Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
index be18b161959b..43a841d4e94d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
@@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - mediatek,mt8186-mali
+ - const: mediatek,mt8183b-mali
+ - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
- items:
- enum:
- amlogic,meson-g12a-mali
--
2.39.2On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote: > > Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible. > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml > index be18b161959b..43a841d4e94d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml > @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ properties: > > compatible: > oneOf: > + - items: > + - enum: > + - mediatek,mt8186-mali > + - const: mediatek,mt8183b-mali > + - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable The MT8186 has Mali-G52 MC2 2EE, while the MT8183 has Mali-G72 MP3. So we actually need a new entry with two power domains. Our downstream Mali driver & DT use just that. ChenYu
Il 22/02/23 09:37, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>> index be18b161959b..43a841d4e94d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ properties:
>>
>> compatible:
>> oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - mediatek,mt8186-mali
>> + - const: mediatek,mt8183b-mali
>> + - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
>
> The MT8186 has Mali-G52 MC2 2EE, while the MT8183 has Mali-G72 MP3.
Keeping in mind the obvious - which is that G52 and G72 are both Bifrost....
> So we actually need a new entry with two power domains.
>
...This is my node for MT8186:
gpu: gpu@13040000 {
compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-mali",
"mediatek,mt8183b-mali",
"arm,mali-bifrost";
reg = <0 0x13040000 0 0x4000>;
clocks = <&mfgsys CLK_MFG_BG3D>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 276 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
<GIC_SPI 275 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
<GIC_SPI 274 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
interrupt-names = "job", "mmu", "gpu";
power-domains = <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG1>,
<&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG2>,
<&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG3>;
power-domain-names = "core0", "core1", "core2";
/* Please ignore speedbin, that's for another time :-) */
nvmem-cells = <&gpu_volt_bin>;
nvmem-cell-names = "speed-bin";
#cooling-cells = <2>;
};
There are three MFG power domains... MFG2 and MFG3 are parents of MFG1, on that
I agree, but we can avoid adding a new entry just for MT8186 and use the MT8183-b
one while still being technically correct.
Besides, Mali G52 and Mali G72 are both Bifrost... so I don't think that this
commit is incorrect. For the sake of simplicity, I would push on getting this
one picked.
Unless there are any real-strong opinions against...
Regards,
Angelo
> Our downstream Mali driver & DT use just that.
>
> ChenYu
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:13 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Il 22/02/23 09:37, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> >> index be18b161959b..43a841d4e94d 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
> >> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ properties:
> >>
> >> compatible:
> >> oneOf:
> >> + - items:
> >> + - enum:
> >> + - mediatek,mt8186-mali
> >> + - const: mediatek,mt8183b-mali
> >> + - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
> >
> > The MT8186 has Mali-G52 MC2 2EE, while the MT8183 has Mali-G72 MP3.
>
> Keeping in mind the obvious - which is that G52 and G72 are both Bifrost....
>
> > So we actually need a new entry with two power domains.
> >
>
> ...This is my node for MT8186:
>
> gpu: gpu@13040000 {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-mali",
> "mediatek,mt8183b-mali",
> "arm,mali-bifrost";
> reg = <0 0x13040000 0 0x4000>;
>
> clocks = <&mfgsys CLK_MFG_BG3D>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 276 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> <GIC_SPI 275 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
> <GIC_SPI 274 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> interrupt-names = "job", "mmu", "gpu";
> power-domains = <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG1>,
> <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG2>,
> <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG3>;
> power-domain-names = "core0", "core1", "core2";
>
> /* Please ignore speedbin, that's for another time :-) */
> nvmem-cells = <&gpu_volt_bin>;
> nvmem-cell-names = "speed-bin";
> #cooling-cells = <2>;
> };
>
> There are three MFG power domains... MFG2 and MFG3 are parents of MFG1, on that
> I agree, but we can avoid adding a new entry just for MT8186 and use the MT8183-b
> one while still being technically correct.
>
> Besides, Mali G52 and Mali G72 are both Bifrost... so I don't think that this
> commit is incorrect. For the sake of simplicity, I would push on getting this
> one picked.
I'm aware. In case it wasn't obvious, Mali-G52 MC2 2EE has 2 cores, while
Mali-G72 MP3 has 3 cores. I think that is reason enough to do a new entry.
Otherwise you are describing power domains for 3 cores for a GPU that only
has two.
> Unless there are any real-strong opinions against...
Yes.
ChenYu
Il 23/02/23 03:43, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:13 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Il 22/02/23 09:37, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:37 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
>>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Get GPU support on MT8186 by adding its compatible.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>>>> index be18b161959b..43a841d4e94d 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml
>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ properties:
>>>>
>>>> compatible:
>>>> oneOf:
>>>> + - items:
>>>> + - enum:
>>>> + - mediatek,mt8186-mali
>>>> + - const: mediatek,mt8183b-mali
>>>> + - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable
>>>
>>> The MT8186 has Mali-G52 MC2 2EE, while the MT8183 has Mali-G72 MP3.
>>
>> Keeping in mind the obvious - which is that G52 and G72 are both Bifrost....
>>
>>> So we actually need a new entry with two power domains.
>>>
>>
>> ...This is my node for MT8186:
>>
>> gpu: gpu@13040000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-mali",
>> "mediatek,mt8183b-mali",
>> "arm,mali-bifrost";
>> reg = <0 0x13040000 0 0x4000>;
>>
>> clocks = <&mfgsys CLK_MFG_BG3D>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 276 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
>> <GIC_SPI 275 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>,
>> <GIC_SPI 274 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>> interrupt-names = "job", "mmu", "gpu";
>> power-domains = <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG1>,
>> <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG2>,
>> <&spm MT8186_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG3>;
>> power-domain-names = "core0", "core1", "core2";
>>
>> /* Please ignore speedbin, that's for another time :-) */
>> nvmem-cells = <&gpu_volt_bin>;
>> nvmem-cell-names = "speed-bin";
>> #cooling-cells = <2>;
>> };
>>
>> There are three MFG power domains... MFG2 and MFG3 are parents of MFG1, on that
>> I agree, but we can avoid adding a new entry just for MT8186 and use the MT8183-b
>> one while still being technically correct.
>>
>> Besides, Mali G52 and Mali G72 are both Bifrost... so I don't think that this
>> commit is incorrect. For the sake of simplicity, I would push on getting this
>> one picked.
>
> I'm aware. In case it wasn't obvious, Mali-G52 MC2 2EE has 2 cores, while
> Mali-G72 MP3 has 3 cores. I think that is reason enough to do a new entry.
> Otherwise you are describing power domains for 3 cores for a GPU that only
> has two.
>
>> Unless there are any real-strong opinions against...
>
> Yes.
>
Ok, I will do that for v3!
Cheers,
Angelo
> ChenYu
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.