This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
fully in the future.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
@@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
/* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
bool pause;
+
+ /* Performance monitoring context */
+ struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
};
static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e2b4038
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
+#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
+
+#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
+#include <asm/sbi.h>
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
+#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
+
+#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
+#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
+#endif
+
+#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
+
+/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
+struct kvm_pmc {
+ u8 idx;
+ struct perf_event *perf_event;
+ uint64_t counter_val;
+ union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
+ /* Event monitoring status */
+ bool started;
+};
+
+/* PMU data structure per vcpu */
+struct kvm_pmu {
+ struct kvm_pmc pmc[RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS];
+ /* Number of the virtual firmware counters available */
+ int num_fw_ctrs;
+ /* Number of the virtual hardware counters available */
+ int num_hw_ctrs;
+ /* A flag to indicate that pmu initialization is done */
+ bool init_done;
+ /* Bit map of all the virtual counter used */
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(pmc_in_use, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
+};
+
+#define vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu) (&(vcpu)->arch.pmu_context)
+#define pmu_to_vcpu(pmu) (container_of((pmu), struct kvm_vcpu, arch.pmu_context))
+
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
+ unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
+ unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
+ unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
+ unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+#else
+struct kvm_pmu {
+};
+
+static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
+static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
+static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI */
+#endif /* !__KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
index 019df920..5de1053 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
@@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_base.o
kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_replace.o
kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_hsm.o
kvm-y += vcpu_timer.o
+kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
index 7c08567..7d010b0 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
@@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending, 0);
WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending_mask, 0);
+ kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(vcpu);
+
vcpu->arch.hfence_head = 0;
vcpu->arch.hfence_tail = 0;
memset(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue));
@@ -194,6 +196,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Setup VCPU timer */
kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init(vcpu);
+ /* setup performance monitoring */
+ kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(vcpu);
+
/* Reset VCPU */
kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
@@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Cleanup VCPU timer */
kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_deinit(vcpu);
+ kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
+
/* Free unused pages pre-allocated for G-stage page table mappings */
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2dad37f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
+#include <asm/csr.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+
+#define kvm_pmu_num_counters(pmu) ((pmu)->num_hw_ctrs + (pmu)->num_fw_ctrs)
+
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+
+ retdata->out_val = kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
+{
+ struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+
+ if (cidx > RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS || cidx == 1) {
+ retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ retdata->out_val = kvpmu->pmc[cidx].cinfo.value;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
+ unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
+{
+ /* TODO */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
+ unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
+{
+ /* TODO */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
+ unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
+ unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
+{
+ /* TODO */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
+ struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
+{
+ /* TODO */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i = 0, ret, num_hw_ctrs = 0, hpm_width = 0;
+ struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
+
+ ret = riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(&hpm_width, &num_hw_ctrs);
+ if (ret < 0 || !hpm_width || !num_hw_ctrs)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * It is guranteed that RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS can't exceed 32 as
+ * that may exceed total number of counters more than RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
+ */
+ kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs = num_hw_ctrs;
+ kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs = RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS;
+
+ /*
+ * There is no correlation between the logical hardware counter and virtual counters.
+ * However, we need to encode a hpmcounter CSR in the counter info field so that
+ * KVM can trap n emulate the read. This works well in the migration use case as
+ * KVM doesn't care if the actual hpmcounter is available in the hardware or not.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu); i++) {
+ /* TIME CSR shouldn't be read from perf interface */
+ if (i == 1)
+ continue;
+ pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[i];
+ pmc->idx = i;
+ if (i < kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs) {
+ pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW;
+ if (i < 3)
+ /* CY, IR counters */
+ pmc->cinfo.width = 63;
+ else
+ pmc->cinfo.width = hpm_width;
+ /*
+ * The CSR number doesn't have any relation with the logical
+ * hardware counters. The CSR numbers are encoded sequentially
+ * to avoid maintaining a map between the virtual counter
+ * and CSR number.
