arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
By coding style, unit address should not start with 0x.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
index 1a257f672887..a63dbd12230f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
@@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ uart7: serial@89c000 {
};
};
- gpi_dma1: dma-controller@0xa00000 {
+ gpi_dma1: dma-controller@a00000 {
#dma-cells = <3>;
compatible = "qcom,sdm845-gpi-dma";
reg = <0 0x00a00000 0 0x60000>;
--
2.34.1
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:33:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > By coding style, unit address should not start with 0x. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: drop 0x from unit address commit: 1629063ec9d8a32111a63ce7250a7781376c492a Best regards, -- Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
On 10.12.2022 12:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > By coding style, unit address should not start with 0x. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- We somehow keep running into solving the same style issues :P https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220930191049.123256-8-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/ Konrad > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > index 1a257f672887..a63dbd12230f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > @@ -1636,7 +1636,7 @@ uart7: serial@89c000 { > }; > }; > > - gpi_dma1: dma-controller@0xa00000 { > + gpi_dma1: dma-controller@a00000 { > #dma-cells = <3>; > compatible = "qcom,sdm845-gpi-dma"; > reg = <0 0x00a00000 0 0x60000>;
On 10/12/2022 13:26, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > On 10.12.2022 12:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> By coding style, unit address should not start with 0x. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> --- > We somehow keep running into solving the same style issues :P > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220930191049.123256-8-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/ > Eh, this should have been just applied long time ago... Best regards, Krzysztof
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 09:15:36PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/12/2022 13:26, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > > > > On 10.12.2022 12:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> By coding style, unit address should not start with 0x. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >> --- > > We somehow keep running into solving the same style issues :P > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220930191049.123256-8-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org/ > > > > Eh, this should have been just applied long time ago... > That's patch 7 in a series, which I would be expecting to see respun per your request for changes. @Konrad, please put fixes like that first in your series - or just send them separate from the series. Regards, Bjorn
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.