drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the
dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper
that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning:
drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
^
drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
^
Convert this to the new RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper that so this
is not required. To improve this further, also use the pm_ptr()
helper that lets the dev_pm_ops get dropped entirely when
CONFIG_PM is disabled.
A related mistake happened in the of_match_ptr() macro here, which
like SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() requires the match table to be marked
as __maybe_unused, though I could not reproduce building this without
CONFIG_OF. Remove the of_match_ptr() here as there is no point in
dropping the match table in configurations without CONFIG_OF.
Fixes: 02852c01f654 ("media: i2c: imx290: Initialize runtime PM before subdev")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
index 49d6c8bdec41..48ae2e0adf9e 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
}
static const struct dev_pm_ops imx290_pm_ops = {
- SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
+ RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
};
/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1362,8 +1362,8 @@ static struct i2c_driver imx290_i2c_driver = {
.remove = imx290_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "imx290",
- .pm = &imx290_pm_ops,
- .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(imx290_of_match),
+ .pm = pm_ptr(&imx290_pm_ops),
+ .of_match_table = imx290_of_match,
},
};
--
2.39.1
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the
> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper
> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning:
>
> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> ^
> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> ^
>
> Convert this to the new RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper that so this
> is not required. To improve this further, also use the pm_ptr()
> helper that lets the dev_pm_ops get dropped entirely when
> CONFIG_PM is disabled.
>
> A related mistake happened in the of_match_ptr() macro here, which
> like SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() requires the match table to be marked
> as __maybe_unused, though I could not reproduce building this without
> CONFIG_OF. Remove the of_match_ptr() here as there is no point in
> dropping the match table in configurations without CONFIG_OF.
>
> Fixes: 02852c01f654 ("media: i2c: imx290: Initialize runtime PM before subdev")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Mani
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> index 49d6c8bdec41..48ae2e0adf9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops imx290_pm_ops = {
> - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
> + RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
> };
>
> /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -1362,8 +1362,8 @@ static struct i2c_driver imx290_i2c_driver = {
> .remove = imx290_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "imx290",
> - .pm = &imx290_pm_ops,
> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(imx290_of_match),
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&imx290_pm_ops),
> + .of_match_table = imx290_of_match,
> },
> };
>
> --
> 2.39.1
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Hi Arnd,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the
> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper
> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning:
>
> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> ^
> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> ^
>
> Convert this to the new RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper that so this
> is not required. To improve this further, also use the pm_ptr()
> helper that lets the dev_pm_ops get dropped entirely when
> CONFIG_PM is disabled.
>
> A related mistake happened in the of_match_ptr() macro here, which
> like SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() requires the match table to be marked
> as __maybe_unused, though I could not reproduce building this without
> CONFIG_OF. Remove the of_match_ptr() here as there is no point in
> dropping the match table in configurations without CONFIG_OF.
>
> Fixes: 02852c01f654 ("media: i2c: imx290: Initialize runtime PM before subdev")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> index 49d6c8bdec41..48ae2e0adf9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops imx290_pm_ops = {
> - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
> + RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
> };
>
> /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -1362,8 +1362,8 @@ static struct i2c_driver imx290_i2c_driver = {
> .remove = imx290_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "imx290",
> - .pm = &imx290_pm_ops,
> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(imx290_of_match),
> + .pm = pm_ptr(&imx290_pm_ops),
> + .of_match_table = imx290_of_match,
> },
> };
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the
>> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper
>> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning:
>>
>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> ^
>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> ^
>>
I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks
this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly
reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is
there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards
mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus?
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
#regzbot poke
>> Convert this to the new RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper that so this
>> is not required. To improve this further, also use the pm_ptr()
>> helper that lets the dev_pm_ops get dropped entirely when
>> CONFIG_PM is disabled.
>>
>> A related mistake happened in the of_match_ptr() macro here, which
>> like SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() requires the match table to be marked
>> as __maybe_unused, though I could not reproduce building this without
>> CONFIG_OF. Remove the of_match_ptr() here as there is no point in
>> dropping the match table in configurations without CONFIG_OF.
>>
>> Fixes: 02852c01f654 ("media: i2c: imx290: Initialize runtime PM before subdev")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
>> index 49d6c8bdec41..48ae2e0adf9e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
>> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> }
>>
>> static const struct dev_pm_ops imx290_pm_ops = {
>> - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
>> + RUNTIME_PM_OPS(imx290_runtime_suspend, imx290_runtime_resume, NULL)
>> };
>>
>> /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> @@ -1362,8 +1362,8 @@ static struct i2c_driver imx290_i2c_driver = {
>> .remove = imx290_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "imx290",
>> - .pm = &imx290_pm_ops,
>> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(imx290_of_match),
>> + .pm = pm_ptr(&imx290_pm_ops),
>> + .of_match_table = imx290_of_match,
>> },
>> };
>>
>
Hello, On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > >> > >> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the > >> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper > >> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning: > >> > >> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] > >> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > >> ^ > >> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] > >> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > >> ^ > >> > > I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks > this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly > reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is > there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards > mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus? Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in Mauro's tree now. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus
On 20.03.23 10:32, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >> On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>>> >>>> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the >>>> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper >>>> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning: >>>> >>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>> ^ >>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>> ^ >>>> >> >> I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks >> this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly >> reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is >> there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards >> mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus? > > Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in > Mauro's tree now. Ahh, great, many thx. I checked Linux-next before writing my mail, but didn't sport it there. :-/ Ciao, Thorsten
On 20.03.23 10:42, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 20.03.23 10:32, Sakari Ailus wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>> On 07.02.23 17:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 05:13:12PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>>>> >>>>> The runtime suspend/resume functions are only referenced from the >>>>> dev_pm_ops, but they use the old SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() helper >>>>> that requires a __maybe_unused annotation to avoid a warning: >>>>> >>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1082:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_resume' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>>> static int imx290_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>>> ^ >>>>> drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c:1090:12: error: unused function 'imx290_runtime_suspend' [-Werror,-Wunused-function] >>>>> static int imx290_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>> ^ >>>>> >>> >>> I might be missing something (if so, please tell me), but to me it looks >>> this fix for a build issue in 6.3-rc (which shows up in Guenters weekly >>> reports to Linus) didn't make any progress in the past few weeks. Is >>> there a reason why? Who actually needs to pick it up and send it towards >>> mainline? Manivannan Sadhasivam? Sakari Ailus? >> >> Mauro has recently pulled my PR including this and I understand it's in >> Mauro's tree now. > > Ahh, great, many thx. > > I checked Linux-next before writing my mail, but didn't sport it there. :-/ Argh, ohh no, it's there. Sorry for the noise. Second time something like this happens today. Seems today is not my best day. :-/ Ciao, Thorsten
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Argh, ohh no, it's there. Sorry for the noise. Second time something > like this happens today. Seems today is not my best day. :-/ No worries! -- Sakari Ailus
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.