Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
@@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
};
};
+ port@2 {
+ reg = <2>;
+ dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
+ };
+ };
+
};
mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
@@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
};
};
+ mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";
+ reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
+ <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
+ <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
+ <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
+ <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
+ interrupts = <12>;
+ clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
+ <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_AUX_CLK>,
+ <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK>,
+ <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_INTF_CLK>,
+ <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "core_iface",
+ "core_aux",
+ "ctrl_link",
+ "ctrl_link_iface",
+ "stream_pixel";
+
+ assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK_SRC>,
+ <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK_SRC>;
+ assigned-clock-parents = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_LINK_CLK>,
+ <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_VCO_DIV_CLK>;
+
+ phys = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_PHY>;
+ phy-names = "dp";
+
+ #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
+
+ operating-points-v2 = <&dp_opp_table>;
+ power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8450_MMCX>;
+
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ mdss_dp0_in: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf0_out>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+ dp_opp_table: opp-table {
+ compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+
+ opp-160000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <160000000>;
+ required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
+ };
+
+ opp-270000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <270000000>;
+ required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
+ };
+
+ opp-540000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <540000000>;
+ required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
+ };
+
+ opp-810000000 {
+ opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <810000000>;
+ required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
mdss_dsi0: dsi@ae94000 {
compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl", "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl";
reg = <0 0x0ae94000 0 0x400>;
--
2.34.1
On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node. > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi > @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint { > }; > }; > > + port@2 { > + reg = <2>; > + dpu_intf0_out: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>; > + }; > + }; > + > }; > > mdp_opp_table: opp-table { > @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 { > }; > }; > > + mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 { > + compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp"; Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries. > + reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>, > + <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>, > + <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>, > + <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>, > + <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>; While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes). > + interrupt-parent = <&mdss>; > + interrupts = <12>; > + clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>, > + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_AUX_CLK>, > + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK>, > + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_INTF_CLK>, > + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK>; > + clock-names = "core_iface", > + "core_aux", > + "ctrl_link", > + "ctrl_link_iface", > + "stream_pixel"; > + > + assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK_SRC>, > + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK_SRC>; > + assigned-clock-parents = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_LINK_CLK>, > + <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_VCO_DIV_CLK>; > + > + phys = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_PHY>; > + phy-names = "dp"; > + > + #sound-dai-cells = <0>; > + > + operating-points-v2 = <&dp_opp_table>; > + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8450_MMCX>; > + > + status = "disabled"; > + > + ports { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + port@0 { > + reg = <0>; > + mdss_dp0_in: endpoint { > + remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf0_out>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + > + dp_opp_table: opp-table { > + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > + > + opp-160000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <160000000>; > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>; > + }; > + > + opp-270000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <270000000>; > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>; > + }; > + > + opp-540000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <540000000>; > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>; > + }; > + > + opp-810000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <810000000>; > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + > mdss_dsi0: dsi@ae94000 { > compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl", "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl"; > reg = <0 0x0ae94000 0 0x400>; > -- With best wishes Dmitry
On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint { >> }; >> }; >> + port@2 { >> + reg = <2>; >> + dpu_intf0_out: endpoint { >> + remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> }; >> mdp_opp_table: opp-table { >> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 { >> }; >> }; >> + mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 { >> + compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp"; Exact, must fix. > > Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries. > >> + reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>, >> + <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>, >> + <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>, >> + <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>, >> + <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>; > > > While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes). I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system freezes when using even sizes, using the exact register size works fine. Neil > >> + interrupt-parent = <&mdss>; >> + interrupts = <12>; >> + clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>, >> + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_AUX_CLK>, >> + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK>, >> + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_INTF_CLK>, >> + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK>; >> + clock-names = "core_iface", >> + "core_aux", >> + "ctrl_link", >> + "ctrl_link_iface", >> + "stream_pixel"; >> + >> + assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK_SRC>, >> + <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK_SRC>; >> + assigned-clock-parents = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_LINK_CLK>, >> + <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_VCO_DIV_CLK>; >> + >> + phys = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_PHY>; >> + phy-names = "dp"; >> + >> + #sound-dai-cells = <0>; >> + >> + operating-points-v2 = <&dp_opp_table>; >> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8450_MMCX>; >> + >> + status = "disabled"; >> + >> + ports { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + >> + port@0 { >> + reg = <0>; >> + mdss_dp0_in: endpoint { >> + remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf0_out>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + dp_opp_table: opp-table { >> + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; >> + >> + opp-160000000 { >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <160000000>; >> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>; >> + }; >> + >> + opp-270000000 { >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <270000000>; >> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>; >> + }; >> + >> + opp-540000000 { >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <540000000>; >> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>; >> + }; >> + >> + opp-810000000 { >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <810000000>; >> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>; >> + }; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> mdss_dsi0: dsi@ae94000 { >> compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl", "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl"; >> reg = <0 0x0ae94000 0 0x400>; >> >
On 10/02/2023 17:28, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint { >>> }; >>> }; >>> + port@2 { >>> + reg = <2>; >>> + dpu_intf0_out: endpoint { >>> + remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>; >>> + }; >>> + }; >>> + >>> }; >>> mdp_opp_table: opp-table { >>> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 { >>> }; >>> }; >>> + mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 { >>> + compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp"; > > Exact, must fix. > >> >> Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd >> suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 >> and 8450 entries. >> >>> + reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>, >>> + <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>, >>> + <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>, >>> + <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>, >>> + <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>; >> >> >> While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, >> 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp >> uses even sizes). > > I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system > freezes when using even sizes, using > the exact register size works fine. Interesting. Could you please trace, what exactly makes it fail, since specifying bigger region size should not cause such issues. -- With best wishes Dmitry
On 10/02/2023 16:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 10/02/2023 17:28, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint { >>>> }; >>>> }; >>>> + port@2 { >>>> + reg = <2>; >>>> + dpu_intf0_out: endpoint { >>>> + remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>; >>>> + }; >>>> + }; >>>> + >>>> }; >>>> mdp_opp_table: opp-table { >>>> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 { >>>> }; >>>> }; >>>> + mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 { >>>> + compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp"; >> >> Exact, must fix. >> >>> >>> Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries. >>> >>>> + reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>, >>>> + <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>, >>>> + <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>, >>>> + <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>, >>>> + <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>; >>> >>> >>> While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes). >> >> I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system freezes when using even sizes, using >> the exact register size works fine. > > Interesting. Could you please trace, what exactly makes it fail, since specifying bigger region size should not cause such issues. Yep I'll trace what's happening. Neil >
On 13/02/2023 13:32, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > On 10/02/2023 16:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On 10/02/2023 17:28, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>> On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>>> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>>> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi >>>>> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint { >>>>> }; >>>>> }; >>>>> + port@2 { >>>>> + reg = <2>; >>>>> + dpu_intf0_out: endpoint { >>>>> + remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>; >>>>> + }; >>>>> + }; >>>>> + >>>>> }; >>>>> mdp_opp_table: opp-table { >>>>> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 { >>>>> }; >>>>> }; >>>>> + mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 { >>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp"; >>> >>> Exact, must fix. >>> >>>> >>>> Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries. >>>> >>>>> + reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>, >>>>> + <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>, >>>>> + <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>, >>>>> + <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>, >>>>> + <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>; >>>> >>>> >>>> While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes). >>> >>> I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system freezes when using even sizes, using >>> the exact register size works fine. >> >> Interesting. Could you please trace, what exactly makes it fail, since specifying bigger region size should not cause such issues. > > Yep I'll trace what's happening. OK weird, I tried with the same sizes as sm8350, and it works fine. Will resend with this fixed. Neil > > Neil > >> >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.