crypto/wp512.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The memory sanitizer causes excessive register spills in this function:
crypto/wp512.c:782:13: error: stack frame size (2104) exceeds limit (2048) in 'wp512_process_buffer' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
Assume that this one is safe, and mark it as needing no checks to
get the stack usage back down to the normal level.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
crypto/wp512.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/crypto/wp512.c b/crypto/wp512.c
index 5e820afa3c78..07994e5ebf4e 100644
--- a/crypto/wp512.c
+++ b/crypto/wp512.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static const u64 rc[WHIRLPOOL_ROUNDS] = {
* The core Whirlpool transform.
*/
-static void wp512_process_buffer(struct wp512_ctx *wctx) {
+static __no_kmsan_checks void wp512_process_buffer(struct wp512_ctx *wctx) {
int i, r;
u64 K[8]; /* the round key */
u64 block[8]; /* mu(buffer) */
--
2.35.1
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:29:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > The memory sanitizer causes excessive register spills in this function: > > crypto/wp512.c:782:13: error: stack frame size (2104) exceeds limit (2048) in 'wp512_process_buffer' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] > > Assume that this one is safe, and mark it as needing no checks to > get the stack usage back down to the normal level. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > crypto/wp512.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Patch applied. Thanks. -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
> The memory sanitizer causes excessive register spills in this function: > crypto/wp512.c:782:13: error: stack frame size (2104) exceeds limit (2048) in 'wp512_process_buffer' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] > Assume that this one is safe, and mark it as needing no checks to > get the stack usage back down to the normal level. KMSAN indeed bloats the stack frames heavily. Wouldn't it be more preferable to further increase KMSAN's -Wframe-larger-than limit instead? It is not intended for production anyway, and detecting a runtime stack overflow in the debug mode should not be a problem.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022, at 17:08, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> The memory sanitizer causes excessive register spills in this function: > >> crypto/wp512.c:782:13: error: stack frame size (2104) exceeds limit (2048) in 'wp512_process_buffer' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] > >> Assume that this one is safe, and mark it as needing no checks to >> get the stack usage back down to the normal level. > > KMSAN indeed bloats the stack frames heavily. > Wouldn't it be more preferable to further increase KMSAN's > -Wframe-larger-than limit instead? > It is not intended for production anyway, and detecting a runtime stack > overflow in the debug mode should not be a problem. I don't actually see a lot of compiler warnings with KMSAN hitting the limit, I think we can deal with them individually. I'd rather not raise the limit more, as that makes it harder to identify functions that use more stack than they should. Arnd
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.