From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Instead SVA drivers can use a simple global IDA to allocate PASIDs for
each mm_struct.
Future work would be to allow drivers using the SVA APIs to reserve global
PASIDs from this IDA for their internal use, eg with the DMA API PASID
support.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
---
v5:
- Put removing iommu_sva_find() to a separate patch (Kevin)
- Make pasid allocation range to be inclusive (Tina)
- Simplified return code handling (Baolu)
v4:
- Keep GFP_ATOMIC flag for PASID allocation, will changed to
GFP_KERNEL in a separate patch.
---
drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 42 +++++++++++++--------------------------
drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
index 4f357ef14f04..b75711bdbe97 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
@@ -9,47 +9,33 @@
#include "iommu-sva.h"
static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_sva_lock);
-static DECLARE_IOASID_SET(iommu_sva_pasid);
+static DEFINE_IDA(iommu_global_pasid_ida);
-/**
- * iommu_sva_alloc_pasid - Allocate a PASID for the mm
- * @mm: the mm
- * @min: minimum PASID value (inclusive)
- * @max: maximum PASID value (inclusive)
- *
- * Try to allocate a PASID for this mm, or take a reference to the existing one
- * provided it fits within the [@min, @max] range. On success the PASID is
- * available in mm->pasid and will be available for the lifetime of the mm.
- *
- * Returns 0 on success and < 0 on error.
- */
-int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
+static int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
{
int ret = 0;
- ioasid_t pasid;
- if (min == INVALID_IOASID || max == INVALID_IOASID ||
- min == 0 || max < min)
+ if (!pasid_valid(min) || !pasid_valid(max) ||
+ min == 0 || max < min)
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&iommu_sva_lock);
/* Is a PASID already associated with this mm? */
if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
- if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid >= max)
+ if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid > max)
ret = -EOVERFLOW;
goto out;
}
- pasid = ioasid_alloc(&iommu_sva_pasid, min, max, mm);
- if (!pasid_valid(pasid))
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- else
- mm->pasid = pasid;
+ ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, min, max, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+ mm->pasid = ret;
+ ret = 0;
out:
mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock);
return ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_alloc_pasid);
/**
* iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device
@@ -221,8 +207,8 @@ iommu_sva_handle_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, void *data)
void mm_pasid_drop(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
- ioasid_free(mm->pasid);
- mm->pasid = INVALID_IOASID;
- }
+ if (likely(!pasid_valid(mm->pasid)))
+ return;
+
+ ida_free(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, mm->pasid);
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
index 102eae1817a2..c22d0174ad61 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
@@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
#include <linux/ioasid.h>
#include <linux/mm_types.h>
-int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max);
-
/* I/O Page fault */
struct device;
struct iommu_fault;
--
2.25.1
On 3/10/23 6:21 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>
> Instead SVA drivers can use a simple global IDA to allocate PASIDs for
> each mm_struct.
>
> Future work would be to allow drivers using the SVA APIs to reserve global
> PASIDs from this IDA for their internal use, eg with the DMA API PASID
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v5:
> - Put removing iommu_sva_find() to a separate patch (Kevin)
> - Make pasid allocation range to be inclusive (Tina)
> - Simplified return code handling (Baolu)
> v4:
> - Keep GFP_ATOMIC flag for PASID allocation, will changed to
> GFP_KERNEL in a separate patch.
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 42 +++++++++++++--------------------------
> drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> index 4f357ef14f04..b75711bdbe97 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> @@ -9,47 +9,33 @@
> #include "iommu-sva.h"
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_sva_lock);
> -static DECLARE_IOASID_SET(iommu_sva_pasid);
> +static DEFINE_IDA(iommu_global_pasid_ida);
>
> -/**
> - * iommu_sva_alloc_pasid - Allocate a PASID for the mm
> - * @mm: the mm
> - * @min: minimum PASID value (inclusive)
> - * @max: maximum PASID value (inclusive)
> - *
> - * Try to allocate a PASID for this mm, or take a reference to the existing one
> - * provided it fits within the [@min, @max] range. On success the PASID is
> - * available in mm->pasid and will be available for the lifetime of the mm.
> - *
> - * Returns 0 on success and < 0 on error.
> - */
> -int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
> +static int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> - ioasid_t pasid;
>
> - if (min == INVALID_IOASID || max == INVALID_IOASID ||
> - min == 0 || max < min)
> + if (!pasid_valid(min) || !pasid_valid(max) ||
> + min == 0 || max < min)
No need to change above line.
> return -EINVAL;
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu_sva_lock);
> /* Is a PASID already associated with this mm? */
> if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
> - if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid >= max)
> + if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid > max)
I forgot why do we need to change above line. But it's better to put
some comments there so that people don't need to dive into
ioasid_alloc() to know the inclusion or exclusion of @min or @max.
