[PATCH] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix validate combined sequence

Krishna Yarlagadda posted 1 patch 2 years, 6 months ago
drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix validate combined sequence
Posted by Krishna Yarlagadda 2 years, 6 months ago
Check for non dma transfers that do not fit in FIFO has issue and skips
combined sequence for Tegra234 & Tegra241 which does not have GPCDMA.

Fixes: 1b8342cc4a38 ("spi: tegra210-quad: combined sequence mode")

Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c
index 2291effc2c44..39dec2dc161b 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra210-quad.c
@@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@ static bool tegra_qspi_validate_cmb_seq(struct tegra_qspi *tqspi,
 	if (xfer->len > 4 || xfer->len < 3)
 		return false;
 	xfer = list_next_entry(xfer, transfer_list);
-	if (!tqspi->soc_data->has_dma || xfer->len > (QSPI_FIFO_DEPTH << 2))
+	if (!tqspi->soc_data->has_dma && xfer->len > (QSPI_FIFO_DEPTH << 2))
 		return false;
 
 	return true;
-- 
2.17.1
Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix validate combined sequence
Posted by Mark Brown 2 years, 6 months ago
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 22:10:34 +0530, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> Check for non dma transfers that do not fit in FIFO has issue and skips
> combined sequence for Tegra234 & Tegra241 which does not have GPCDMA.
> 
> Fixes: 1b8342cc4a38 ("spi: tegra210-quad: combined sequence mode")
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: tegra210-quad: Fix validate combined sequence
      commit: 047ee71ae4f412d8819e39e4b08c588fa299cfc2

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark