kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
No need to check for negative return value from snprintf() as the
code does not return negative values. Replace snprintf with memcpy.
Signed-off-by: Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com>
-----
V1 -> V2: memory allc uses kzalloc and replace snprintf with memcpy
---
kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
index 352b65e2b910..56eb39f495f6 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static int trace_eprobe_tp_update_arg(struct trace_eprobe *ep, const char *argv[
static int trace_eprobe_parse_filter(struct trace_eprobe *ep, int argc, const char *argv[])
{
struct event_filter *dummy = NULL;
- int i, ret, len = 0;
+ int i, ret, arg_len, len = 0;
char *p;
if (argc == 0) {
@@ -923,17 +923,17 @@ static int trace_eprobe_parse_filter(struct trace_eprobe *ep, int argc, const ch
p = ep->filter_str;
for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) {
- ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s ", argv[i]);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto error;
- if (ret > len) {
- ret = -E2BIG;
- goto error;
- }
- p += ret;
- len -= ret;
+ arg_len = strlen(argv[i]);
+ memcpy((void *)p, argv[i], arg_len);
+
+ if (i == argc - 1)
+ p[arg_len] = '\0';
+ else
+ p[arg_len] = ' ';
+
+ p += arg_len + 1;
+ len -= arg_len + 1;
}
- p[-1] = '\0';
/*
* Ensure the filter string can be parsed correctly. Note, this
--
2.31.1
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 11:32:13 +0800 Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com> wrote: > @@ -923,17 +923,17 @@ static int trace_eprobe_parse_filter(struct trace_eprobe *ep, int argc, const ch > > p = ep->filter_str; > for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) { > - ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s ", argv[i]); > - if (ret < 0) > - goto error; > - if (ret > len) { > - ret = -E2BIG; > - goto error; > - } > - p += ret; > - len -= ret; > + arg_len = strlen(argv[i]); > + memcpy((void *)p, argv[i], arg_len); > + > + if (i == argc - 1) > + p[arg_len] = '\0'; > + else > + p[arg_len] = ' '; > + > + p += arg_len + 1; > + len -= arg_len + 1; > } The above is too complex. I mentioned strncat() but you could still just keep snprintf() too, which adds the '\0'; for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) { if (i) ret = snprintf(p, len, " %s", argv[i]); else ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s", argv[i]); p += ret; len -= ret; } -- Steve > - p[-1] = '\0'; > > /* > * Ensure the filter string can be parsed correctly. Note, this
Thanks, I'll check it out. Thanks !! On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:52 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 11:32:13 +0800 > Quanfa Fu <quanfafu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > @@ -923,17 +923,17 @@ static int trace_eprobe_parse_filter(struct trace_eprobe *ep, int argc, const ch > > > > p = ep->filter_str; > > for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) { > > - ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s ", argv[i]); > > - if (ret < 0) > > - goto error; > > - if (ret > len) { > > - ret = -E2BIG; > > - goto error; > > - } > > - p += ret; > > - len -= ret; > > + arg_len = strlen(argv[i]); > > + memcpy((void *)p, argv[i], arg_len); > > + > > + if (i == argc - 1) > > + p[arg_len] = '\0'; > > + else > > + p[arg_len] = ' '; > > + > > + p += arg_len + 1; > > + len -= arg_len + 1; > > } > > The above is too complex. I mentioned strncat() but you could still > just keep snprintf() too, which adds the '\0'; > > for (i = 0; i < argc; i++) { > if (i) > ret = snprintf(p, len, " %s", argv[i]); > else > ret = snprintf(p, len, "%s", argv[i]); > p += ret; > len -= ret; > } > > -- Steve > > > - p[-1] = '\0'; > > > > /* > > * Ensure the filter string can be parsed correctly. Note, this
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.