> ret = -EOVERFLOW;
> goto out;
> }
>
> - pasid = ioasid_alloc(&iommu_sva_pasid, min, max, mm);
> - if (!pasid_valid(pasid))
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - else
> - mm->pasid = pasid;
> + ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, min, max, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out;
> + mm->pasid = ret;
> + ret = 0;
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock);
> return ret;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_alloc_pasid);
>
> /**
> * iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device
> @@ -221,8 +207,8 @@ iommu_sva_handle_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault, void *data)
>
> void mm_pasid_drop(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> - if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
> - ioasid_free(mm->pasid);
> - mm->pasid = INVALID_IOASID;
> - }
> + if (likely(!pasid_valid(mm->pasid)))
> + return;
> +
> + ida_free(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, mm->pasid);
Any reason why do you drop "mm->pasid = INVALID_IOASID;" here?
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
> index 102eae1817a2..c22d0174ad61 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
> @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
> #include <linux/ioasid.h>
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>
> -int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max);
> -
> /* I/O Page fault */
> struct device;
> struct iommu_fault;
Best regards,
baolu
Hi Baolu,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 13:07:51 +0800, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
wrote:
> On 3/10/23 6:21 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Instead SVA drivers can use a simple global IDA to allocate PASIDs for
> > each mm_struct.
> >
> > Future work would be to allow drivers using the SVA APIs to reserve
> > global PASIDs from this IDA for their internal use, eg with the DMA API
> > PASID support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > v5:
> > - Put removing iommu_sva_find() to a separate patch (Kevin)
> > - Make pasid allocation range to be inclusive (Tina)
> > - Simplified return code handling (Baolu)
> > v4:
> > - Keep GFP_ATOMIC flag for PASID allocation, will changed to
> > GFP_KERNEL in a separate patch.
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 42 +++++++++++++--------------------------
> > drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h | 2 --
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> > index 4f357ef14f04..b75711bdbe97 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> > @@ -9,47 +9,33 @@
> > #include "iommu-sva.h"
> >
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_sva_lock);
> > -static DECLARE_IOASID_SET(iommu_sva_pasid);
> > +static DEFINE_IDA(iommu_global_pasid_ida);
> >
> > -/**
> > - * iommu_sva_alloc_pasid - Allocate a PASID for the mm
> > - * @mm: the mm
> > - * @min: minimum PASID value (inclusive)
> > - * @max: maximum PASID value (inclusive)
> > - *
> > - * Try to allocate a PASID for this mm, or take a reference to the
> > existing one
> > - * provided it fits within the [@min, @max] range. On success the
> > PASID is
> > - * available in mm->pasid and will be available for the lifetime of
> > the mm.
> > - *
> > - * Returns 0 on success and < 0 on error.
> > - */
> > -int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t
> > max) +static int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t
> > min, ioasid_t max) {
> > int ret = 0;
> > - ioasid_t pasid;
> >
> > - if (min == INVALID_IOASID || max == INVALID_IOASID ||
> > - min == 0 || max < min)
> > + if (!pasid_valid(min) || !pasid_valid(max) ||
> > + min == 0 || max < min)
>
> No need to change above line.
>
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&iommu_sva_lock);
> > /* Is a PASID already associated with this mm? */
> > if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
> > - if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid >= max)
> > + if (mm->pasid < min || mm->pasid > max)
>
> I forgot why do we need to change above line. But it's better to put
> some comments there so that people don't need to dive into
> ioasid_alloc() to know the inclusion or exclusion of @min or @max.
>
just to be consistent for both limits. sure, we can add the comment.
> > ret = -EOVERFLOW;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - pasid = ioasid_alloc(&iommu_sva_pasid, min, max, mm);
> > - if (!pasid_valid(pasid))
> > - ret = -ENOMEM;
> > - else
> > - mm->pasid = pasid;
> > + ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, min, max,
> > GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out;
> > + mm->pasid = ret;
> > + ret = 0;
> > out:
> > mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_alloc_pasid);
> >
> > /**
> > * iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device
> > @@ -221,8 +207,8 @@ iommu_sva_handle_iopf(struct iommu_fault *fault,
> > void *data)
> > void mm_pasid_drop(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > {
> > - if (pasid_valid(mm->pasid)) {
> > - ioasid_free(mm->pasid);
> > - mm->pasid = INVALID_IOASID;
> > - }
> > + if (likely(!pasid_valid(mm->pasid)))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + ida_free(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, mm->pasid);
>
> Any reason why do you drop "mm->pasid = INVALID_IOASID;" here?
>
mm_drop is called when mm gets released because "mm_count" becomes zero. so
there is no more mm_users. No one will see mm->pasid after this.
On the other hand, iommu_sva_bind_device() needs to hold mm_users refcount
so it won;t happen after mm_drop.
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
> > index 102eae1817a2..c22d0174ad61 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.h
> > @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
> > #include <linux/ioasid.h>
> > #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> >
> > -int iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm, ioasid_t min, ioasid_t
> > max); -
> > /* I/O Page fault */
> > struct device;
> > struct iommu_fault;
>
> Best regards,
> baolu
Thanks,
Jacob
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.