From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>

Compilation complains that two possible variables are used without
initialization:

drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_list' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]

Fix both warnings by adding initialization with sg_cnt = 0, sg_list = NULL.

Fixes: 6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg")
Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Xiaosen He <quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
index 0044029bcf7b..0d38e7fa34cc 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
@@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static int ufs_bsg_exec_advanced_rpmb_req(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct bsg_job *j
 	struct ufs_rpmb_reply *rpmb_reply = job->reply;
 	struct bsg_buffer *payload = NULL;
 	enum dma_data_direction dir;
-	struct scatterlist *sg_list;
+	struct scatterlist *sg_list = NULL;
 	int rpmb_req_type;
-	int sg_cnt;
+	int sg_cnt = 0;
 	int ret;
 	int data_len;
 
-- 
2.25.1

On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 11:40:55PM +0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> 
> Compilation complains that two possible variables are used without
> initialization:
> 
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_list' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> 
> Fix both warnings by adding initialization with sg_cnt = 0, sg_list = NULL.
> 
> Fixes: 6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg")
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Xiaosen He <quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

Thanks for the patch!
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

We also got a report from KernelCI:

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/63be5f73.170a0220.16f9f.8b91@mx.google.com/
Reported-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>

> ---
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> index 0044029bcf7b..0d38e7fa34cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static int ufs_bsg_exec_advanced_rpmb_req(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct bsg_job *j
>  	struct ufs_rpmb_reply *rpmb_reply = job->reply;
>  	struct bsg_buffer *payload = NULL;
>  	enum dma_data_direction dir;
> -	struct scatterlist *sg_list;
> +	struct scatterlist *sg_list = NULL;
>  	int rpmb_req_type;
> -	int sg_cnt;
> +	int sg_cnt = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  	int data_len;
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
>