Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig

between commit:

  85d81e15862a ("arm64: defconfig: Enable DisplayPort on SC8280XP laptops")

from the qcom tree and commit:

  1f6d59f7f82d ("arm64: defconfig: Enable UCSI support")

from the usb tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 989183c76ae0,7eb5b6df594e..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@@ -936,8 -922,8 +936,9 @@@ CONFIG_USB_SERIAL=
  CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_CP210X=m
  CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_FTDI_SIO=m
  CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_OPTION=m
 +CONFIG_USB_QCOM_EUD=m
  CONFIG_USB_HSIC_USB3503=y
+ CONFIG_USB_ONBOARD_HUB=m
  CONFIG_NOP_USB_XCEIV=y
  CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
  CONFIG_USB_RENESAS_USBHS_UDC=m
@@@ -960,7 -946,8 +961,9 @@@ CONFIG_TYPEC_TCPCI=
  CONFIG_TYPEC_FUSB302=m
  CONFIG_TYPEC_TPS6598X=m
  CONFIG_TYPEC_HD3SS3220=m
 +CONFIG_TYPEC_MUX_GPIO_SBU=m
+ CONFIG_TYPEC_UCSI=m
+ CONFIG_UCSI_CCG=m
  CONFIG_MMC=y
  CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_MINORS=32
  CONFIG_MMC_ARMMMCI=y

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:47 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>
> between commit:
>
>   85d81e15862a ("arm64: defconfig: Enable DisplayPort on SC8280XP laptops")
>
> from the qcom tree and commit:
>
>   1f6d59f7f82d ("arm64: defconfig: Enable UCSI support")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks for your resolution!

> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@@ -960,7 -946,8 +961,9 @@@ CONFIG_TYPEC_TCPCI=
>   CONFIG_TYPEC_FUSB302=m
>   CONFIG_TYPEC_TPS6598X=m
>   CONFIG_TYPEC_HD3SS3220=m
>  +CONFIG_TYPEC_MUX_GPIO_SBU=m
> + CONFIG_TYPEC_UCSI=m
> + CONFIG_UCSI_CCG=m

CONFIG_TYPEC_MUX_GPIO_SBU=m should be last, cfr.
drivers/usb/typec/Kconfig:source "drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/Kconfig"
drivers/usb/typec/Kconfig:source "drivers/usb/typec/mux/Kconfig"

>   CONFIG_MMC=y
>   CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_MINORS=32
>   CONFIG_MMC_ARMMMCI=y

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 12:40:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   85d81e15862a ("arm64: defconfig: Enable DisplayPort on SC8280XP laptops")
> 
> from the qcom tree and commit:
> 
>   1f6d59f7f82d ("arm64: defconfig: Enable UCSI support")
> 
> from the usb tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Merge looks good, thanks!

greg k-h