[PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller

Neil Armstrong posted 5 patches 2 years, 7 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller
Posted by Neil Armstrong 2 years, 7 months ago
Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.

Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
@@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
 						};
 					};
 
+					port@2 {
+						reg = <2>;
+						dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
+							remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
+						};
+					};
+
 				};
 
 				mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
@@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
 				};
 			};
 
+			mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
+				compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";
+				reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
+				      <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
+				      <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
+				      <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
+				      <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;
+				interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
+				interrupts = <12>;
+				clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
+					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_AUX_CLK>,
+					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK>,
+					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_INTF_CLK>,
+					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK>;
+				clock-names = "core_iface",
+					      "core_aux",
+					      "ctrl_link",
+			                      "ctrl_link_iface",
+					      "stream_pixel";
+
+				assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK_SRC>,
+						  <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK_SRC>;
+				assigned-clock-parents = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_LINK_CLK>,
+							 <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_VCO_DIV_CLK>;
+
+				phys = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_PHY>;
+			        phy-names = "dp";
+
+			        #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
+
+				operating-points-v2 = <&dp_opp_table>;
+				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8450_MMCX>;
+
+				status = "disabled";
+
+				ports {
+					#address-cells = <1>;
+					#size-cells = <0>;
+
+					port@0 {
+						reg = <0>;
+						mdss_dp0_in: endpoint {
+							remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf0_out>;
+						};
+					};
+				};
+
+				dp_opp_table: opp-table {
+					compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+
+					opp-160000000 {
+						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <160000000>;
+						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
+					};
+
+					opp-270000000 {
+						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <270000000>;
+						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
+					};
+
+					opp-540000000 {
+						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <540000000>;
+						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
+					};
+
+					opp-810000000 {
+						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <810000000>;
+						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
+					};
+				};
+			};
+
 			mdss_dsi0: dsi@ae94000 {
 				compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl", "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl";
 				reg = <0 0x0ae94000 0 0x400>;

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 2 years, 7 months ago
On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
>   						};
>   					};
>   
> +					port@2 {
> +						reg = <2>;
> +						dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
> +							remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
> +						};
> +					};
> +
>   				};
>   
>   				mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
>   				};
>   			};
>   
> +			mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
> +				compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";

Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd 
suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 
and 8450 entries.

> +				reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
> +				      <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
> +				      <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
> +				      <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
> +				      <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;


While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 
0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp 
uses even sizes).

> +				interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
> +				interrupts = <12>;
> +				clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_AUX_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_INTF_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK>;
> +				clock-names = "core_iface",
> +					      "core_aux",
> +					      "ctrl_link",
> +			                      "ctrl_link_iface",
> +					      "stream_pixel";
> +
> +				assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK_SRC>,
> +						  <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK_SRC>;
> +				assigned-clock-parents = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_LINK_CLK>,
> +							 <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_VCO_DIV_CLK>;
> +
> +				phys = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_PHY>;
> +			        phy-names = "dp";
> +
> +			        #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				operating-points-v2 = <&dp_opp_table>;
> +				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8450_MMCX>;
> +
> +				status = "disabled";
> +
> +				ports {
> +					#address-cells = <1>;
> +					#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +					port@0 {
> +						reg = <0>;
> +						mdss_dp0_in: endpoint {
> +							remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf0_out>;
> +						};
> +					};
> +				};
> +
> +				dp_opp_table: opp-table {
> +					compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +
> +					opp-160000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <160000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> +					};
> +
> +					opp-270000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <270000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
> +					};
> +
> +					opp-540000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <540000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> +					};
> +
> +					opp-810000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <810000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +
>   			mdss_dsi0: dsi@ae94000 {
>   				compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl", "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl";
>   				reg = <0 0x0ae94000 0 0x400>;
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller
Posted by Neil Armstrong 2 years, 7 months ago
On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
>>                           };
>>                       };
>> +                    port@2 {
>> +                        reg = <2>;
>> +                        dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
>> +                            remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
>> +                        };
>> +                    };
>> +
>>                   };
>>                   mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
>> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
>>                   };
>>               };
>> +            mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
>> +                compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";

Exact, must fix.

> 
> Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries.
> 
>> +                reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
>> +                      <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
>> +                      <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
>> +                      <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
>> +                      <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;
> 
> 
> While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes).

I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system freezes when using even sizes, using
the exact register size works fine.

Neil

> 
>> +                interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
>> +                interrupts = <12>;
>> +                clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
>> +                     <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_AUX_CLK>,
>> +                     <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK>,
>> +                     <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_INTF_CLK>,
>> +                     <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK>;
>> +                clock-names = "core_iface",
>> +                          "core_aux",
>> +                          "ctrl_link",
>> +                                  "ctrl_link_iface",
>> +                          "stream_pixel";
>> +
>> +                assigned-clocks = <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_LINK_CLK_SRC>,
>> +                          <&dispcc DISP_CC_MDSS_DPTX0_PIXEL0_CLK_SRC>;
>> +                assigned-clock-parents = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_LINK_CLK>,
>> +                             <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_VCO_DIV_CLK>;
>> +
>> +                phys = <&usb_1_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_DP_PHY>;
>> +                    phy-names = "dp";
>> +
>> +                    #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +                operating-points-v2 = <&dp_opp_table>;
>> +                power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8450_MMCX>;
>> +
>> +                status = "disabled";
>> +
>> +                ports {
>> +                    #address-cells = <1>;
>> +                    #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +                    port@0 {
>> +                        reg = <0>;
>> +                        mdss_dp0_in: endpoint {
>> +                            remote-endpoint = <&dpu_intf0_out>;
>> +                        };
>> +                    };
>> +                };
>> +
>> +                dp_opp_table: opp-table {
>> +                    compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> +
>> +                    opp-160000000 {
>> +                        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <160000000>;
>> +                        required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>> +                    };
>> +
>> +                    opp-270000000 {
>> +                        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <270000000>;
>> +                        required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
>> +                    };
>> +
>> +                    opp-540000000 {
>> +                        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <540000000>;
>> +                        required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
>> +                    };
>> +
>> +                    opp-810000000 {
>> +                        opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <810000000>;
>> +                        required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>> +                    };
>> +                };
>> +            };
>> +
>>               mdss_dsi0: dsi@ae94000 {
>>                   compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl", "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl";
>>                   reg = <0 0x0ae94000 0 0x400>;
>>
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 2 years, 7 months ago
On 10/02/2023 17:28, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi 
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
>>>                           };
>>>                       };
>>> +                    port@2 {
>>> +                        reg = <2>;
>>> +                        dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
>>> +                            remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
>>> +                        };
>>> +                    };
>>> +
>>>                   };
>>>                   mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
>>> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
>>>                   };
>>>               };
>>> +            mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
>>> +                compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";
> 
> Exact, must fix.
> 
>>
>> Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd 
>> suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 
>> and 8450 entries.
>>
>>> +                reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
>>> +                      <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
>>> +                      <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
>>> +                      <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
>>> +                      <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;
>>
>>
>> While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 
>> 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp 
>> uses even sizes).
> 
> I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system 
> freezes when using even sizes, using
> the exact register size works fine.

Interesting. Could you please trace, what exactly makes it fail, since 
specifying bigger region size should not cause such issues.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller
Posted by neil.armstrong@linaro.org 2 years, 7 months ago
On 10/02/2023 16:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 10/02/2023 17:28, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
>>>>                           };
>>>>                       };
>>>> +                    port@2 {
>>>> +                        reg = <2>;
>>>> +                        dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
>>>> +                            remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
>>>> +                        };
>>>> +                    };
>>>> +
>>>>                   };
>>>>                   mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
>>>> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
>>>>                   };
>>>>               };
>>>> +            mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
>>>> +                compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";
>>
>> Exact, must fix.
>>
>>>
>>> Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries.
>>>
>>>> +                reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
>>>> +                      <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
>>>> +                      <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
>>>> +                      <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
>>>> +                      <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;
>>>
>>>
>>> While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes).
>>
>> I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system freezes when using even sizes, using
>> the exact register size works fine.
> 
> Interesting. Could you please trace, what exactly makes it fail, since specifying bigger region size should not cause such issues.

Yep I'll trace what's happening.

Neil

> 

Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add dp controller
Posted by Neil Armstrong 2 years, 7 months ago
On 13/02/2023 13:32, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote:
> On 10/02/2023 16:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 10/02/2023 17:28, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2023 16:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On 10/02/2023 16:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Add the Display Port controller subnode to the MDSS node.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> index 6caa2c8efb46..72d54beb7d7c 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -2751,6 +2751,13 @@ dpu_intf2_out: endpoint {
>>>>>                           };
>>>>>                       };
>>>>> +                    port@2 {
>>>>> +                        reg = <2>;
>>>>> +                        dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
>>>>> +                            remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
>>>>> +                        };
>>>>> +                    };
>>>>> +
>>>>>                   };
>>>>>                   mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
>>>>> @@ -2783,6 +2790,78 @@ opp-500000000 {
>>>>>                   };
>>>>>               };
>>>>> +            mdss_dp0: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
>>>>> +                compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dp";
>>>
>>> Exact, must fix.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Missing "qcom,sm8450-dp". As I wrote in the comment to patch 1, I'd suggest having just a single entry here rather than keeping both 8350 and 8450 entries.
>>>>
>>>>> +                reg = <0 0xae90000 0 0xfc>,
>>>>> +                      <0 0xae90200 0 0xc0>,
>>>>> +                      <0 0xae90400 0 0x770>,
>>>>> +                      <0 0xae91000 0 0x98>,
>>>>> +                      <0 0xae91400 0 0x98>;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> While this sounds correct, usually we used the even size here (0x200, 0x400, etc.). Can we please switch to it (especially since sm8350-dp uses even sizes).
>>>
>>> I don't have access to registers layout for HDK8450 but the system freezes when using even sizes, using
>>> the exact register size works fine.
>>
>> Interesting. Could you please trace, what exactly makes it fail, since specifying bigger region size should not cause such issues.
> 
> Yep I'll trace what's happening.

OK weird, I tried with the same sizes as sm8350, and it works fine.

Will resend with this fixed.

Neil

> 
> Neil
> 
>>
>