fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
em->len is incorrectly asserted which is leading to it's
assignment to sectorsize instead of being check for it.
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 8bcad9940154..e49358048a98 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7092,7 +7092,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
* Other members are not utilized for inline extents.
*/
ASSERT(em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE);
- ASSERT(em->len = fs_info->sectorsize);
+ ASSERT(em->len == fs_info->sectorsize);
ret = read_inline_extent(inode, path, page);
if (ret < 0)
--
2.34.1
On 12/31/22 23:05, Tanmay Bhushan wrote: > em->len is incorrectly asserted which is leading to it's > assignment to sectorsize instead of being check for it. > > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > index 8bcad9940154..e49358048a98 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > @@ -7092,7 +7092,7 @@ struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > * Other members are not utilized for inline extents. > */ > ASSERT(em->block_start == EXTENT_MAP_INLINE); > - ASSERT(em->len = fs_info->sectorsize); > + ASSERT(em->len == fs_info->sectorsize); Good catch. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> > > ret = read_inline_extent(inode, path, page); > if (ret < 0)
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 04:05:01PM +0100, Tanmay Bhushan wrote: > em->len is incorrectly asserted which is leading to it's > assignment to sectorsize instead of being check for it. > > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com> Added to misc-next, thanks.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.