+ */
+ pmc->cinfo.csr = CSR_CYCLE + i;
+ } else {
+ pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW;
+ pmc->cinfo.width = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ kvpmu->init_done = true;
+}
+
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ /* TODO */
+}
+
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
+}
--
2.25.1On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> fully in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
>
> #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
>
> @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>
> /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> bool pause;
> +
> + /* Performance monitoring context */
> + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> };
>
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e2b4038
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> +
> +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> +
> +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
"The number of firmware counters cannot exceed 32 without increasing RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> +#endif
> +
> +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
But instead of that message, what I think we need is something like
#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
And then in pmu_sbi_device_probe() should ensure
num_counters <= RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
and pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo() should ensure
num_hw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
num_fw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS
which has to be done at runtime.
> +
> +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
> +struct kvm_pmc {
> + u8 idx;
> + struct perf_event *perf_event;
> + uint64_t counter_val;
> + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
> + /* Event monitoring status */
> + bool started;
> +};
> +
> +/* PMU data structure per vcpu */
> +struct kvm_pmu {
> + struct kvm_pmc pmc[RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS];
> + /* Number of the virtual firmware counters available */
> + int num_fw_ctrs;
> + /* Number of the virtual hardware counters available */
> + int num_hw_ctrs;
> + /* A flag to indicate that pmu initialization is done */
> + bool init_done;
> + /* Bit map of all the virtual counter used */
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(pmc_in_use, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> +};
> +
> +#define vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu) (&(vcpu)->arch.pmu_context)
> +#define pmu_to_vcpu(pmu) (container_of((pmu), struct kvm_vcpu, arch.pmu_context))
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
s/flag/flags/ for all the above prototypes and all the implementations
below.
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
> +#else
> +struct kvm_pmu {
> +};
> +
> +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI */
> +#endif /* !__KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> index 019df920..5de1053 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_base.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_replace.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_hsm.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_timer.o
> +kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> index 7c08567..7d010b0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending, 0);
> WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending_mask, 0);
>
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(vcpu);
> +
> vcpu->arch.hfence_head = 0;
> vcpu->arch.hfence_tail = 0;
> memset(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue));
> @@ -194,6 +196,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Setup VCPU timer */
> kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init(vcpu);
>
> + /* setup performance monitoring */
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(vcpu);
> +
> /* Reset VCPU */
> kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
>
> @@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Cleanup VCPU timer */
> kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_deinit(vcpu);
>
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> +
> /* Free unused pages pre-allocated for G-stage page table mappings */
> kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2dad37f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +
> +#define kvm_pmu_num_counters(pmu) ((pmu)->num_hw_ctrs + (pmu)->num_fw_ctrs)
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> + retdata->out_val = kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> + if (cidx > RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS || cidx == 1) {
> + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + retdata->out_val = kvpmu->pmc[cidx].cinfo.value;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int i = 0, ret, num_hw_ctrs = 0, hpm_width = 0;
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> + ret = riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(&hpm_width, &num_hw_ctrs);
> + if (ret < 0 || !hpm_width || !num_hw_ctrs)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * It is guranteed that RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS can't exceed 32 as
> + * that may exceed total number of counters more than RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> + */
> + kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs = num_hw_ctrs;
> + kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs = RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS;
If we sanity check that num_hw_ctrs <= 32 and num_fw_ctrs <= 32 at sbi_pmu
probe time, then we can also return num_fw_ctrs (or num_ctrs) along with
num_hw_ctrs from riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(). Then, we can put the exact
number here into kvmpmu->num_fw_ctrs, rather than using its max.
> +
> + /*
> + * There is no correlation between the logical hardware counter and virtual counters.
> + * However, we need to encode a hpmcounter CSR in the counter info field so that
> + * KVM can trap n emulate the read. This works well in the migration use case as
> + * KVM doesn't care if the actual hpmcounter is available in the hardware or not.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu); i++) {
> + /* TIME CSR shouldn't be read from perf interface */
> + if (i == 1)
> + continue;
> + pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[i];
> + pmc->idx = i;
> + if (i < kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs) {
> + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW;
> + if (i < 3)
> + /* CY, IR counters */
> + pmc->cinfo.width = 63;
> + else
> + pmc->cinfo.width = hpm_width;
> + /*
> + * The CSR number doesn't have any relation with the logical
> + * hardware counters. The CSR numbers are encoded sequentially
> + * to avoid maintaining a map between the virtual counter
> + * and CSR number.
