There is no need to declare an extra tables to just create directory,
this can be easily be done with a prefix path with register_sysctl().

Simplify this registration.

Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---

This is part of the effort to phase out calls that can recurse from
sysctl registration [0]. If you have a tree to take this in feel free
to take it, or I can take it too through sysclt-next. Let me know!

This file has no explicit maintainer, so I assume there is no tree.

If I so no one taking it I can take in as part of sysctl-next later.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230310223947.3917711-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/T/#u

 kernel/utsname_sysctl.c | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c b/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
index f50398cb790d..019e3a1566cf 100644
--- a/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
@@ -123,15 +123,6 @@ static struct ctl_table uts_kern_table[] = {
 	{}
 };
 
-static struct ctl_table uts_root_table[] = {
-	{
-		.procname	= "kernel",
-		.mode		= 0555,
-		.child		= uts_kern_table,
-	},
-	{}
-};
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
 /*
  * Notify userspace about a change in a certain entry of uts_kern_table,
@@ -147,7 +138,7 @@ void uts_proc_notify(enum uts_proc proc)
 
 static int __init utsname_sysctl_init(void)
 {
-	register_sysctl_table(uts_root_table);
+	register_sysctl("kernel", uts_kern_table);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.1

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 03:16:56PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> There is no need to declare an extra tables to just create directory,
> this can be easily be done with a prefix path with register_sysctl().
> 
> Simplify this registration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> ---

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:16:56 -0800 Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:

> This is part of the effort to phase out calls that can recurse from
> sysctl registration [0]. If you have a tree to take this in feel free
> to take it, or I can take it too through sysclt-next. Let me know!
> 
> This file has no explicit maintainer, so I assume there is no tree.

I act as a backstop for such changes, if people cc me.

> If I so no one taking it I can take in as part of sysctl-next later.

Please do that.

Hi Luis,

Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>

Kind regards,
Petr

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 03:16:56PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> There is no need to declare an extra tables to just create directory,
> this can be easily be done with a prefix path with register_sysctl().
> 
> Simplify this registration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

> ---
> 
> This is part of the effort to phase out calls that can recurse from
> sysctl registration [0]. If you have a tree to take this in feel free
> to take it, or I can take it too through sysclt-next. Let me know!
> 
> This file has no explicit maintainer, so I assume there is no tree.
> 
> If I so no one taking it I can take in as part of sysctl-next later.

I recommend taking it in your tree like this, thanks.

greg k-h