Makefile | 4 +- arch/alpha/kernel/module.c | 4 +- arch/mips/include/asm/mach-rc32434/pci.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 11 +- drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-apq8084.c | 271 ------------------------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 +- drivers/macintosh/windfarm_lm75_sensor.c | 4 +- drivers/macintosh/windfarm_smu_sensors.c | 4 +- drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c | 2 +- drivers/nfc/fdp/i2c.c | 4 + fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 2 + fs/ext4/inline.c | 1 - fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 +- fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 1 + fs/ext4/namei.c | 13 +- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 3 + fs/file.c | 1 + include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 + net/caif/caif_usb.c | 3 + net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c | 1 + net/nfc/netlink.c | 2 +- net/tipc/socket.c | 2 +- 22 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 295 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release.
There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.310-rc2.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 4.14.310-rc2
Rhythm Mahajan <rhythm.m.mahajan@oracle.com>
x86/cpu: Fix LFENCE serialization check in init_amd()
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
drm/i915: Don't use BAR mappings for ring buffers with LLC
Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au>
tipc: improve function tipc_wait_for_cond()
Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com>
media: ov5640: Fix analogue gain control
Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com>
PCI: Add SolidRun vendor ID
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
macintosh: windfarm: Use unsigned type for 1-bit bitfields
Edward Humes <aurxenon@lunos.org>
alpha: fix R_ALPHA_LITERAL reloc for large modules
xurui <xurui@kylinos.cn>
MIPS: Fix a compilation issue
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks
Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com>
net: caif: Fix use-after-free in cfusbl_device_notify()
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
ila: do not generate empty messages in ila_xlat_nl_cmd_get_mapping()
Kang Chen <void0red@gmail.com>
nfc: fdp: add null check of devm_kmalloc_array in fdp_nci_i2c_read_device_properties
Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
nfc: change order inside nfc_se_io error path
Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
ext4: zero i_disksize when initializing the bootloader inode
Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
ext4: fix WARNING in ext4_update_inline_data
Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
ext4: move where set the MAY_INLINE_DATA flag is set
Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
ext4: fix another off-by-one fsmap error on 1k block filesystems
Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
ext4: fix RENAME_WHITEOUT handling for inline directories
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
x86/CPU/AMD: Disable XSAVES on AMD family 0x17
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
fs: prevent out-of-bounds array speculation when closing a file descriptor
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/alpha/kernel/module.c | 4 +-
arch/mips/include/asm/mach-rc32434/pci.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 11 +-
drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-apq8084.c | 271 -------------------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 +-
drivers/macintosh/windfarm_lm75_sensor.c | 4 +-
drivers/macintosh/windfarm_smu_sensors.c | 4 +-
drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c | 2 +-
drivers/nfc/fdp/i2c.c | 4 +
fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 2 +
fs/ext4/inline.c | 1 -
fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 +-
fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 1 +
fs/ext4/namei.c | 13 +-
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 3 +
fs/file.c | 1 +
include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 +
net/caif/caif_usb.c | 3 +
net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c | 1 +
net/nfc/netlink.c | 2 +-
net/tipc/socket.c | 2 +-
22 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 295 deletions(-)
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 14:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.310-rc2.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 4.14.310-rc2 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-4.14.y * git commit: 12379b7d143a8f0f07b4c069202ed684212ecacc * git describe: v4.14.308-25-g12379b7d143a * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.308-25-g12379b7d143a ## Test Regressions (compared to v4.14.308) ## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.14.308) ## Test Fixes (compared to v4.14.308) ## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.14.308) ## Test result summary total: 72731, pass: 62239, fail: 2894, skip: 7289, xfail: 309 ## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 199 total, 197 passed, 2 failed * arm64: 37 total, 35 passed, 2 failed * i386: 29 total, 28 passed, 1 failed * mips: 41 total, 41 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 20 total, 19 passed, 1 failed * s390: 15 total, 11 passed, 4 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed ## Test suites summary * boot * fwts * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * vdso -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:49:41AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 168 pass: 168 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter
