tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
The mm_numa_cid related rseq patches from the series were not picked up
into the tip tree, so enabling the mm_numa_cid test needs to be
reverted.
This reverts commit b344b8f2d88dbf095caf97ac57fd3645843fa70f.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202301040903.2dd1e25b-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
index 603b3b69d20c..8d31426ab41f 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
@@ -47,11 +47,6 @@ function do_tests()
./param_test_mm_cid ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
echo "Running mm_cid compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
./param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
-
- echo "Running mm_numa_cid test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
- ./param_test_mm_numa_cid ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
- echo "Running mm_numa_cid compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
- ./param_test_mm_numa_cid_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} -t ${NR_THREADS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
let "i++"
done
}
--
2.25.1
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:35:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > The mm_numa_cid related rseq patches from the series were not picked up > into the tip tree, so enabling the mm_numa_cid test needs to be > reverted. > > This reverts commit b344b8f2d88dbf095caf97ac57fd3645843fa70f. Oh my bad, I got confused between the regular numa_id (which I did do merge, right?) and the fancy numa_cid, which I indeed didn't merge yet. I meant to give that a wee bit more thought, but that sadly hasn't happened yet :/ Applied, thanks!
On 2023-01-11 09:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:35:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> The mm_numa_cid related rseq patches from the series were not picked up >> into the tip tree, so enabling the mm_numa_cid test needs to be >> reverted. >> >> This reverts commit b344b8f2d88dbf095caf97ac57fd3645843fa70f. > > Oh my bad, I got confused between the regular numa_id (which I did do > merge, right?) and the fancy numa_cid, which I indeed didn't merge yet. Yes, that's indeed what happened. > I meant to give that a wee bit more thought, but that sadly hasn't > happened yet :/ > > Applied, thanks! No worries, let me know when you have time to discuss the fancy numa_cid some more. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.