drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
It is unable to use configfs to attach more than one gadget. When
attaching the second gadget, it always fails and the kernel message
prints out:
Error: Driver 'configfs-gadget' is already registered, aborting...
UDC core: g1: driver registration failed: -16
This commit fixes the problem by a ".N" suffix added to each
configfs_gadget's driver name (where N is a unique ID number),
thus making the names distinct.
Fixes: fc274c1e9973 ("USB: gadget: Add a new bus for gadgets")
Signed-off-by: Chanh Nguyen <chanh@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Replace scnprintf() by kasprintf() to simplify the code [CJ]
- Move the clean up code from gadgets_drop() to
gadget_info_attr_release() [Frank Li]
- Correct the resource free up in gadges_make() [Alan Stern]
- Remove the unnecessary variable in gadgets_make() [Chanh]
- Fixes minor grammar issue in commit message [Chanh]
---
drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
index 96121d1c8df4..7faf68bfa716 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
#include <linux/nls.h>
#include <linux/usb/composite.h>
@@ -11,6 +12,8 @@
#include "u_f.h"
#include "u_os_desc.h"
+static DEFINE_IDA(driver_id_numbers);
+
int check_user_usb_string(const char *name,
struct usb_gadget_strings *stringtab_dev)
{
@@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ struct gadget_info {
char qw_sign[OS_STRING_QW_SIGN_LEN];
spinlock_t spinlock;
bool unbind;
+
+ /* Make driver names unique */
+ int driver_id_number;
};
static inline struct gadget_info *to_gadget_info(struct config_item *item)
@@ -393,6 +399,8 @@ static void gadget_info_attr_release(struct config_item *item)
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&gi->string_list));
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&gi->available_func));
kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.function);
+ kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name);
+ ida_free(&driver_id_numbers, gi->driver_id_number);
kfree(gi);
}
@@ -1623,13 +1631,28 @@ static struct config_group *gadgets_make(
gi->composite.gadget_driver = configfs_driver_template;
+ gi->driver_id_number = ida_alloc(&driver_id_numbers, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (gi->driver_id_number < 0)
+ goto err;
+
+ gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
+ "configfs-gadget.%d",
+ gi->driver_id_number);
+ if (!gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name)
+ goto out_free_driver_id_number;
+
gi->composite.gadget_driver.function = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
gi->composite.name = gi->composite.gadget_driver.function;
if (!gi->composite.gadget_driver.function)
- goto err;
+ goto out_free_driver_name;
return &gi->group;
+
+out_free_driver_name:
+ kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name);
+out_free_driver_id_number:
+ ida_free(&driver_id_numbers, gi->driver_id_number);
err:
kfree(gi);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
--
2.17.1
Hi, W dniu 21.12.2022 o 10:13, Chanh Nguyen pisze: > It is unable to use configfs to attach more than one gadget. When > attaching the second gadget, it always fails and the kernel message > prints out: > > Error: Driver 'configfs-gadget' is already registered, aborting... > UDC core: g1: driver registration failed: -16 > I assume you are interested in a scenario where there is more than one UDC available which means you can have more than one active gadget? > This commit fixes the problem by a ".N" suffix added to each > configfs_gadget's driver name (where N is a unique ID number), > thus making the names distinct. > > Fixes: fc274c1e9973 ("USB: gadget: Add a new bus for gadgets") > Signed-off-by: Chanh Nguyen <chanh@os.amperecomputing.com> > > --- > Changes in v2: > - Replace scnprintf() by kasprintf() to simplify the code [CJ] > - Move the clean up code from gadgets_drop() to > gadget_info_attr_release() [Frank Li] > - Correct the resource free up in gadges_make() [Alan Stern] > - Remove the unnecessary variable in gadgets_make() [Chanh] > - Fixes minor grammar issue in commit message [Chanh] > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c > index 96121d1c8df4..7faf68bfa716 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/device.h> > +#include <linux/idr.h> > #include <linux/kstrtox.h> > #include <linux/nls.h> > #include <linux/usb/composite.h> > @@ -11,6 +12,8 @@ > #include "u_f.h" > #include "u_os_desc.h" > > +static DEFINE_IDA(driver_id_numbers); > + > int check_user_usb_string(const char *name, > struct usb_gadget_strings *stringtab_dev) > { > @@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ struct gadget_info { > char qw_sign[OS_STRING_QW_SIGN_LEN]; > spinlock_t spinlock; > bool unbind; > + > + /* Make driver names unique */ > + int driver_id_number; > }; > > static inline struct gadget_info *to_gadget_info(struct config_item *item) > @@ -393,6 +399,8 @@ static void gadget_info_attr_release(struct config_item *item) > WARN_ON(!list_empty(&gi->string_list)); > WARN_ON(!list_empty(&gi->available_func)); > kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.function); > + kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name); > + ida_free(&driver_id_numbers, gi->driver_id_number); > kfree(gi); > } > > @@ -1623,13 +1631,28 @@ static struct config_group *gadgets_make( > > gi->composite.gadget_driver = configfs_driver_template; > > + gi->driver_id_number = ida_alloc(&driver_id_numbers, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (gi->driver_id_number < 0) > + goto err; > + > + gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, > + "configfs-gadget.%d", > + gi->driver_id_number); I'm wondering if it maybe makes more sense to use the gadget name as a suffix instead? gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "configfs-gadget.%s" name); So that when you mkdir g1 you will ultimately see /sys/bus/gadget/drivers/configfs-gadget.g1 instead of /sys/bus/gadget/drivers/configfs-gadget.0 Gadget names are guaranteed to be unique because they are created as sibling subdirectories in configfs. Your patch would then be greatly simplified (no need for ida). Regards, Andrzej > + if (!gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name) > + goto out_free_driver_id_number; > + > gi->composite.gadget_driver.function = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); > gi->composite.name = gi->composite.gadget_driver.function; > > if (!gi->composite.gadget_driver.function) > - goto err; > + goto out_free_driver_name; > > return &gi->group; > + > +out_free_driver_name: > + kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name); > +out_free_driver_id_number: > + ida_free(&driver_id_numbers, gi->driver_id_number); > err: > kfree(gi); > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
