[PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: dts: freescale: apalis-imx8: fix reserved-memory node names

Marcel Ziswiler posted 17 patches 2 years, 7 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: dts: freescale: apalis-imx8: fix reserved-memory node names
Posted by Marcel Ziswiler 2 years, 7 months ago
From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>

Fix reserved-memory node names using dashes rather than underscores.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>

---

Changes in v4:
- New patch fixing reserved-memory node names.

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
index 70c00b92cb05..6217e0a48f96 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
@@ -133,17 +133,17 @@ reserved-memory {
 		#size-cells = <2>;
 		ranges;
 
-		decoder_boot: decoder_boot@84000000 {
+		decoder_boot: decoder-boot@84000000 {
 			no-map;
 			reg = <0 0x84000000 0 0x2000000>;
 		};
 
-		encoder1_boot: encoder1_boot@86000000 {
+		encoder1_boot: encoder1-boot@86000000 {
 			no-map;
 			reg = <0 0x86000000 0 0x200000>;
 		};
 
-		encoder2_boot: encoder2_boot@86200000 {
+		encoder2_boot: encoder2-boot@86200000 {
 			no-map;
 			reg = <0 0x86200000 0 0x200000>;
 		};
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ vdevbuffer: vdevbuffer@90400000 {
 			no-map;
 		};
 
-		decoder_rpc: decoder_rpc@92000000 {
+		decoder_rpc: decoder-rpc@92000000 {
 			no-map;
 			reg = <0 0x92000000 0 0x200000>;
 		};
@@ -180,12 +180,12 @@ dsp_reserved: dsp@92400000 {
 			reg = <0 0x92400000 0 0x2000000>;
 		};
 
-		encoder1_rpc: encoder1_rpc@94400000 {
+		encoder1_rpc: encoder1-rpc@94400000 {
 			no-map;
 			reg = <0 0x94400000 0 0x700000>;
 		};
 
-		encoder2_rpc: encoder2_rpc@94b00000 {
+		encoder2_rpc: encoder2-rpc@94b00000 {
 			no-map;
 			reg = <0 0x94b00000 0 0x700000>;
 		};
-- 
2.35.1
Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: dts: freescale: apalis-imx8: fix reserved-memory node names
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 2 years, 7 months ago
On 18/01/2023 08:26, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
> 
> Fix reserved-memory node names using dashes rather than underscores.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - New patch fixing reserved-memory node names.
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> index 70c00b92cb05..6217e0a48f96 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> @@ -133,17 +133,17 @@ reserved-memory {
>  		#size-cells = <2>;
>  		ranges;
>  
> -		decoder_boot: decoder_boot@84000000 {
> +		decoder_boot: decoder-boot@84000000 {

This is ridiculous. You just added it! If we consider original code as
wrong, then you intentionally added wrong code just to fix it.

No, that's not the way how it should be developed.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: dts: freescale: apalis-imx8: fix reserved-memory node names
Posted by Marcel Ziswiler 2 years, 7 months ago
On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 15:02 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/01/2023 08:26, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
> > 
> > Fix reserved-memory node names using dashes rather than underscores.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> > - New patch fixing reserved-memory node names.
> > 
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-
> > apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> > index 70c00b92cb05..6217e0a48f96 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> > @@ -133,17 +133,17 @@ reserved-memory {
> >                 #size-cells = <2>;
> >                 ranges;
> >  
> > -               decoder_boot: decoder_boot@84000000 {
> > +               decoder_boot: decoder-boot@84000000 {
> 
> This is ridiculous. You just added it! If we consider original code as
> wrong, then you intentionally added wrong code just to fix it.
> 
> No, that's not the way how it should be developed.

Shawn asked me to ease the review process which is exactly what I did.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: dts: freescale: apalis-imx8: fix reserved-memory node names
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 2 years, 7 months ago
On 18/01/2023 15:36, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 15:02 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/01/2023 08:26, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
>>> From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
>>>
>>> Fix reserved-memory node names using dashes rather than underscores.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - New patch fixing reserved-memory node names.
>>>
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-
>>> apalis-v1.1.dtsi
>>> index 70c00b92cb05..6217e0a48f96 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
>>> @@ -133,17 +133,17 @@ reserved-memory {
>>>                 #size-cells = <2>;
>>>                 ranges;
>>>  
>>> -               decoder_boot: decoder_boot@84000000 {
>>> +               decoder_boot: decoder-boot@84000000 {
>>
>> This is ridiculous. You just added it! If we consider original code as
>> wrong, then you intentionally added wrong code just to fix it.
>>
>> No, that's not the way how it should be developed.
> 
> Shawn asked me to ease the review process which is exactly what I did.

Any reason why b4 diff cannot be used? If your patchset fails b4
auto-detection of version, this should be fixed instead of fake split.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] arm64: dts: freescale: apalis-imx8: fix reserved-memory node names
Posted by Marcel Ziswiler 2 years, 7 months ago
On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 15:37 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/01/2023 15:36, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 15:02 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 18/01/2023 08:26, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
> > > > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Fix reserved-memory node names using dashes rather than underscores.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > - New patch fixing reserved-memory node names.
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi | 12 ++++++------
> > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-
> > > > apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> > > > index 70c00b92cb05..6217e0a48f96 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8-apalis-v1.1.dtsi
> > > > @@ -133,17 +133,17 @@ reserved-memory {
> > > >                 #size-cells = <2>;
> > > >                 ranges;
> > > >  
> > > > -               decoder_boot: decoder_boot@84000000 {
> > > > +               decoder_boot: decoder-boot@84000000 {
> > > 
> > > This is ridiculous. You just added it! If we consider original code as
> > > wrong, then you intentionally added wrong code just to fix it.
> > > 
> > > No, that's not the way how it should be developed.
> > 
> > Shawn asked me to ease the review process which is exactly what I did.
> 
> Any reason why b4 diff cannot be used? If your patchset fails b4
> auto-detection of version, this should be fixed instead of fake split.

Sorry, I did not know anything about this b4 diff stuff and will avoid such splitting in the future. Thanks!

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof