MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers.
Add a phandle to this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and
includes in watchdog driver code.
Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
---
.../bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
index b2b17fdf4..3c545065f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
@@ -14,11 +14,18 @@ allOf:
properties:
compatible:
- const: mediatek,mt7621-wdt
+ items:
+ - const: mediatek,mt7621-wdt
+ - const: syscon
reg:
maxItems: 1
+ ralink,sysctl:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+ description:
+ phandle of syscon used to control system registers
+
required:
- compatible
- reg
@@ -28,6 +35,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
watchdog@100 {
- compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-wdt";
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt7621-wdt", "syscon";
reg = <0x100 0x100>;
+ ralink,sysctl = <&sysc>;
};
--
2.25.1
On 10/02/2023 07:56, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers. > Add a phandle to this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and I don't understand this part. You claim you add a phandle to this node, but your binding suggest you add here a phandle to other node. > includes in watchdog driver code. > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com> > --- > .../bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml | 12 ++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml > index b2b17fdf4..3c545065f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml > @@ -14,11 +14,18 @@ allOf: > > properties: > compatible: > - const: mediatek,mt7621-wdt > + items: > + - const: mediatek,mt7621-wdt > + - const: syscon > > reg: > maxItems: 1 > > + ralink,sysctl: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: > + phandle of syscon used to control system registers This needs to be more specific - which syscon? It also does not fit your commit msg. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2023 07:56, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers.
> > Add a phandle to this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and
>
> I don't understand this part. You claim you add a phandle to this node,
> but your binding suggest you add here a phandle to other node.
Probably my English is not the best here :-). Yes, you are right, I
just want to add a phandle to the 'sysc' node in the current node.
>
> > includes in watchdog driver code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
> > index b2b17fdf4..3c545065f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mediatek,mt7621-wdt.yaml
> > @@ -14,11 +14,18 @@ allOf:
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > - const: mediatek,mt7621-wdt
> > + items:
> > + - const: mediatek,mt7621-wdt
> > + - const: syscon
> >
> > reg:
> > maxItems: 1
> >
> > + ralink,sysctl:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > + description:
> > + phandle of syscon used to control system registers
>
> This needs to be more specific - which syscon? It also does not fit your
> commit msg.
Sure. How about "phandle to system controller 'sysc' syscon node which
controls system registers".
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Sergio Paracuellos
On 10/02/2023 12:22, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 10/02/2023 07:56, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: >>> MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers. >>> Add a phandle to this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and >> >> I don't understand this part. You claim you add a phandle to this node, >> but your binding suggest you add here a phandle to other node. > > Probably my English is not the best here :-). Yes, you are right, I > just want to add a phandle to the 'sysc' node in the current node. Then why do you need syscon compatible here? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:27 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2023 12:22, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/02/2023 07:56, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> >>> MT7621 SoC provides a system controller node for accessing to some registers.
> >>> Add a phandle to this node to avoid using MIPS related arch operations and
> >>
> >> I don't understand this part. You claim you add a phandle to this node,
> >> but your binding suggest you add here a phandle to other node.
> >
> > Probably my English is not the best here :-). Yes, you are right, I
> > just want to add a phandle to the 'sysc' node in the current node.
>
> Then why do you need syscon compatible here?
Clear now. Will drop that in v2.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Sergio Paracuellos
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.