On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
index 9c9184f94c44..8e9031bbde73 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ required:
   - compatible
   - reg
   - reg-names
-  - vdds-supply
 
 unevaluatedProperties: false
 
-- 
2.39.0

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:51:32 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] dt-bindings: msm/dsi: Don't require vdds-supply on 7nm PHY
      https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4ff00ebb193a

Best regards,
-- 
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.

I think we should have an explicit `if compatible then required:
vdds-supply' clause. WDYT?

>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> index 9c9184f94c44..8e9031bbde73 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
>    - reg-names
> -  - vdds-supply
>
>  unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> --
> 2.39.0
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

On 16.01.2023 13:52, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
>> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
>> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
> 
> I think we should have an explicit `if compatible then required:
> vdds-supply' clause. WDYT?
Well, the driver will still probe and function without it,
so I'm not sure if it's strictly required..


Konrad
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> index 9c9184f94c44..8e9031bbde73 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ required:
>>    - compatible
>>    - reg
>>    - reg-names
>> -  - vdds-supply
>>
>>  unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> --
>> 2.39.0
>>
> 
>

On 16/01/2023 12:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> ---


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof