On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 12:59 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/01/2023 06:42, Moudy Ho wrote:
> > For MT8195, VPPSYS0 and VPPSYS1 are 2 display pipes with
> > hardware differences in power domains, clocks and subsystem counts,
> > which should be determined by compatible names.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@mediatek.com>
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yaml |
> > 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > index 84de12709323..27d2631d43d3 100644
> > ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mmsys.yam
> > l
> > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ properties:
> > - mediatek,mt8188-vdosys0
> > - mediatek,mt8192-mmsys
> > - mediatek,mt8365-mmsys
> > + - mediatek,mt8195-vppsys0
> > + - mediatek,mt8195-vppsys1
>
> That's broken order and I did not ack something like this. What's
> happening with these patches?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Hi Krzysztof,
Apologize for the tag not being removed and the wrong alpha-order.
These will be corrected in the next version.
Thanks & Regards,
Moudy