It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
index 0ce1543426a4..dd3bdc221b94 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int xway_stp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	/* check which edge trigger we should use, default to a falling edge */
-	if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising", NULL))
+	if (!of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising"))
 		chip->edge = XWAY_STP_FALLING;
 
 	clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c
index de6afa3f9716..0422637796cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int tb10x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tb10x_gpio);
 
-	if (of_find_property(np, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(np, "interrupt-controller")) {
 		struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
 
 		ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-- 
2.39.2

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:47 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
> Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

You are using of_property_present() rather than of_property_read_bool()
but I'm not picky about commit message details.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 4:41 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:47 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
> > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> You are using of_property_present() rather than of_property_read_bool()
> but I'm not picky about commit message details.

ugg, well, it's the commit message that's correct. I missed updating
this one to use of_property_read_bool().

Rob

> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij