The device name is already printed with dev_err(), no need to repeat.
The device pointer itself is not supposed to be an error point, drop
that check.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
index 32e96cb49067..0e04ea185c26 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
@@ -1367,9 +1367,8 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev)
 	list_del(&edev->entry);
 	mutex_unlock(&extcon_dev_list_lock);
 
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(get_device(&edev->dev))) {
-		dev_err(&edev->dev, "Failed to unregister extcon_dev (%s)\n",
-				dev_name(&edev->dev));
+	if (!get_device(&edev->dev)) {
+		dev_err(&edev->dev, "Failed to unregister extcon_dev\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b

On 23. 3. 22. 23:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The device name is already printed with dev_err(), no need to repeat.
> The device pointer itself is not supposed to be an error point, drop
> that check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> index 32e96cb49067..0e04ea185c26 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
> @@ -1367,9 +1367,8 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev)
>  	list_del(&edev->entry);
>  	mutex_unlock(&extcon_dev_list_lock);
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(get_device(&edev->dev))) {
> -		dev_err(&edev->dev, "Failed to unregister extcon_dev (%s)\n",
> -				dev_name(&edev->dev));
> +	if (!get_device(&edev->dev)) {
> +		dev_err(&edev->dev, "Failed to unregister extcon_dev\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  

Applied it. Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi