Try to (partially) fix the issue reported in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230128020051.2328465-1-liaoyu15@huawei.com/

Frederic Weisbecker (6):
  timers/nohz: Restructure and reshuffle struct tick_sched
  timers/nohz: Only ever update sleeptime from idle exit
  timers/nohz: Protect idle/iowait sleep time under seqcount
  timers/nohz: Add a comment about broken iowait counter update race
  timers/nohz: Remove middle-function __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick()
  MAINTAINERS: Remove stale email address

 MAINTAINERS              |   2 +-
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 kernel/time/tick-sched.h |  67 +++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:09:11PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Try to (partially) fix the issue reported in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230128020051.2328465-1-liaoyu15@huawei.com/
> 
> Frederic Weisbecker (6):
>   timers/nohz: Restructure and reshuffle struct tick_sched
>   timers/nohz: Only ever update sleeptime from idle exit
>   timers/nohz: Protect idle/iowait sleep time under seqcount
>   timers/nohz: Add a comment about broken iowait counter update race
>   timers/nohz: Remove middle-function __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick()
>   MAINTAINERS: Remove stale email address

Seem sensible enough.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

On Fri, Feb 10 2023 at 15:09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Try to (partially) fix the issue reported in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230128020051.2328465-1-liaoyu15@huawei.com/

Looks about right. Can you please remove that assert in the selftest
which started all this?

Thanks,

        tglx