Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst | 2 + Documentation/mm/page_reclaim.rst | 2 + Documentation/mm/physical_memory.rst | 346 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 350 insertions(+)
Hi, Last year at LSF/MM Matthew promptly created the new structure for MM documentation, but there still was no patches with content. I've started to work on it a while ago and I wanted to send it out in a more complete form, but I've got distracted and didn't have time to work on this. With fast changes around struct page and the threat of Lorenzo's book, I've decided to send out what I have till now with a hope that we can really make this a collaborative effort with people filling paragraph here and there. If somebody does not feel like sending formal patches, just send me the "raw" text my way and I'll deal with the rest. The text is relatively heavily formatted because I believe the target audience will prefer html version. v4: * squash commits into one (Bagas) * fix references formatting (kbuild) * add Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230112091616.824565-1-rppt@kernel.org * rephrase ZONE_DMA(32) and ZONE_MOVABLE description (Michal) * add cross-reference to DMA API v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230110152358.2641910-1-rppt@kernel.org * rephrase the paragraph inroducing zones (Lorenzo) * update formatting (Bagas) * add section stubs (Bagas) * small fixes here and there v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230101094523.1522109-1-rppt@kernel.org Mike Rapoport (IBM) (1): docs/mm: Physical Memory: add structure, introduction and nodes description Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst | 2 + Documentation/mm/page_reclaim.rst | 2 + Documentation/mm/physical_memory.rst | 346 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 350 insertions(+) -- 2.35.1
Gentle ping. On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 08:42:11PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi, > > Last year at LSF/MM Matthew promptly created the new structure for MM > documentation, but there still was no patches with content. > > I've started to work on it a while ago and I wanted to send it out in a > more complete form, but I've got distracted and didn't have time to work > on this. > > With fast changes around struct page and the threat of Lorenzo's book, > I've decided to send out what I have till now with a hope that we can > really make this a collaborative effort with people filling paragraph > here and there. > > If somebody does not feel like sending formal patches, just send me the > "raw" text my way and I'll deal with the rest. > > The text is relatively heavily formatted because I believe the target > audience will prefer html version. > > v4: > * squash commits into one (Bagas) > * fix references formatting (kbuild) > * add Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags > > v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230112091616.824565-1-rppt@kernel.org > * rephrase ZONE_DMA(32) and ZONE_MOVABLE description (Michal) > * add cross-reference to DMA API > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230110152358.2641910-1-rppt@kernel.org > * rephrase the paragraph inroducing zones (Lorenzo) > * update formatting (Bagas) > * add section stubs (Bagas) > * small fixes here and there > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230101094523.1522109-1-rppt@kernel.org > > Mike Rapoport (IBM) (1): > docs/mm: Physical Memory: add structure, introduction and nodes > description > > Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst | 2 + > Documentation/mm/page_reclaim.rst | 2 + > Documentation/mm/physical_memory.rst | 346 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 350 insertions(+) > > -- > 2.35.1 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> writes: > Gentle ping. Is that your way of saying that you think it's perhaps ready to be applied? I've been watching the discussion but wasn't sure if things have settled or not. Thanks, jon
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 10:43:06AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> writes: > > > Gentle ping. > > Is that your way of saying that you think it's perhaps ready to be > applied? I've been watching the discussion but wasn't sure if things > have settled or not. Well, everybody who participated in the discussion acked the patch, so yeah, I think it's ready ;-) > Thanks, > > jon
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.