This is kernel code, so specifying "kernel" is redundant. Let's simplify
things and just call it to_errno().
Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>
---
rust/kernel/error.rs | 2 +-
rust/macros/module.rs | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/error.rs b/rust/kernel/error.rs
index 5b9751d7ff1d..35894fa35efe 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/error.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/error.rs
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ pub struct Error(core::ffi::c_int);
impl Error {
/// Returns the kernel error code.
- pub fn to_kernel_errno(self) -> core::ffi::c_int {
+ pub fn to_errno(self) -> core::ffi::c_int {
self.0
}
}
diff --git a/rust/macros/module.rs b/rust/macros/module.rs
index a7e363c2b044..143336543866 100644
--- a/rust/macros/module.rs
+++ b/rust/macros/module.rs
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ pub(crate) fn module(ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
return 0;
}}
Err(e) => {{
- return e.to_kernel_errno();
+ return e.to_errno();
}}
}}
}}
--
2.40.0
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:04:33 +0900
Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net> wrote:
> This is kernel code, so specifying "kernel" is redundant. Let's simplify
> things and just call it to_errno().
>
> Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>
Thanks Lina for implementing my suggestion.
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> ---
> rust/kernel/error.rs | 2 +-
> rust/macros/module.rs | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/error.rs b/rust/kernel/error.rs
> index 5b9751d7ff1d..35894fa35efe 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/error.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/error.rs
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ pub struct Error(core::ffi::c_int);
>
> impl Error {
> /// Returns the kernel error code.
> - pub fn to_kernel_errno(self) -> core::ffi::c_int {
> + pub fn to_errno(self) -> core::ffi::c_int {
> self.0
> }
> }
> diff --git a/rust/macros/module.rs b/rust/macros/module.rs
> index a7e363c2b044..143336543866 100644
> --- a/rust/macros/module.rs
> +++ b/rust/macros/module.rs
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ pub(crate) fn module(ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
> return 0;
> }}
> Err(e) => {{
> - return e.to_kernel_errno();
> + return e.to_errno();
> }}
> }}
> }}
>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:32 PM Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> wrote: > > Thanks Lina for implementing my suggestion. I will add a `Suggested-by: you` too when I apply this, shout if you don't want it! Cheers, Miguel
On 3/29/23 09:04, Asahi Lina wrote:
> This is kernel code, so specifying "kernel" is redundant. Let's simplify
> things and just call it to_errno().
>
> Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <lina@asahilina.net>
> ---
> rust/kernel/error.rs | 2 +-
> rust/macros/module.rs | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/error.rs b/rust/kernel/error.rs
> index 5b9751d7ff1d..35894fa35efe 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/error.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/error.rs
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ pub struct Error(core::ffi::c_int);
>
> impl Error {
> /// Returns the kernel error code.
> - pub fn to_kernel_errno(self) -> core::ffi::c_int {
> + pub fn to_errno(self) -> core::ffi::c_int {
> self.0
> }
> }
> diff --git a/rust/macros/module.rs b/rust/macros/module.rs
> index a7e363c2b044..143336543866 100644
> --- a/rust/macros/module.rs
> +++ b/rust/macros/module.rs
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ pub(crate) fn module(ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
> return 0;
> }}
> Err(e) => {{
> - return e.to_kernel_errno();
> + return e.to_errno();
> }}
> }}
> }}
>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 4:47 PM Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> wrote: > > Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo These (in the different patches) are supposed to have <yakoyoku@gmail.com> email when I take them, right? (no need to resend them) Cheers, Miguel
On 3/29/23 12:04, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 4:47 PM Martin Rodriguez Reboredo > <yakoyoku@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo > > These (in the different patches) are supposed to have > <yakoyoku@gmail.com> email when I take them, right? (no need to resend > them) > > Cheers, > Miguel Ah, yes, they were supposed to have my email with it. I wasn't that livened up when I sent them. Thanks -> Martin
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:16 PM Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ah, yes, they were supposed to have my email with it. I wasn't that > livened up when I sent them. No problem at all! And thanks for reviewing! Cheers, Miguel
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.