AM
> To: Yohan Joung; jaegeuk@kernel.org
> Cc: lkp@intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-
> devel@lists.sourceforge.net; oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2
> 
> On 2023/3/24 21:07, Yohan Joung wrote:
> > Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
> > ---
> >   fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index
> > 055e70e77aa2..f4a22a065277 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >   	sector_t sector, nr_sects;
> >   	block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
> >   	int devi = 0;
> > +	u32 remainder = 0;
> >
> >   	if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
> >   		devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart); @@ -1857,9
> +1858,9
> > @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >   	if (f2fs_blkz_is_seq(sbi, devi, blkstart)) {
> >   		sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
> >   		nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
> > +		div_u64_rem(sector, bdev_zone_sectors(bdev), &remainder);
> 
> Should use div64_u64_rem()? As both sector and return value of
> bdev_zone_sectors() are u64.
> 
> Thanks,
Upload based on your comments.
Thanks
> 
> >
> > -		if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
> > -				nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> > +		if (remainder || nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> >   			f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted
> (block %x + %x)",
> >   				 devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
> >   				 blkstart, blklen);