Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc
notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(),
eliminating a kernel-doc warning:

kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
---
 kernel/seccomp.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -- a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
 }
 #endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */
 
+#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 /**
  * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
  * @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
@@ -397,7 +398,6 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_a
  *
  * Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
  */
-#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
 			       struct seccomp_filter **match)
 {

On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 18:12:28 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc
> notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(),
> eliminating a kernel-doc warning:
> 
> kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next/seccomp, thanks!

[1/1] seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/0fb0624b15d2

-- 
Kees Cook