From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Add functions to flush the caches and handle non-coherent DMA.
Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
[replace <asm/cacheflush.h> with <linux/cacheflush.h>]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
---
drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.h | 21 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
index 676468c35859..0062635d845f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.c
@@ -8,13 +8,16 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "CCACHE: " fmt
+#include <linux/align.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
#include <soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.h>
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DIRECCFIX_LOW 0x100
@@ -39,10 +42,14 @@
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_CONFIG_SETS_MASK GENMASK_ULL(23, 16)
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_CONFIG_BLKS_MASK GENMASK_ULL(31, 24)
+#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_FLUSH64 0x200
+#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_FLUSH32 0x240
+
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_WAYENABLE 0x08
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_ECCINJECTERR 0x40
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_MAX_ECCINTR 4
+#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_LINE_SIZE 64
static void __iomem *ccache_base;
static int g_irq[SIFIVE_CCACHE_MAX_ECCINTR];
@@ -125,6 +132,47 @@ int unregister_sifive_ccache_error_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_sifive_ccache_error_notifier);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
+static phys_addr_t uncached_offset;
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sifive_ccache_handle_noncoherent_key);
+
+void sifive_ccache_flush_range(phys_addr_t start, size_t len)
+{
+ phys_addr_t end = start + len;
+ phys_addr_t line;
+
+ if (!len)
+ return;
+
+ mb();
+ for (line = ALIGN_DOWN(start, SIFIVE_CCACHE_LINE_SIZE); line < end;
+ line += SIFIVE_CCACHE_LINE_SIZE) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
+ writel(line >> 4, ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_FLUSH32);
+#else
+ writeq(line, ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_FLUSH64);
+#endif
+ mb();
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sifive_ccache_flush_range);
+
+void *sifive_ccache_set_uncached(void *addr, size_t size)
+{
+ phys_addr_t phys_addr = __pa(addr) + uncached_offset;
+ void *mem_base;
+
+ mem_base = memremap(phys_addr, size, MEMREMAP_WT);
+ if (!mem_base) {
+ pr_err("%s memremap failed for addr %p\n", __func__, addr);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ return mem_base;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sifive_ccache_set_uncached);
+#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT */
+
static int ccache_largest_wayenabled(void)
{
return readl(ccache_base + SIFIVE_CCACHE_WAYENABLE) & 0xFF;
@@ -213,6 +261,7 @@ static int __init sifive_ccache_init(void)
int i, rc, intr_num;
const struct of_device_id *match;
unsigned long broken_irqs;
+ u64 __maybe_unused offset;
np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, sifive_ccache_ids, &match);
if (!np)
@@ -258,6 +307,15 @@ static int __init sifive_ccache_init(void)
}
of_node_put(np);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
+ if (!of_property_read_u64(np, "uncached-offset", &offset)) {
+ uncached_offset = offset;
+ static_branch_enable(&sifive_ccache_handle_noncoherent_key);
+ riscv_cbom_block_size = SIFIVE_CCACHE_LINE_SIZE;
+ riscv_noncoherent_supported();
+ }
+#endif
+
ccache_config_read();
ccache_cache_ops.get_priv_group = ccache_get_priv_group;
@@ -278,4 +336,4 @@ static int __init sifive_ccache_init(void)
return rc;
}
-device_initcall(sifive_ccache_init);
+arch_initcall(sifive_ccache_init);
diff --git a/include/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.h b/include/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.h
index 4d4ed49388a0..d349ccb3969b 100644
--- a/include/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.h
+++ b/include/soc/sifive/sifive_ccache.h
@@ -7,10 +7,31 @@
#ifndef __SOC_SIFIVE_CCACHE_H
#define __SOC_SIFIVE_CCACHE_H
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/jump_label.h>
+
extern int register_sifive_ccache_error_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
extern int unregister_sifive_ccache_error_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_ERR_TYPE_CE 0
#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_ERR_TYPE_UE 1
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sifive_ccache_handle_noncoherent_key);
+
+static inline bool sifive_ccache_handle_noncoherent(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SIFIVE_CCACHE
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&sifive_ccache_handle_noncoherent_key);
+#else
+ return false;
+#endif
+}
+
+void sifive_ccache_flush_range(phys_addr_t start, size_t len);
+void *sifive_ccache_set_uncached(void *addr, size_t size);
+static inline void sifive_ccache_clear_uncached(void *addr, size_t size)
+{
+ memunmap(addr);
+}
+
#endif /* __SOC_SIFIVE_CCACHE_H */
--
2.39.1
Emil, +CC Daire On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 05:18:13AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> > > Add functions to flush the caches and handle non-coherent DMA. > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> > [replace <asm/cacheflush.h> with <linux/cacheflush.h>] > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> > --- > +void *sifive_ccache_set_uncached(void *addr, size_t size) > +{ > + phys_addr_t phys_addr = __pa(addr) + uncached_offset; > + void *mem_base; > + > + mem_base = memremap(phys_addr, size, MEMREMAP_WT); > + if (!mem_base) { > + pr_err("%s memremap failed for addr %p\n", __func__, addr); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > + return mem_base; > +} The rest of this I either get b/c we did it, or will become moot so I amn't worried about it, but can you please explain this, in particular the memremap that you're doing here? Cheers, Conor.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 19:51, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > Emil, > > +CC Daire > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 05:18:13AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > > From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> > > > > Add functions to flush the caches and handle non-coherent DMA. > > > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> > > [replace <asm/cacheflush.h> with <linux/cacheflush.h>] > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> > > --- > > > +void *sifive_ccache_set_uncached(void *addr, size_t size) > > +{ > > + phys_addr_t phys_addr = __pa(addr) + uncached_offset; > > + void *mem_base; > > + > > + mem_base = memremap(phys_addr, size, MEMREMAP_WT); > > + if (!mem_base) { > > + pr_err("%s memremap failed for addr %p\n", __func__, addr); > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > + } > > + > > + return mem_base; > > +} > > The rest of this I either get b/c we did it, or will become moot so I > amn't worried about it, but can you please explain this, in particular > the memremap that you're doing here? No, I can't really. As we talked about it's also based on a prototype by Atish. I'm sure you know that the general idea is that we want to return a pointer that accesses the same physical memory, but through the uncached alias. I can't tell you exactly why it's done this way though, sorry. /Emil > Cheers, > Conor. > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 10:32:52PM +0100, Emil Renner Berthing wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 19:51, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Emil, > > > > +CC Daire > > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 05:18:13AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > > > From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> > > > > > > Add functions to flush the caches and handle non-coherent DMA. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> > > > [replace <asm/cacheflush.h> with <linux/cacheflush.h>] > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> > > > --- > > > > > +void *sifive_ccache_set_uncached(void *addr, size_t size) > > > +{ > > > + phys_addr_t phys_addr = __pa(addr) + uncached_offset; > > > + void *mem_base; > > > + > > > + mem_base = memremap(phys_addr, size, MEMREMAP_WT); > > > + if (!mem_base) { > > > + pr_err("%s memremap failed for addr %p\n", __func__, addr); > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > > + } > > > + > > > + return mem_base; > > > +} > > > > The rest of this I either get b/c we did it, or will become moot so I > > amn't worried about it, but can you please explain this, in particular > > the memremap that you're doing here? > > No, I can't really. As we talked about it's also based on a prototype > by Atish. I'm sure you know that the general idea is that we want to > return a pointer that accesses the same physical memory, but through > the uncached alias. Yah, I follow all the rest of what's going on - it's just this bit of it that I don't. > I can't tell you exactly why it's done this way > though, sorry. I had a bit of a look on lore, but don't really see anything there that contained any discussion of what was going on here. Adding Atish in the off-chance that he remembers!
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.