MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ init/Kconfig | 4 ++++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 12 ++++++++++-- scripts/pahole-flags.sh | 2 +- scripts/pahole-version.sh | 13 +++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100755 scripts/pahole-version.sh
From: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> Can we please pick this series up for 5.15? I am particularly interested in the last patch to enable BTF + DWARF5, but the cleanup patches before are a very reasonable choice for stable@ as well as they simplify the pahole version calculation and allow future BTF/pahole related patches to apply cleanly as well. I intentionally kept the config PAHOLE_HAS_BTF_TAG and hence its patch complete, even though there is no user for it. Cheers, Matthias Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.15+ Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> Nathan Chancellor (5): MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF section kbuild: Add CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION scripts/pahole-flags.sh: Use pahole-version.sh lib/Kconfig.debug: Use CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION lib/Kconfig.debug: Allow BTF + DWARF5 with pahole 1.21+ MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ init/Kconfig | 4 ++++ lib/Kconfig.debug | 12 ++++++++++-- scripts/pahole-flags.sh | 2 +- scripts/pahole-version.sh | 13 +++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100755 scripts/pahole-version.sh -- 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:37AM +0000, maennich@google.com wrote: > From: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> > > Can we please pick this series up for 5.15? I am particularly interested > in the last patch to enable BTF + DWARF5, but the cleanup patches before > are a very reasonable choice for stable@ as well as they simplify the > pahole version calculation and allow future BTF/pahole related patches > to apply cleanly as well. I intentionally kept the config > PAHOLE_HAS_BTF_TAG and hence its patch complete, even though there is no > user for it. What are the upstream git commit ids for these changes? thanks, greg k-h
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:26 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:21:37AM +0000, maennich@google.com wrote: > > From: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> > > > > Can we please pick this series up for 5.15? I am particularly interested > > in the last patch to enable BTF + DWARF5, but the cleanup patches before > > are a very reasonable choice for stable@ as well as they simplify the > > pahole version calculation and allow future BTF/pahole related patches > > to apply cleanly as well. I intentionally kept the config > > PAHOLE_HAS_BTF_TAG and hence its patch complete, even though there is no > > user for it. > > What are the upstream git commit ids for these changes? Sorry, they should have been part of the commit message ... here they are f67644b4f282d42acf5ad9b0175ef5671314ab12 ("MAINTAINERS: Add scripts/pahole-flags.sh to BPF section") 613fe169237785a4bb1d06397b52606b2967da53 ("kbuild: Add CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION") 2d6c9810eb8915c4ddede707b8e167a1d919e1ca ("scripts/pahole-flags.sh: Use pahole-version.sh") 6323c81350b73a4569cf52df85f80273faa64071 ("lib/Kconfig.debug: Use CONFIG_PAHOLE_VERSION") 42d9b379e3e1790eafb87c799c9edfd0b37a37c7 ("lib/Kconfig.debug: Allow BTF + DWARF5 with pahole 1.21+") Cheers, Matthias > > thanks, > > greg k-h
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.