fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 055e70e77aa2..46458085a8d0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
- if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
+ if (sector % bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) ||
nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
base-commit: d15180a8d1d72c7bddcb700d2c9ffdab7d2b9481
--
2.25.1
On 03/23, Yohan Joung wrote:
> Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
>
> Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 055e70e77aa2..46458085a8d0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
> nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
>
> - if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
> + if (sector % bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) ||
Need to use div_u64_rem()?
> nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
> devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
>
> base-commit: d15180a8d1d72c7bddcb700d2c9ffdab7d2b9481
> --
> 2.25.1
Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 055e70e77aa2..f4a22a065277 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
sector_t sector, nr_sects;
block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
int devi = 0;
+ u32 remainder = 0;
if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart);
@@ -1857,9 +1858,9 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
if (f2fs_blkz_is_seq(sbi, devi, blkstart)) {
sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
+ div_u64_rem(sector, bdev_zone_sectors(bdev), &remainder);
- if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
- nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
+ if (remainder || nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
blkstart, blklen);
--
2.25.1
On 2023/3/24 21:07, Yohan Joung wrote:
> Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
>
> Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 055e70e77aa2..f4a22a065277 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> sector_t sector, nr_sects;
> block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
> int devi = 0;
> + u32 remainder = 0;
>
> if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
> devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart);
> @@ -1857,9 +1858,9 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> if (f2fs_blkz_is_seq(sbi, devi, blkstart)) {
> sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
> nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
> + div_u64_rem(sector, bdev_zone_sectors(bdev), &remainder);
Should use div64_u64_rem()? As both sector and return value of bdev_zone_sectors()
are u64.
Thanks,
>
> - if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
> - nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> + if (remainder || nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted (block %x + %x)",
> devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
> blkstart, blklen);
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chao Yu [mailto:chao@kernel.org]
> Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 10:49 AM
> To: Yohan Joung; jaegeuk@kernel.org
> Cc: lkp@intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-
> devel@lists.sourceforge.net; oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix align check for npo2
>
> On 2023/3/24 21:07, Yohan Joung wrote:
> > Fix alignment check to be correct in npo2 as well
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index
> > 055e70e77aa2..f4a22a065277 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > sector_t sector, nr_sects;
> > block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
> > int devi = 0;
> > + u32 remainder = 0;
> >
> > if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
> > devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart); @@ -1857,9
> +1858,9
> > @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > if (f2fs_blkz_is_seq(sbi, devi, blkstart)) {
> > sector = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blkstart);
> > nr_sects = SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(blklen);
> > + div_u64_rem(sector, bdev_zone_sectors(bdev), &remainder);
>
> Should use div64_u64_rem()? As both sector and return value of
> bdev_zone_sectors() are u64.
>
> Thanks,
Upload based on your comments.
Thanks
>
> >
> > - if (sector & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1) ||
> > - nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> > + if (remainder || nr_sects != bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)) {
> > f2fs_err(sbi, "(%d) %s: Unaligned zone reset attempted
> (block %x + %x)",
> > devi, sbi->s_ndevs ? FDEV(devi).path : "",
> > blkstart, blklen);
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.