drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 46 +----------------------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 45 deletions(-)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
The tsens driver reprogram the next trip points in the irq
handler. This function then call thermal_zone_device_update().
However, thermal_zone_device_update() calls thermal_zone_set_trips()
and from there it calls the backend 'set_trips' ops. This one in turn
reprogram the next trip points (low/high).
Consequently, the code setting the next trip points interrupt in the
interrupt handle is not needed and could be removed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>
---
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 46 +-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
index b5b136ff323f..58693ee8c430 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
@@ -472,52 +472,8 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
continue;
if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d))
continue;
- ret = get_temp_tsens_valid(s, &temp);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: error reading sensor\n",
- hw_id, __func__);
- continue;
- }
- spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
-
- tsens_read_irq_state(priv, hw_id, s, &d);
-
- if (d.up_viol &&
- !masked_irq(hw_id, d.up_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) {
- tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, disable);
- if (d.up_thresh > temp) {
- dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm upper\n",
- hw_id, __func__);
- tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, enable);
- } else {
- trigger = true;
- /* Keep irq masked */
- }
- } else if (d.low_viol &&
- !masked_irq(hw_id, d.low_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) {
- tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, disable);
- if (d.low_thresh < temp) {
- dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm low\n",
- hw_id, __func__);
- tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, enable);
- } else {
- trigger = true;
- /* Keep irq masked */
- }
- }
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
-
- if (trigger) {
- dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: TZ update trigger (%d mC)\n",
- hw_id, __func__, temp);
- thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd,
- THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
- } else {
- dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: no violation: %d\n",
- hw_id, __func__, temp);
- }
+ thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) {
/* Constraint: There is only 1 interrupt control register for all
--
2.34.1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 4:04 PM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > > The tsens driver reprogram the next trip points in the irq > handler. This function then call thermal_zone_device_update(). > > However, thermal_zone_device_update() calls thermal_zone_set_trips() > and from there it calls the backend 'set_trips' ops. This one in turn > reprogram the next trip points (low/high). > > Consequently, the code setting the next trip points interrupt in the > interrupt handle is not needed and could be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org> Acked-by: Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 46 +----------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 45 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > index b5b136ff323f..58693ee8c430 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > @@ -472,52 +472,8 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > continue; > if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d)) > continue; > - ret = get_temp_tsens_valid(s, &temp); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: error reading sensor\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - continue; > - } > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->ul_lock, flags); > - > - tsens_read_irq_state(priv, hw_id, s, &d); > - > - if (d.up_viol && > - !masked_irq(hw_id, d.up_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) { > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, disable); > - if (d.up_thresh > temp) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm upper\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, enable); > - } else { > - trigger = true; > - /* Keep irq masked */ > - } > - } else if (d.low_viol && > - !masked_irq(hw_id, d.low_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) { > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, disable); > - if (d.low_thresh < temp) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm low\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, enable); > - } else { > - trigger = true; > - /* Keep irq masked */ > - } > - } > - > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags); > - > - if (trigger) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: TZ update trigger (%d mC)\n", > - hw_id, __func__, temp); > - thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, > - THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED); > - } else { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: no violation: %d\n", > - hw_id, __func__, temp); > - } > + thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED); > > if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) { > /* Constraint: There is only 1 interrupt control register for all > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:34:20AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > > The tsens driver reprogram the next trip points in the irq > handler. This function then call thermal_zone_device_update(). > > However, thermal_zone_device_update() calls thermal_zone_set_trips() > and from there it calls the backend 'set_trips' ops. This one in turn > reprogram the next trip points (low/high). > > Consequently, the code setting the next trip points interrupt in the > interrupt handle is not needed and could be removed. > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org> The last one should be the address you sent your patch from, and that was the first one. So I think you should drop this one. Regards, Bjorn > --- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 46 +----------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 45 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > index b5b136ff323f..58693ee8c430 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > @@ -472,52 +472,8 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > continue; > if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d)) > continue; > - ret = get_temp_tsens_valid(s, &temp); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: error reading sensor\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - continue; > - } > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->ul_lock, flags); > - > - tsens_read_irq_state(priv, hw_id, s, &d); > - > - if (d.up_viol && > - !masked_irq(hw_id, d.up_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) { > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, disable); > - if (d.up_thresh > temp) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm upper\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, enable); > - } else { > - trigger = true; > - /* Keep irq masked */ > - } > - } else if (d.low_viol && > - !masked_irq(hw_id, d.low_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) { > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, disable); > - if (d.low_thresh < temp) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm low\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, enable); > - } else { > - trigger = true; > - /* Keep irq masked */ > - } > - } > - > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags); > - > - if (trigger) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: TZ update trigger (%d mC)\n", > - hw_id, __func__, temp); > - thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, > - THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED); > - } else { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: no violation: %d\n", > - hw_id, __func__, temp); > - } > + thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED); > > if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) { > /* Constraint: There is only 1 interrupt control register for all > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 10/01/2023 19:13, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:34:20AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> >> The tsens driver reprogram the next trip points in the irq >> handler. This function then call thermal_zone_device_update(). >> >> However, thermal_zone_device_update() calls thermal_zone_set_trips() >> and from there it calls the backend 'set_trips' ops. This one in turn >> reprogram the next trip points (low/high). >> >> Consequently, the code setting the next trip points interrupt in the >> interrupt handle is not needed and could be removed. >> > > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org> > > The last one should be the address you sent your patch from, and that > was the first one. So I think you should drop this one. Thanks for the review. I'll remove the duplicated SoB. -- Daniel -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:34 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > > From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > > The tsens driver reprogram the next trip points in the irq > handler. This function then call thermal_zone_device_update(). > > However, thermal_zone_device_update() calls thermal_zone_set_trips() > and from there it calls the backend 'set_trips' ops. This one in turn > reprogram the next trip points (low/high). > > Consequently, the code setting the next trip points interrupt in the > interrupt handle is not needed and could be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org> I'm wondering what you wanted to say through these S-o-b tags. I don't think you have to sign off your own patch again. > --- > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 46 +----------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 45 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > index b5b136ff323f..58693ee8c430 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c > @@ -472,52 +472,8 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > continue; > if (!tsens_threshold_violated(priv, hw_id, &d)) > continue; > - ret = get_temp_tsens_valid(s, &temp); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: error reading sensor\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - continue; > - } > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->ul_lock, flags); > - > - tsens_read_irq_state(priv, hw_id, s, &d); > - > - if (d.up_viol && > - !masked_irq(hw_id, d.up_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) { > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, disable); > - if (d.up_thresh > temp) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm upper\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, enable); > - } else { > - trigger = true; > - /* Keep irq masked */ > - } > - } else if (d.low_viol && > - !masked_irq(hw_id, d.low_irq_mask, tsens_version(priv))) { > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, disable); > - if (d.low_thresh < temp) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: re-arm low\n", > - hw_id, __func__); > - tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, enable); > - } else { > - trigger = true; > - /* Keep irq masked */ > - } > - } > - > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags); > - > - if (trigger) { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: TZ update trigger (%d mC)\n", > - hw_id, __func__, temp); > - thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, > - THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED); > - } else { > - dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: no violation: %d\n", > - hw_id, __func__, temp); > - } > + thermal_zone_device_update(s->tzd, THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED); > > if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) { > /* Constraint: There is only 1 interrupt control register for all > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 10/01/2023 14:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:34 AM Daniel Lezcano > <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> >> The tsens driver reprogram the next trip points in the irq >> handler. This function then call thermal_zone_device_update(). >> >> However, thermal_zone_device_update() calls thermal_zone_set_trips() >> and from there it calls the backend 'set_trips' ops. This one in turn >> reprogram the next trip points (low/high). >> >> Consequently, the code setting the next trip points interrupt in the >> interrupt handle is not needed and could be removed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org> > > I'm wondering what you wanted to say through these S-o-b tags. > > I don't think you have to sign off your own patch again. Yes, I changed a configuration in my git tree, something I have to fix. That has to be considered as duplicate SoB -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.