Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst
index cc76b577d2f4..c150519bbf3f 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ created demonstration filesystems.
License
-------
-This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License, v2.
+This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License,
+v2.
Terminology
-----------
--
2.39.0
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:05:51PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> No patch description, really? > --- > Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst > index cc76b577d2f4..c150519bbf3f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ext4/about.rst > @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ created demonstration filesystems. > > License > ------- > -This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License, v2. > +This book is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, > +v2. The doc has already SPDX identifier above. Please remmove the sentence above instead. In recent days, I have seen the sudden influx of s/GNU Public License/GNU General Public License/g patches from you, for which many developers ask you to replace with SPDX identifier instead (see [1], [2], and [3]). Please do a tree-wide SPDX patch. Thanks. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ad99d227-ce82-319b-6323-b70ac009d0e7@roeck-us.net/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6d9053c6-b56e-51f4-db47-79264f1f5672@wanadoo.fr/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230122111707.68ddead6@hermes.local/ -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Monday, 23 January 2023 03:10:58 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:05:51PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> > > No patch description, really? Please disregard this patch. Next to 'style' issues, I now consider my initial view of the issue as a spelling error, incorrect. I would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also not the copyright holder which I believe is needed to change the license. Apologies for the noise.
On 1/23/23 19:44, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Monday, 23 January 2023 03:10:58 CET Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:05:51PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> >> >> No patch description, really? > > Please disregard this patch. > Next to 'style' issues, I now consider my initial view of the issue as a > spelling error, incorrect. I would be changing the license and IANAL. I'm also > not the copyright holder which I believe is needed to change the license. > > Apologies for the noise. Nice to see you reply to the review. However, as I noticed, it seems like your NAKed review replies have the same wording, which make me wonder if these are written by a bot behind your email handle. Next time, please write variate your writings (write using different words but convey the same meaning). I'm also sometimes hard to figure out which words should I write. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.