block/bfq-cgroup.c | 4 +--- block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 -- block/blk-cgroup.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
After commit dfd6200a0954 ("blk-cgroup: support to track if policy is
online"), there is no need to do this again in bfq.
However, 'pd->online' is not protected by 'bfqd->lock', in order to make
sure bfq won't see that 'pd->online' is still set after bfq_pd_offline(),
clear it before bfq_pd_offline() is called. This is fine because other
polices doesn't use 'pd->online' and bfq_pd_offline() will move active
bfqq to root cgroup anyway.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- in commit message: protected -> not protected, bfq_pd_offline_() ->
bfq_pd_offline().
Changes in v2:
- clear 'pd->online' before calling bfq_pd_offline()
block/bfq-cgroup.c | 4 +---
block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 --
block/blk-cgroup.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
index b42956ab5550..a35136dae713 100644
--- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
@@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ static void bfq_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
bfqg->bfqd = bfqd;
bfqg->active_entities = 0;
bfqg->num_queues_with_pending_reqs = 0;
- bfqg->online = true;
bfqg->rq_pos_tree = RB_ROOT;
}
@@ -614,7 +613,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bio_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio)
continue;
}
bfqg = blkg_to_bfqg(blkg);
- if (bfqg->online) {
+ if (bfqg->pd.online) {
bio_associate_blkg_from_css(bio, &blkg->blkcg->css);
return bfqg;
}
@@ -985,7 +984,6 @@ static void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
put_async_queues:
bfq_put_async_queues(bfqd, bfqg);
- bfqg->online = false;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags);
/*
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index 75cc6a324267..69aaee52285a 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -1009,8 +1009,6 @@ struct bfq_group {
/* reference counter (see comments in bfq_bic_update_cgroup) */
refcount_t ref;
- /* Is bfq_group still online? */
- bool online;
struct bfq_entity entity;
struct bfq_sched_data sched_data;
diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index cb110fc51940..a228dfe65253 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -491,9 +491,9 @@ static void blkg_destroy(struct blkcg_gq *blkg)
struct blkcg_policy *pol = blkcg_policy[i];
if (blkg->pd[i] && blkg->pd[i]->online) {
+ blkg->pd[i]->online = false;
if (pol->pd_offline_fn)
pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
- blkg->pd[i]->online = false;
}
}
--
2.31.1
On Thu, 02 Feb 2023 21:49:13 +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > After commit dfd6200a0954 ("blk-cgroup: support to track if policy is > online"), there is no need to do this again in bfq. > > However, 'pd->online' is not protected by 'bfqd->lock', in order to make > sure bfq won't see that 'pd->online' is still set after bfq_pd_offline(), > clear it before bfq_pd_offline() is called. This is fine because other > polices doesn't use 'pd->online' and bfq_pd_offline() will move active > bfqq to root cgroup anyway. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] block, bfq: cleanup 'bfqg->online' commit: f37bf75ca73d523ebaa7ceb44c45d8ecd05374fe Best regards, -- Jens Axboe
On Thu 02-02-23 21:49:13, Yu Kuai wrote: > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > After commit dfd6200a0954 ("blk-cgroup: support to track if policy is > online"), there is no need to do this again in bfq. > > However, 'pd->online' is not protected by 'bfqd->lock', in order to make > sure bfq won't see that 'pd->online' is still set after bfq_pd_offline(), > clear it before bfq_pd_offline() is called. This is fine because other > polices doesn't use 'pd->online' and bfq_pd_offline() will move active > bfqq to root cgroup anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> The patch looks good to me now. Thanks! Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > Changes in v3: > - in commit message: protected -> not protected, bfq_pd_offline_() -> > bfq_pd_offline(). > Changes in v2: > - clear 'pd->online' before calling bfq_pd_offline() > > block/bfq-cgroup.c | 4 +--- > block/bfq-iosched.h | 2 -- > block/blk-cgroup.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c > index b42956ab5550..a35136dae713 100644 > --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c > +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c > @@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ static void bfq_pd_init(struct blkg_policy_data *pd) > bfqg->bfqd = bfqd; > bfqg->active_entities = 0; > bfqg->num_queues_with_pending_reqs = 0; > - bfqg->online = true; > bfqg->rq_pos_tree = RB_ROOT; > } > > @@ -614,7 +613,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bio_bfqg(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bio *bio) > continue; > } > bfqg = blkg_to_bfqg(blkg); > - if (bfqg->online) { > + if (bfqg->pd.online) { > bio_associate_blkg_from_css(bio, &blkg->blkcg->css); > return bfqg; > } > @@ -985,7 +984,6 @@ static void bfq_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd) > > put_async_queues: > bfq_put_async_queues(bfqd, bfqg); > - bfqg->online = false; > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags); > /* > diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h > index 75cc6a324267..69aaee52285a 100644 > --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h > +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h > @@ -1009,8 +1009,6 @@ struct bfq_group { > > /* reference counter (see comments in bfq_bic_update_cgroup) */ > refcount_t ref; > - /* Is bfq_group still online? */ > - bool online; > > struct bfq_entity entity; > struct bfq_sched_data sched_data; > diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c > index cb110fc51940..a228dfe65253 100644 > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c > @@ -491,9 +491,9 @@ static void blkg_destroy(struct blkcg_gq *blkg) > struct blkcg_policy *pol = blkcg_policy[i]; > > if (blkg->pd[i] && blkg->pd[i]->online) { > + blkg->pd[i]->online = false; > if (pol->pd_offline_fn) > pol->pd_offline_fn(blkg->pd[i]); > - blkg->pd[i]->online = false; > } > } > > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.