> + */
> + pmc->cinfo.csr = CSR_CYCLE + i;
> + } else {
> + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW;
> + pmc->cinfo.width = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + kvpmu->init_done = true;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> +}
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Thanks,
drew
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:03 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> > fully in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> >
> > #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> >
> > @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> >
> > /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> > bool pause;
> > +
> > + /* Performance monitoring context */
> > + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> > };
> >
> > static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..e2b4038
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> > +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > +
> > +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> > +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
>
> "The number of firmware counters cannot exceed 32 without increasing RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
>
> But instead of that message, what I think we need is something like
>
> #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
> #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
>
> static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
>
> And then in pmu_sbi_device_probe() should ensure
>
> num_counters <= RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
>
> and pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo() should ensure
>
> num_hw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
> num_fw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS
>
> which has to be done at runtime.
>
Sure. I will add the additional sanity checks.
> > +
> > +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
> > +struct kvm_pmc {
> > + u8 idx;
> > + struct perf_event *perf_event;
> > + uint64_t counter_val;
> > + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
> > + /* Event monitoring status */
> > + bool started;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* PMU data structure per vcpu */
> > +struct kvm_pmu {
> > + struct kvm_pmc pmc[RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS];
> > + /* Number of the virtual firmware counters available */
> > + int num_fw_ctrs;
> > + /* Number of the virtual hardware counters available */
> > + int num_hw_ctrs;
> > + /* A flag to indicate that pmu initialization is done */
> > + bool init_done;
> > + /* Bit map of all the virtual counter used */
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(pmc_in_use, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu) (&(vcpu)->arch.pmu_context)
> > +#define pmu_to_vcpu(pmu) (container_of((pmu), struct kvm_vcpu, arch.pmu_context))
> > +
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
>
> s/flag/flags/ for all the above prototypes and all the implementations
> below.
>
Fixed.
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +
> > +#else
> > +struct kvm_pmu {
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI */
> > +#endif /* !__KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > index 019df920..5de1053 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_base.o
> > kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_replace.o
> > kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_hsm.o
> > kvm-y += vcpu_timer.o
> > +kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > index 7c08567..7d010b0 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending, 0);
> > WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending_mask, 0);
> >
> > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(vcpu);
> > +
> > vcpu->arch.hfence_head = 0;
> > vcpu->arch.hfence_tail = 0;
> > memset(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue));
> > @@ -194,6 +196,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > /* Setup VCPU timer */
> > kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init(vcpu);
> >
> > + /* setup performance monitoring */
> > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(vcpu);
> > +
> > /* Reset VCPU */
> > kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
> >
> > @@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > /* Cleanup VCPU timer */
> > kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_deinit(vcpu);
> >
> > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> > +
> > /* Free unused pages pre-allocated for G-stage page table mappings */
> > kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..2dad37f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > +#include <asm/csr.h>
> > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > +
> > +#define kvm_pmu_num_counters(pmu) ((pmu)->num_hw_ctrs + (pmu)->num_fw_ctrs)
> > +
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > +
> > + retdata->out_val = kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > +
> > + if (cidx > RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS || cidx == 1) {
> > + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + retdata->out_val = kvpmu->pmc[cidx].cinfo.value;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > +{
> > + /* TODO */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > +{
> > + /* TODO */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > +{
> > + /* TODO */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > +{
> > + /* TODO */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + int i = 0, ret, num_hw_ctrs = 0, hpm_width = 0;
> > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> > +
> > + ret = riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(&hpm_width, &num_hw_ctrs);
> > + if (ret < 0 || !hpm_width || !num_hw_ctrs)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * It is guranteed that RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS can't exceed 32 as
> > + * that may exceed total number of counters more than RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> > + */
> > + kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs = num_hw_ctrs;
> > + kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs = RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS;
>
> If we sanity check that num_hw_ctrs <= 32 and num_fw_ctrs <= 32 at sbi_pmu
> probe time, then we can also return num_fw_ctrs (or num_ctrs) along with
> num_hw_ctrs from riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(). Then, we can put the exact
> number here into kvmpmu->num_fw_ctrs, rather than using its max.
