[PATCH v2] mm: memory-failure: directly use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT)

Kefeng Wang posted 1 patch 2 years, 11 months ago
mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH v2] mm: memory-failure: directly use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT)
Posted by Kefeng Wang 2 years, 11 months ago
It's more clear and simple to just use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT)
to check whether or not to enable HWPoison injector module instead of
CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT/CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT_MODULE.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> 
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
---
v2:
- add Ack/Rb, also update the suject/changelog suggested by Andrew
 mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index fae9baf3be16..f761704d27d7 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static bool page_handle_poison(struct page *page, bool hugepage_or_freepage, boo
 	return true;
 }
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT) || defined(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT_MODULE)
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT)
 
 u32 hwpoison_filter_enable = 0;
 u32 hwpoison_filter_dev_major = ~0U;
-- 
2.35.3