Hello Greg, > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Sent: 16 March 2023 08:50 > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. It sounds like there may be an -rc3 on the way, but for what it's worth... CIP configurations built and booted with Linux 4.14.310-rc2 (12379b7d143a): https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/808352628 https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/commits/linux-4.14.y Tested-by: Chris Paterson (CIP) <chris.paterson2@renesas.com> Kind regards, Chris
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:25:29AM +0000, Chris Paterson wrote: > Hello Greg, > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > Sent: 16 March 2023 08:50 > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > It sounds like there may be an -rc3 on the way, but for what it's worth... There is? Only for 4.19.y. thanks, greg k-h
Hello Greg, > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Sent: 16 March 2023 11:34 > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:25:29AM +0000, Chris Paterson wrote: > > Hello Greg, > > > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > > Sent: 16 March 2023 08:50 > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > > > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > It sounds like there may be an -rc3 on the way, but for what it's worth... > > There is? Only for 4.19.y. Ah, I was referring to you saying you'd drop "clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks". I was assuming that meant another RC. /me must stop assuming things... Chris
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:57:55AM +0000, Chris Paterson wrote: > Hello Greg, > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > Sent: 16 March 2023 11:34 > > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:25:29AM +0000, Chris Paterson wrote: > > > Hello Greg, > > > > > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > > > Sent: 16 March 2023 08:50 > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > > > > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:33:04 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > It sounds like there may be an -rc3 on the way, but for what it's worth... > > > > There is? Only for 4.19.y. > > Ah, I was referring to you saying you'd drop "clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks". > I was assuming that meant another RC. > /me must stop assuming things... Dropping a patch that is not causing build or test errors generally does not mean a new -rc is to be released . thanks, greg k-h
Hi! > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks This looks like a cleanup, we should not need it in stable. > Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com> > media: ov5640: Fix analogue gain control This is an API tweak, not a bugfix. This will have negative impact on users upgrading from 4.14.309 and 4.14.310, because you can be pretty sure someone out there uses the "old" interface in their application. I'm probably responsible for that sin in millipixels fork. Best regards, Pavel -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:58:56AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > > clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks > > This looks like a cleanup, we should not need it in stable. Now removed. > > Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com> > > media: ov5640: Fix analogue gain control > > This is an API tweak, not a bugfix. This will have negative impact on > users upgrading from 4.14.309 and 4.14.310, because you can be pretty > sure someone out there uses the "old" interface in their > application. I'm probably responsible for that sin in millipixels > fork. They would have the same "impact" when moving to a newer kernel anyway, so this seems like a valid bugfix to me. thanks, greg k-h
(added patch authors to cc) > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > > clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks > > This looks like a cleanup, we should not need it in stable. > > > Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com> > > media: ov5640: Fix analogue gain control > > This is an API tweak, not a bugfix. This will have negative impact on > users upgrading from 4.14.309 and 4.14.310, because you can be pretty > sure someone out there uses the "old" interface in their > application. I'm probably responsible for that sin in millipixels > fork. > > Best regards, > Pavel > -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On 16/03/2023 11:00, Pavel Machek wrote: > (added patch authors to cc) > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. >>> There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >> >>> Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> >>> clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks >> >> This looks like a cleanup, we should not need it in stable. Totally agree here. >> >>> Paul Elder <paul.elder@ideasonboard.com> >>> media: ov5640: Fix analogue gain control >> >> This is an API tweak, not a bugfix. This will have negative impact on >> users upgrading from 4.14.309 and 4.14.310, because you can be pretty >> sure someone out there uses the "old" interface in their >> application. I'm probably responsible for that sin in millipixels >> fork. >> >> Best regards, >> Pavel >> > > > -- With best wishes Dmitry
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 16/03/2023 11:00, Pavel Machek wrote: > > (added patch authors to cc) > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.310 release. > > > > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > > > > clk: qcom: mmcc-apq8084: remove spdm clocks > > > > > > This looks like a cleanup, we should not need it in stable. > > Totally agree here. Now dropped, thanks. greg k-h
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.