>
The firmware counter information retrieved from PMU driver will be the
number of firmware
counter host supports (i.e. M-mode firmware supports). The number of
counters supported for a
guest is entirely up to the hypervisor. There shouldn't be any
relation with the host's firmware counter.
Looking at it again, we should probably set kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs to
SBI_PMU_FW_MAX instead of RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS.
We already have a sanity check for SBI_PMU_FW_MAX in the code.
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * There is no correlation between the logical hardware counter and virtual counters.
> > + * However, we need to encode a hpmcounter CSR in the counter info field so that
> > + * KVM can trap n emulate the read. This works well in the migration use case as
> > + * KVM doesn't care if the actual hpmcounter is available in the hardware or not.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu); i++) {
> > + /* TIME CSR shouldn't be read from perf interface */
> > + if (i == 1)
> > + continue;
> > + pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[i];
> > + pmc->idx = i;
> > + if (i < kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs) {
> > + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW;
> > + if (i < 3)
> > + /* CY, IR counters */
> > + pmc->cinfo.width = 63;
> > + else
> > + pmc->cinfo.width = hpm_width;
> > + /*
> > + * The CSR number doesn't have any relation with the logical
> > + * hardware counters. The CSR numbers are encoded sequentially
> > + * to avoid maintaining a map between the virtual counter
> > + * and CSR number.
> > + */
> > + pmc->cinfo.csr = CSR_CYCLE + i;
> > + } else {
> > + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW;
> > + pmc->cinfo.width = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + kvpmu->init_done = true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + /* TODO */
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> Thanks,
> drew
--
Regards,
Atish
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:47 AM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:03 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> > > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> > > fully in the future.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > >
> > > #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> > >
> > > @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > >
> > > /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> > > bool pause;
> > > +
> > > + /* Performance monitoring context */
> > > + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..e2b4038
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > > + *
> > > + * Authors:
> > > + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> > > +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > +
> > > +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> > > +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> >
> > "The number of firmware counters cannot exceed 32 without increasing RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> >
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
> >
> > But instead of that message, what I think we need is something like
> >
> > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
> > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
> >
> > static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
> >
> > And then in pmu_sbi_device_probe() should ensure
> >
> > num_counters <= RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> >
> > and pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo() should ensure
> >
> > num_hw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
> > num_fw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS
> >
> > which has to be done at runtime.
> >
>
> Sure. I will add the additional sanity checks.
>
As explained above, I feel we shouldn't mix the firmware number of
counters that the host gets and it exposes to a guest.
So I have not included this suggestion in the v5.
I have changed the num_fw_ctrs to PMU_FW_MAX though to accurately
reflect the firmware counters KVM is actually using.
I don't know if there is any benefit of static_assert over #error.
Please let me know if you feel strongly about that.
> > > +
> > > +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
> > > +struct kvm_pmc {
> > > + u8 idx;
> > > + struct perf_event *perf_event;
> > > + uint64_t counter_val;
> > > + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
> > > + /* Event monitoring status */
> > > + bool started;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/* PMU data structure per vcpu */
> > > +struct kvm_pmu {
> > > + struct kvm_pmc pmc[RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS];
> > > + /* Number of the virtual firmware counters available */
> > > + int num_fw_ctrs;
> > > + /* Number of the virtual hardware counters available */
> > > + int num_hw_ctrs;
> > > + /* A flag to indicate that pmu initialization is done */
> > > + bool init_done;
> > > + /* Bit map of all the virtual counter used */
> > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(pmc_in_use, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu) (&(vcpu)->arch.pmu_context)
> > > +#define pmu_to_vcpu(pmu) (container_of((pmu), struct kvm_vcpu, arch.pmu_context))
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> >
> > s/flag/flags/ for all the above prototypes and all the implementations
> > below.
> >
>
> Fixed.
