From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>

Compilation complains that two possible variables are used without
initialization:

drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_list' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]

Fix both warnings by adding initialization with sg_cnt = 0, sg_list = NULL.

Fixes: 6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg")
Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Xiaosen He <quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com>
---
Hi Martin,

This patch is to fix two compilation warnings introduced by my commit:
6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg").

Apologies for this.

---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
index 0044029bcf7b..0d38e7fa34cc 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
@@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static int ufs_bsg_exec_advanced_rpmb_req(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct bsg_job *j
 	struct ufs_rpmb_reply *rpmb_reply = job->reply;
 	struct bsg_buffer *payload = NULL;
 	enum dma_data_direction dir;
-	struct scatterlist *sg_list;
+	struct scatterlist *sg_list = NULL;
 	int rpmb_req_type;
-	int sg_cnt;
+	int sg_cnt = 0;
 	int ret;
 	int data_len;
 
-- 
2.25.1

Hi Bean,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bean Huo [mailto:beanhuo@iokpp.de]
>Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2022 8:34 PM
>To: alim.akhtar@samsung.com; avri.altman@wdc.com; jejb@linux.ibm.com;
>martin.petersen@oracle.com; beanhuo@micron.com; bvanassche@acm.org;
>quic_cang@quicinc.com; quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com
>Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel test
>robot <lkp@intel.com>
>Subject: [PATCH ] scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Fix sometimes-uninitialized
warnings
>
>From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
>
>Compilation complains that two possible variables are used without
>initialization:
>
>drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_cnt' is used
>uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_list' is used
>uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>
>Fix both warnings by adding initialization with sg_cnt = 0, sg_list = NULL.
>
>Fixes: 6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in
>ufs_bsg")
>Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
>Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>Reported-by: Xiaosen He <quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com>
>---

Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>

>Hi Martin,
>
>This patch is to fix two compilation warnings introduced by my commit:
>6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in
ufs_bsg").
>
>Apologies for this.
>
>---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c index
>0044029bcf7b..0d38e7fa34cc 100644
>--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
>+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
>@@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static int ufs_bsg_exec_advanced_rpmb_req(struct
>ufs_hba *hba, struct bsg_job *j
> 	struct ufs_rpmb_reply *rpmb_reply = job->reply;
> 	struct bsg_buffer *payload = NULL;
> 	enum dma_data_direction dir;
>-	struct scatterlist *sg_list;
>+	struct scatterlist *sg_list = NULL;
> 	int rpmb_req_type;
>-	int sg_cnt;
>+	int sg_cnt = 0;
> 	int ret;
> 	int data_len;
>
>--
>2.25.1