From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings.
Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/boot.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/boot.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/boot.c
index 85abd0a2d1c9..f481c2e3dbc8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/boot.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/boot.c
@@ -41,12 +41,9 @@ static int wlcore_boot_parse_fw_ver(struct wl1271 *wl,
{
int ret;
- strncpy(wl->chip.fw_ver_str, static_data->fw_version,
+ strscpy(wl->chip.fw_ver_str, static_data->fw_version,
sizeof(wl->chip.fw_ver_str));
- /* make sure the string is NULL-terminated */
- wl->chip.fw_ver_str[sizeof(wl->chip.fw_ver_str) - 1] = '\0';
-
ret = sscanf(wl->chip.fw_ver_str + 4, "%u.%u.%u.%u.%u",
&wl->chip.fw_ver[0], &wl->chip.fw_ver[1],
&wl->chip.fw_ver[2], &wl->chip.fw_ver[3],
--
2.15.2