In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is
a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against".

Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com>
---
 Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time.  Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and
 reviewers sometimes get grumpy.  Even in that case, though, respond
 politely and address the problems they have pointed out.  When sending a next
 version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
-explaining difference aganst previous submission (see
+explaining difference against previous submission (see
 :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).
 
 See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for recommendations on email
-- 
2.25.1

Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com> writes:

> In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is
> a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against".
>
> Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time.  Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and
>  reviewers sometimes get grumpy.  Even in that case, though, respond
>  politely and address the problems they have pointed out.  When sending a next
>  version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
> -explaining difference aganst previous submission (see
> +explaining difference against previous submission (see
>  :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).

Applied, thanks.

jon