>
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > +
> > > +#else
> > > +struct kvm_pmu {
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > > +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI */
> > > +#endif /* !__KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H */
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > > index 019df920..5de1053 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> > > @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_base.o
> > > kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_replace.o
> > > kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_hsm.o
> > > kvm-y += vcpu_timer.o
> > > +kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > > index 7c08567..7d010b0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> > > @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending, 0);
> > > WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending_mask, 0);
> > >
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > vcpu->arch.hfence_head = 0;
> > > vcpu->arch.hfence_tail = 0;
> > > memset(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue));
> > > @@ -194,6 +196,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > /* Setup VCPU timer */
> > > kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init(vcpu);
> > >
> > > + /* setup performance monitoring */
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > /* Reset VCPU */
> > > kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
> > >
> > > @@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > /* Cleanup VCPU timer */
> > > kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_deinit(vcpu);
> > >
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > /* Free unused pages pre-allocated for G-stage page table mappings */
> > > kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..2dad37f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > > + *
> > > + * Authors:
> > > + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > > +#include <asm/csr.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> > > +
> > > +#define kvm_pmu_num_counters(pmu) ((pmu)->num_hw_ctrs + (pmu)->num_fw_ctrs)
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > + retdata->out_val = kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > > +
> > > + if (cidx > RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS || cidx == 1) {
> > > + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + retdata->out_val = kvpmu->pmc[cidx].cinfo.value;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> > > + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> > > + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> > > + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + int i = 0, ret, num_hw_ctrs = 0, hpm_width = 0;
> > > + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> > > + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> > > +
> > > + ret = riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(&hpm_width, &num_hw_ctrs);
> > > + if (ret < 0 || !hpm_width || !num_hw_ctrs)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * It is guranteed that RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS can't exceed 32 as
> > > + * that may exceed total number of counters more than RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> > > + */
> > > + kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs = num_hw_ctrs;
> > > + kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs = RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS;
> >
> > If we sanity check that num_hw_ctrs <= 32 and num_fw_ctrs <= 32 at sbi_pmu
> > probe time, then we can also return num_fw_ctrs (or num_ctrs) along with
> > num_hw_ctrs from riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(). Then, we can put the exact
> > number here into kvmpmu->num_fw_ctrs, rather than using its max.
> >
>
> The firmware counter information retrieved from PMU driver will be the
> number of firmware
> counter host supports (i.e. M-mode firmware supports). The number of
> counters supported for a
> guest is entirely up to the hypervisor. There shouldn't be any
> relation with the host's firmware counter.
>
> Looking at it again, we should probably set kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs to
> SBI_PMU_FW_MAX instead of RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS.
> We already have a sanity check for SBI_PMU_FW_MAX in the code.
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * There is no correlation between the logical hardware counter and virtual counters.
> > > + * However, we need to encode a hpmcounter CSR in the counter info field so that
> > > + * KVM can trap n emulate the read. This works well in the migration use case as
> > > + * KVM doesn't care if the actual hpmcounter is available in the hardware or not.
> > > + */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu); i++) {
> > > + /* TIME CSR shouldn't be read from perf interface */
> > > + if (i == 1)
> > > + continue;
> > > + pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[i];
> > > + pmc->idx = i;
> > > + if (i < kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs) {
> > > + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW;
> > > + if (i < 3)
> > > + /* CY, IR counters */
> > > + pmc->cinfo.width = 63;
> > > + else
> > > + pmc->cinfo.width = hpm_width;
> > > + /*
> > > + * The CSR number doesn't have any relation with the logical
> > > + * hardware counters. The CSR numbers are encoded sequentially
> > > + * to avoid maintaining a map between the virtual counter
> > > + * and CSR number.
> > > + */
> > > + pmc->cinfo.csr = CSR_CYCLE + i;
> > > + } else {
> > > + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW;
> > > + pmc->cinfo.width = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + kvpmu->init_done = true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > +{
> > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> > > +}
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Atish
--
Regards,
Atish
On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 11:37:47PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:47 AM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:03 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> > > > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> > > > fully in the future.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> > > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> > > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > > >
> > > > #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> > > >
> > > > @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > > >
> > > > /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> > > > bool pause;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Performance monitoring context */
> > > > + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..e2b4038
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Authors:
> > > > + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > > +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > > +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> > > > +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > > +
> > > > +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> > > > +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> > >
> > > "The number of firmware counters cannot exceed 32 without increasing RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> > >
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > > +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
> > >
> > > But instead of that message, what I think we need is something like
> > >
> > > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
> > > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
> > >
> > > static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
> > >
> > > And then in pmu_sbi_device_probe() should ensure
> > >
> > > num_counters <= RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> > >
> > > and pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo() should ensure
> > >
> > > num_hw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
> > > num_fw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS
> > >
> > > which has to be done at runtime.
