arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 2 +- arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c
index d967e4c0cf24..79e29bf42a24 100644
--- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c
+++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int ltq_pci_startup(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* and enable the clocks */
clk_enable(clk_pci);
- if (of_find_property(node, "lantiq,external-clock", NULL))
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "lantiq,external-clock"))
clk_enable(clk_external);
else
clk_disable(clk_external);
diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c
index d59888aaed81..4ac68a534e4f 100644
--- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c
+++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int rt3883_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* find the interrupt controller child node */
for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
- if (of_get_property(child, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) {
+ if (of_property_read_bool(child, "interrupt-controller")) {
rpc->intc_of_node = child;
break;
}
--
2.39.2
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:46:56AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool(). > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 2 +- > arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) applied to mips-next. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Hi Rob, On 10/3/23 15:46, Rob Herring wrote: > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool(). > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > --- > arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 2 +- > arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > index d967e4c0cf24..79e29bf42a24 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int ltq_pci_startup(struct platform_device *pdev) > > /* and enable the clocks */ > clk_enable(clk_pci); > - if (of_find_property(node, "lantiq,external-clock", NULL)) > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "lantiq,external-clock")) Just curious, is this property correct? I can't find it and wonder if this is dead code (always disabling the clock)... I'm probably missing something obvious :/ > clk_enable(clk_external); > else > clk_disable(clk_external);
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 3:25 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On 10/3/23 15:46, Rob Herring wrote: > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. > > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > --- > > arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 2 +- > > arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > > index d967e4c0cf24..79e29bf42a24 100644 > > --- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int ltq_pci_startup(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > /* and enable the clocks */ > > clk_enable(clk_pci); > > - if (of_find_property(node, "lantiq,external-clock", NULL)) > > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "lantiq,external-clock")) > > Just curious, is this property correct? Shrug. I can only tell from how it is used here and because we have other similar properties used to select a clock. > I can't find it and wonder if > this is dead code (always disabling the clock)... I'm probably missing > something obvious :/ If you don't use the external clock, then you disable it. Seems sensible to me. > > > clk_enable(clk_external); > > else > > clk_disable(clk_external); >
Hi, On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 09:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On 10/3/23 15:46, Rob Herring wrote: > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. > > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > --- > > arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 2 +- > > arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > > index d967e4c0cf24..79e29bf42a24 100644 > > --- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c > > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int ltq_pci_startup(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > /* and enable the clocks */ > > clk_enable(clk_pci); > > - if (of_find_property(node, "lantiq,external-clock", NULL)) > > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "lantiq,external-clock")) > > Just curious, is this property correct? I can't find it and wonder if > this is dead code (always disabling the clock)... I'm probably missing > something obvious :/ > > > clk_enable(clk_external); > > else > > clk_disable(clk_external); The (whole) binding does seem to be undocumented, at least a quick grep didn't find anything for "lantiq,pci-xway" in bindings :-/ The property itself is used in OpenWrt though, e.g. https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/lantiq/files/arch/mips/boot/dts/lantiq/danube_arcadyan_arv7518pw.dts#L209 Regards Jonas
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.