On 22/12/2022 22:20, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > Hi, > > W dniu 21.12.2022 o 10:13, Chanh Nguyen pisze: >> It is unable to use configfs to attach more than one gadget. When >> attaching the second gadget, it always fails and the kernel message >> prints out: >> >> Error: Driver 'configfs-gadget' is already registered, aborting... >> UDC core: g1: driver registration failed: -16 >> > > I assume you are interested in a scenario where there is more than one > UDC available which means you can have more than one active gadget? > Yes, I'd like to have more active gadgets. For example, mass_storage and ecm usb, ... >> This commit fixes the problem by a ".N" suffix added to each >> configfs_gadget's driver name (where N is a unique ID number), >> thus making the names distinct. >> >> Fixes: fc274c1e9973 ("USB: gadget: Add a new bus for gadgets") >> Signed-off-by: Chanh Nguyen <chanh@os.amperecomputing.com> >> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - Replace scnprintf() by kasprintf() to simplify the code [CJ] >> - Move the clean up code from gadgets_drop() to >> gadget_info_attr_release() [Frank Li] >> - Correct the resource free up in gadges_make() [Alan Stern] >> - Remove the unnecessary variable in gadgets_make() [Chanh] >> - Fixes minor grammar issue in commit message [Chanh] >> --- >> drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c >> b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c >> index 96121d1c8df4..7faf68bfa716 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/configfs.c >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/slab.h> >> #include <linux/device.h> >> +#include <linux/idr.h> >> #include <linux/kstrtox.h> >> #include <linux/nls.h> >> #include <linux/usb/composite.h> >> @@ -11,6 +12,8 @@ >> #include "u_f.h" >> #include "u_os_desc.h" >> +static DEFINE_IDA(driver_id_numbers); >> + >> int check_user_usb_string(const char *name, >> struct usb_gadget_strings *stringtab_dev) >> { >> @@ -52,6 +55,9 @@ struct gadget_info { >> char qw_sign[OS_STRING_QW_SIGN_LEN]; >> spinlock_t spinlock; >> bool unbind; >> + >> + /* Make driver names unique */ >> + int driver_id_number; >> }; >> static inline struct gadget_info *to_gadget_info(struct config_item >> *item) >> @@ -393,6 +399,8 @@ static void gadget_info_attr_release(struct >> config_item *item) >> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&gi->string_list)); >> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&gi->available_func)); >> kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.function); >> + kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name); >> + ida_free(&driver_id_numbers, gi->driver_id_number); >> kfree(gi); >> } >> @@ -1623,13 +1631,28 @@ static struct config_group *gadgets_make( >> gi->composite.gadget_driver = configfs_driver_template; >> + gi->driver_id_number = ida_alloc(&driver_id_numbers, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (gi->driver_id_number < 0) >> + goto err; >> + >> + gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, >> + "configfs-gadget.%d", >> + gi->driver_id_number); > > I'm wondering if it maybe makes more sense to use the gadget name as a > suffix > instead? > > gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name = > kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "configfs-gadget.%s" name); > > So that when you > > mkdir g1 > > you will ultimately see /sys/bus/gadget/drivers/configfs-gadget.g1 > > instead of /sys/bus/gadget/drivers/configfs-gadget.0 > > Gadget names are guaranteed to be unique because they are created > as sibling subdirectories in configfs. Your patch would then be greatly > simplified (no need for ida). > > Regards, > > Andrzej > Thanks, Andrzej! I'll update that in patch v3 >> + if (!gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name) >> + goto out_free_driver_id_number; >> + >> gi->composite.gadget_driver.function = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); >> gi->composite.name = gi->composite.gadget_driver.function; >> if (!gi->composite.gadget_driver.function) >> - goto err; >> + goto out_free_driver_name; >> return &gi->group; >> + >> +out_free_driver_name: >> + kfree(gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name); >> +out_free_driver_id_number: >> + ida_free(&driver_id_numbers, gi->driver_id_number); >> err: >> kfree(gi); >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >
> > I'm wondering if it maybe makes more sense to use the gadget name as a > suffix > instead? > > gi->composite.gadget_driver.driver.name = > kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "configfs-gadget.%s" name); > > So that when you > > mkdir g1 > > you will ultimately see /sys/bus/gadget/drivers/configfs-gadget.g1 > > instead of /sys/bus/gadget/drivers/configfs-gadget.0 > > Gadget names are guaranteed to be unique because they are created > as sibling subdirectories in configfs. Your patch would then be greatly > simplified (no need for ida). I vote this ways. Best regards Frank Li > > Regards, > > Andrzej >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.