> > >
> >
> > Sure. I will add the additional sanity checks.
> >
>
> As explained above, I feel we shouldn't mix the firmware number of
> counters that the host gets and it exposes to a guest.
> So I have not included this suggestion in the v5.
> I have changed the num_fw_ctrs to PMU_FW_MAX though to accurately
> reflect the firmware counters KVM is actually using.
Sounds good
> I don't know if there is any benefit of static_assert over #error.
> Please let me know if you feel strongly about that.
One "normal" line vs. three #-lines?
Thanks,
drew
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:22:04AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 11:37:47PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:47 AM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:03 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > > > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> > > > > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> > > > > fully in the future.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> > > > > arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> > > > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> > > > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> > > > > bool pause;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Performance monitoring context */
> > > > > + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 0000000..e2b4038
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Authors:
> > > > > + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > > > +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > > > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > > > +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> > > > > +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> > > > > +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> > > >
> > > > "The number of firmware counters cannot exceed 32 without increasing RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> > > >
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
> > > >
> > > > But instead of that message, what I think we need is something like
> > > >
> > > > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
> > > > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > > #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
> > > >
> > > > static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
> > > >
> > > > And then in pmu_sbi_device_probe() should ensure
> > > >
> > > > num_counters <= RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> > > >
> > > > and pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo() should ensure
> > > >
> > > > num_hw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
> > > > num_fw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS
> > > >
> > > > which has to be done at runtime.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Sure. I will add the additional sanity checks.
> > >
> >
> > As explained above, I feel we shouldn't mix the firmware number of
> > counters that the host gets and it exposes to a guest.
> > So I have not included this suggestion in the v5.
> > I have changed the num_fw_ctrs to PMU_FW_MAX though to accurately
> > reflect the firmware counters KVM is actually using.
>
> Sounds good
I just looked at v5. IMO, much of what I proposed above still makes
sense, since what I'm proposing is that the relationship between
RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS, RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS, and 64
(our current max bitmap size) be explicitly checked. So, even if we want
RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS to be SBI_PMU_FW_MAX, it'd be good to have
#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
(And a runtime check confirming num_hw_ctrs + 1 <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS,
and then either silently capping or issuing a warning and capping)
And, to be sure the sum of RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS and RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
doesn't exceed the size of the bitmap
#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS SBI_PMU_FW_MAX
#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
Thanks,
drew
>
> > I don't know if there is any benefit of static_assert over #error.
> > Please let me know if you feel strongly about that.
>
> One "normal" line vs. three #-lines?
>
> Thanks,
> drew
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 3:39 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:22:04AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 04, 2023 at 11:37:47PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:47 AM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:03 AM Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > > > > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> > > > > > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> > > > > > fully in the future.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> > > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> > > > > > arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> > > > > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> > > > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > > index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> > > > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > > > > #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> > > > > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> > > > > > bool pause;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* Performance monitoring context */
> > > > > > + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> > > > > > };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 0000000..e2b4038
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> > > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Authors:
> > > > > > + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > > > > +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> > > > > > +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> > > > > > +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> > > > > > +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> > > > > > +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> > > > >
> > > > > "The number of firmware counters cannot exceed 32 without increasing RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> > > > >
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
> > > > >
> > > > > But instead of that message, what I think we need is something like
> > > > >
> > > > > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
> > > > > #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> > > > > #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
> > > > >
> > > > > static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
> > > > >
> > > > > And then in pmu_sbi_device_probe() should ensure
> > > > >
> > > > > num_counters <= RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> > > > >
> > > > > and pmu_sbi_get_ctrinfo() should ensure
> > > > >
> > > > > num_hw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
> > > > > num_fw_ctr <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS
> > > > >
> > > > > which has to be done at runtime.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sure. I will add the additional sanity checks.
> > > >
> > >
> > > As explained above, I feel we shouldn't mix the firmware number of
> > > counters that the host gets and it exposes to a guest.
> > > So I have not included this suggestion in the v5.
> > > I have changed the num_fw_ctrs to PMU_FW_MAX though to accurately
> > > reflect the firmware counters KVM is actually using.
> >
> > Sounds good
>
> I just looked at v5. IMO, much of what I proposed above still makes
> sense, since what I'm proposing is that the relationship between
> RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS, RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS, and 64
> (our current max bitmap size) be explicitly checked. So, even if we want
> RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS to be SBI_PMU_FW_MAX, it'd be good to have
>
> #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS 32
>
> (And a runtime check confirming num_hw_ctrs + 1 <= RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS,
> and then either silently capping or issuing a warning and capping)
>
> And, to be sure the sum of RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS and RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS
> doesn't exceed the size of the bitmap
>
> #define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS SBI_PMU_FW_MAX
> #define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS (RISCV_KVM_MAX_HW_CTRS + RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS)
> static_assert(RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS <= 64)
>
ok. I have added those changes but I have modified RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
to RISCV_KVM_MAX_COUNTERS,
to avoid overlapping with the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS defined in the host.
Logically, the host and the guest can have separate counters anyways.
> Thanks,
> drew
>
> >
> > > I don't know if there is any benefit of static_assert over #error.
> > > Please let me know if you feel strongly about that.
> >
> > One "normal" line vs. three #-lines?
> >
Fair enough. Fixed.
> > Thanks,
> > drew
--
Regards,
Atish
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> fully in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
> +struct kvm_pmc {
> + u8 idx;
> + struct perf_event *perf_event;
> + uint64_t counter_val;
CI also complained that here, and elsewhere, you used uint64_t rather
than u64. Am I missing a reason for not using the regular types?
Thanks,
Conor.
> + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
> + /* Event monitoring status */
> + bool started;
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:34 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> > fully in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
> > +struct kvm_pmc {
> > + u8 idx;
> > + struct perf_event *perf_event;
> > + uint64_t counter_val;
>
> CI also complained that here, and elsewhere, you used uint64_t rather
> than u64. Am I missing a reason for not using the regular types?
>
Nope. It was a simple oversight. I will fix it.
Do you have a link to the CI report so that I can address them all in v5 ?
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
> > + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
> > + /* Event monitoring status */
> > + bool started;
--
Regards,
Atish
On 3 February 2023 08:04:00 GMT, Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:34 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:12:43PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
>> > This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
>> > the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
>> > fully in the future.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
>> > +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
>> > +struct kvm_pmc {
>> > + u8 idx;
>> > + struct perf_event *perf_event;
>> > + uint64_t counter_val;
>>
>> CI also complained that here, and elsewhere, you used uint64_t rather
>> than u64. Am I missing a reason for not using the regular types?
>>
>
>Nope. It was a simple oversight. I will fix it.
>Do you have a link to the CI report so that I can address them all in v5 ?
Try:
:%s/uint64_t/u64
It was just this patch, and checkpatch --strict should show it.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Conor.
>>
>> > + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
>> > + /* Event monitoring status */
>> > + bool started;
>
>
>
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 4:42 AM Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> This patch only adds barebone structure of perf implementation. Most of
> the function returns zero at this point and will be implemented
> fully in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Regards,
Anup
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h | 78 +++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 7 ++
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 93f43a3..b90be9a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_insn.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_vcpu_timer.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
>
> #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
>
> @@ -228,6 +229,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>
> /* Don't run the VCPU (blocked) */
> bool pause;
> +
> + /* Performance monitoring context */
> + struct kvm_pmu pmu_context;
> };
>
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e2b4038
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> +#define __KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H
> +
> +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> +#include <asm/sbi.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI
> +#define RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS 32
> +
> +#if RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS > 32
> +#error "Maximum firmware counter can't exceed 32 without increasing the RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS"
> +#endif
> +
> +#define RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS 64
> +
> +/* Per virtual pmu counter data */
> +struct kvm_pmc {
> + u8 idx;
> + struct perf_event *perf_event;
> + uint64_t counter_val;
> + union sbi_pmu_ctr_info cinfo;
> + /* Event monitoring status */
> + bool started;
