Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
@@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
"jedec,ufs-2.0";
reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
<0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
- reg-names = "std", "ice";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
phy-names = "ufsphy";
--
2.34.1
On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
> "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
> - reg-names = "std", "ice";
This is also part of:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi,
On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
>> "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
>> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
>> - reg-names = "std", "ice";
>
> This is also part of:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
Neil
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Hi Neil,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
> > > ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
> > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
> > > "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> > > reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
> > > <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
> > > - reg-names = "std", "ice";
> >
> > This is also part of:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
> > but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
>
> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
>
The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that
patch got missed, though:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com
- Eric
Hi Eric,
On Fri Mar 24, 2023 at 7:52 AM CET, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > > Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
> > > > ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > > @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
> > > > "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> > > > reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
> > > > <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
> > > > - reg-names = "std", "ice";
> > >
> > > This is also part of:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
> > > but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
> >
> > I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
> > and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
> >
>
> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
> be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that
> patch got missed, though:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com
Are you implying that I should resend the patch or something? Not sure
who to bug about applying this patch.
Regards
Luca
>
> - Eric
On 24/03/2023 08:26, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri Mar 24, 2023 at 7:52 AM CET, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
>>>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
>>>>> "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>>>> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
>>>>> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
>>>>> - reg-names = "std", "ice";
>>>>
>>>> This is also part of:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
>>>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
>>>
>>> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
>>> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
>>>
>>
>> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
>> be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
>> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that
>> patch got missed, though:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com
>
> Are you implying that I should resend the patch or something? Not sure
> who to bug about applying this patch.
Yes, you should. It has been almost three months...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 24/03/2023 07:52, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
>>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
>>>> "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>>> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
>>>> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
>>>> - reg-names = "std", "ice";
>>>
>>> This is also part of:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@linaro.org/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
>>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
>>
>> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
>> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
>>
>
> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
> be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that
> patch got missed, though:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@fairphone.com
Exactly. This is why I never saw these warnings.
Neil, there are a lot of pending patches, so you need to be sure you run
dtbs_check with them applied.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.