arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-mtp.dts | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Bindings check fails as the schema expects the regulator node names to
have the suffix -regulators, so use the name and the id of the pmic to
compile the node name instead.
Fixes: 71342fb91eae ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add base SM8550 MTP dts")
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-mtp.dts | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-mtp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-mtp.dts
index 725d3bc3ee72..ec17226e11b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-mtp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-mtp.dts
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ vph_pwr: vph-pwr-regulator {
};
&apps_rsc {
- regulators-0 {
+ pm8550-b-rpmh-regulators {
compatible = "qcom,pm8550-rpmh-regulators";
qcom,pmic-id = "b";
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ vreg_l17b_2p5: ldo17 {
};
};
- regulators-1 {
+ pm8550vs-c-rpmh-regulators {
compatible = "qcom,pm8550vs-rpmh-regulators";
qcom,pmic-id = "c";
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ vreg_l3c_0p91: ldo3 {
};
};
- regulators-2 {
+ pm8550vs-d-rpmh-regulators {
compatible = "qcom,pm8550vs-rpmh-regulators";
qcom,pmic-id = "d";
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ vreg_l1d_0p88: ldo1 {
};
};
- regulators-3 {
+ pm8550vs-e-rpmh-regulators {
compatible = "qcom,pm8550vs-rpmh-regulators";
qcom,pmic-id = "e";
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ vreg_l3e_1p2: ldo3 {
};
};
- regulators-4 {
+ pm8550vs-f-rpmh-regulators {
compatible = "qcom,pm8550ve-rpmh-regulators";
qcom,pmic-id = "f";
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ vreg_l3f_0p91: ldo3 {
};
};
- regulators-5 {
+ pm8550vs-g-rpmh-regulators {
compatible = "qcom,pm8550vs-rpmh-regulators";
qcom,pmic-id = "g";
--
2.34.1
On 27/01/2023 14:01, Abel Vesa wrote: > Bindings check fails as the schema expects the regulator node names to > have the suffix -regulators, so use the name and the id of the pmic to > compile the node name instead. > > Fixes: 71342fb91eae ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add base SM8550 MTP dts") > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> > --- No, the original code is what we requested. You are making it now incorrect (although bindings need to catch up). See: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/9e805614-8d21-4f8b-1b31-790686c95aa5@linaro.org/T/#t Best regards, Krzysztof
On 23-01-27 16:33:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 27/01/2023 14:01, Abel Vesa wrote: > > Bindings check fails as the schema expects the regulator node names to > > have the suffix -regulators, so use the name and the id of the pmic to > > compile the node name instead. > > > > Fixes: 71342fb91eae ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add base SM8550 MTP dts") > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> > > --- > > No, the original code is what we requested. > > You are making it now incorrect (although bindings need to catch up). > > See: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/9e805614-8d21-4f8b-1b31-790686c95aa5@linaro.org/T/#t OK, fair point. Ignore this patch then. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.