[PATCH][next] ASoC: rt715: Make read-only arrays capture_reg_H and capture_reg_L static const

Colin Ian King posted 1 patch 1 year, 4 months ago
sound/soc/codecs/rt715.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
[PATCH][next] ASoC: rt715: Make read-only arrays capture_reg_H and capture_reg_L static const
Posted by Colin Ian King 1 year, 4 months ago
Don't populate the read-only arrays capture_reg_H and capture_reg_L
on the stack but instead make them static const. Also makes the
object code a little smaller.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/rt715.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt715.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt715.c
index 917a04092da2..1a2036ccfbac 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt715.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt715.c
@@ -204,12 +204,12 @@ static int rt715_set_main_switch_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
 		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
 	struct rt715_priv *rt715 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
-	unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H};
-	unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L};
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H };
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L };
 	unsigned int addr_h, addr_l, val_h = 0x0, val_ll, val_lr;
 	unsigned int k_shift = RT715_DIR_IN_SFT, k_changed = 0;
 	unsigned int read_ll, read_rl, i, j, loop_cnt = 4;
@@ -284,12 +284,12 @@ static int rt715_set_main_switch_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 {
 	struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
 	struct rt715_priv *rt715 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
-	unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H};
-	unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L};
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H };
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L };
 	unsigned int addr_h, addr_l, val_h = 0x0, i, loop_cnt = 4;
 	unsigned int read_ll, read_rl;
 
@@ -312,12 +312,12 @@ static int rt715_set_main_vol_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
 		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
 	struct rt715_priv *rt715 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
-	unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H};
-	unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L};
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H };
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L};
 	unsigned int addr_h, addr_l, val_h = 0x0, val_ll, val_lr;
 	unsigned int read_ll, read_rl, i, j, loop_cnt = 4, k_changed = 0;
 	unsigned int k_shift = RT715_DIR_IN_SFT, k_max = 0x3f;
@@ -393,12 +393,12 @@ static int rt715_set_main_vol_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 {
 	struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
 	struct rt715_priv *rt715 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
-	unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H};
-	unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L,
-		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L};
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_H[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_H,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_H, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_H };
+	static const unsigned int capture_reg_L[] = {
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIC_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_LINE_ADC_L,
+		RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC_L, RT715_SET_GAIN_MIX_ADC2_L };
 	unsigned int addr_h, addr_l, val_h = 0x0, i, loop_cnt = 4;
 	unsigned int read_ll, read_rl;
 
-- 
2.38.1
Re: [PATCH][next] ASoC: rt715: Make read-only arrays capture_reg_H and capture_reg_L static const
Posted by Mark Brown 1 year, 4 months ago
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 17:14:50 +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Don't populate the read-only arrays capture_reg_H and capture_reg_L
> on the stack but instead make them static const. Also makes the
> object code a little smaller.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: rt715: Make read-only arrays capture_reg_H and capture_reg_L static const
      commit: b5d5051971b44c9952b62f261509cf837b9d21ba

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark