Hi,

If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof Kozlowski (13):
  dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: use fallbacks
  dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: document missing sdx55
  mailbox: qcom-apcs-ipc: do not grow the of_device_id
  arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8976: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: add compatible fallback to mailbox

 .../mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml        | 67 +++++++++++--------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8976.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi          |  3 +-
 drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c       | 11 +--
 12 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

On 02/02/2023 17:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
> patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
> 

This patchset will conflict with:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126230319.3977109-2-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/

In few places it actually re-does Dmitry's patch, so probably we should
both come with unified solution.

Best regards,
Krzysztof