> +};
> +
> +/* PMU data structure per vcpu */
> +struct kvm_pmu {
> + struct kvm_pmc pmc[RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS];
> + /* Number of the virtual firmware counters available */
> + int num_fw_ctrs;
> + /* Number of the virtual hardware counters available */
> + int num_hw_ctrs;
> + /* A flag to indicate that pmu initialization is done */
> + bool init_done;
> + /* Bit map of all the virtual counter used */
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(pmc_in_use, RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS);
> +};
> +
> +#define vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu) (&(vcpu)->arch.pmu_context)
> +#define pmu_to_vcpu(pmu) (container_of((pmu), struct kvm_vcpu, arch.pmu_context))
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata);
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
> +#else
> +struct kvm_pmu {
> +};
> +
> +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI */
> +#endif /* !__KVM_VCPU_RISCV_PMU_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> index 019df920..5de1053 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -25,3 +25,4 @@ kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_base.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_replace.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_sbi_hsm.o
> kvm-y += vcpu_timer.o
> +kvm-$(CONFIG_RISCV_PMU_SBI) += vcpu_pmu.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> index 7c08567..7d010b0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static void kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending, 0);
> WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.irqs_pending_mask, 0);
>
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(vcpu);
> +
> vcpu->arch.hfence_head = 0;
> vcpu->arch.hfence_tail = 0;
> memset(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.hfence_queue));
> @@ -194,6 +196,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Setup VCPU timer */
> kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_init(vcpu);
>
> + /* setup performance monitoring */
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(vcpu);
> +
> /* Reset VCPU */
> kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
>
> @@ -216,6 +221,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Cleanup VCPU timer */
> kvm_riscv_vcpu_timer_deinit(vcpu);
>
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> +
> /* Free unused pages pre-allocated for G-stage page table mappings */
> kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2dad37f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_pmu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rivos Inc
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h>
> +#include <asm/csr.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_vcpu_pmu.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +
> +#define kvm_pmu_num_counters(pmu) ((pmu)->num_hw_ctrs + (pmu)->num_fw_ctrs)
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_num_ctrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> + retdata->out_val = kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> +
> + if (cidx > RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS || cidx == 1) {
> + retdata->err_val = SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + retdata->out_val = kvpmu->pmc[cidx].cinfo.value;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_start(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag, uint64_t ival,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_cfg_match(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ctr_base,
> + unsigned long ctr_mask, unsigned long flag,
> + unsigned long eidx, uint64_t evtdata,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_ctr_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cidx,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_return *retdata)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int i = 0, ret, num_hw_ctrs = 0, hpm_width = 0;
> + struct kvm_pmu *kvpmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> +
> + ret = riscv_pmu_get_hpm_info(&hpm_width, &num_hw_ctrs);
> + if (ret < 0 || !hpm_width || !num_hw_ctrs)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * It is guranteed that RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS can't exceed 32 as
> + * that may exceed total number of counters more than RISCV_MAX_COUNTERS
> + */
> + kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs = num_hw_ctrs;
> + kvpmu->num_fw_ctrs = RISCV_KVM_MAX_FW_CTRS;
> +
> + /*
> + * There is no correlation between the logical hardware counter and virtual counters.
> + * However, we need to encode a hpmcounter CSR in the counter info field so that
> + * KVM can trap n emulate the read. This works well in the migration use case as
> + * KVM doesn't care if the actual hpmcounter is available in the hardware or not.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < kvm_pmu_num_counters(kvpmu); i++) {
> + /* TIME CSR shouldn't be read from perf interface */
> + if (i == 1)
> + continue;
> + pmc = &kvpmu->pmc[i];
> + pmc->idx = i;
> + if (i < kvpmu->num_hw_ctrs) {
> + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW;
> + if (i < 3)
> + /* CY, IR counters */
> + pmc->cinfo.width = 63;
> + else
> + pmc->cinfo.width = hpm_width;
> + /*
> + * The CSR number doesn't have any relation with the logical
> + * hardware counters. The CSR numbers are encoded sequentially
> + * to avoid maintaining a map between the virtual counter
> + * and CSR number.
> + */
> + pmc->cinfo.csr = CSR_CYCLE + i;
> + } else {
> + pmc->cinfo.type = SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW;
> + pmc->cinfo.width = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + kvpmu->init_done = true;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + kvm_riscv_vcpu_pmu_deinit(vcpu);
> +}
> --
> 2.25.1
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.