A large page with mixed private/shared subpages can't be mapped as large
page since its sub private/shared pages are from different memory
backends and may also treated by architecture differently. When
private/shared memory are mixed in a large page, the current lpage_info
is not sufficient to decide whether the page can be mapped as large page
or not and additional private/shared mixed information is needed.

Tracking this 'mixed' information with the current 'count' like
disallow_lpage is a bit challenge so reserve a bit in 'disallow_lpage'
to indicate a large page has mixed private/share subpages and update
this 'mixed' bit whenever the memory attribute is changed between
private and shared.

Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   8 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |   2 +
 include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  19 +++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |   9 ++-
 5 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 283cbb83d6ae..7772ab37ac89 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
 
 #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VCPU_DEBUGFS
+#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
 
 #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
 
@@ -1011,6 +1012,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 #endif
 };
 
+/*
+ * Use a bit in disallow_lpage to indicate private/shared pages mixed at the
+ * level. The remaining bits are used as a reference count.
+ */
+#define KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED		(1U << 31)
+#define KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX			((1U << 31) - 1)
+
 struct kvm_lpage_info {
 	int disallow_lpage;
 };
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index e2c70b5afa3e..2190fd8c95c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 {
 	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
 	int i;
+	int disallow_count;
 
 	for (i = PG_LEVEL_2M; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
 		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
+
+		disallow_count = linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX;
+		WARN_ON(disallow_count + count < 0 ||
+			disallow_count > KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX - count);
+
 		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
-		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -6986,3 +6991,130 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 	if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
 		kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
 }
+
+static bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
+{
+	return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
+}
+
+static void linfo_set_mixed(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+			    int level, bool mixed)
+{
+	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
+
+	if (mixed)
+		linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
+	else
+		linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
+}
+
+static bool is_expected_attr_entry(void *entry, unsigned long expected_attrs)
+{
+	bool expect_private = expected_attrs & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
+
+	if (xa_to_value(entry) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE) {
+		if (!expect_private)
+			return false;
+	} else if (expect_private)
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool mem_attrs_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long attrs,
+			       gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
+	gfn_t gfn = start;
+	void *entry;
+	bool mixed = false;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	entry = xas_load(&xas);
+	while (gfn < end) {
+		if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
+			continue;
+
+		KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);
+
+		if (!is_expected_attr_entry(entry, attrs)) {
+			mixed = true;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		entry = xas_next(&xas);
+		gfn++;
+	}
+
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	return mixed;
+}
+
+static bool mem_attrs_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+			    int level, unsigned long attrs,
+			    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	unsigned long gfn;
+
+	if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
+		return mem_attrs_mixed_2m(kvm, attrs, start, end);
+
+	for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1))
+		if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
+		    !is_expected_attr_entry(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn),
+					    attrs))
+			return true;
+	return false;
+}
+
+static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
+						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+						  unsigned long attrs,
+						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	unsigned long pages, mask;
+	gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
+	int level;
+	bool mixed;
+
+	/*
+	 * The sequence matters here: we set the higher level basing on the
+	 * lower level's scanning result.
+	 */
+	for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
+		pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
+		mask = ~(pages - 1);
+		first = start & mask;
+		last = (end - 1) & mask;
+
+		/*
+		 * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
+		 * we know they will not be mixed.
+		 */
+		gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
+		gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
+		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
+		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
+
+		if (first == last)
+			return;
+
+		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
+			linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
+
+		gfn = last;
+		gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
+		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
+		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
+	}
+}
+
+void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
+				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+				    unsigned long attrs,
+				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
+		kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(kvm, slot, attrs,
+						      start, end);
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
 		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
 			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
 		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
+			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 		/*
 		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
 		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 3331c0c92838..25099c94e770 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -592,6 +592,11 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
 	struct restrictedmem_notifier notifier;
 };
 
+static inline bool kvm_slot_can_be_private(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
+{
+	return slot && (slot->flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
+}
+
 static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
 {
 	return slot->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
@@ -2316,4 +2321,18 @@ static inline void kvm_account_pgtable_pages(void *virt, int nr)
 /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
 #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
 
+#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
+void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
+				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+				    unsigned long attrs,
+				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
+#else
+static inline void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
+						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+						  unsigned long attrs,
+						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+}
+#endif /* __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES */
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 4e1e1e113bf0..e107afea32f0 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2354,7 +2354,8 @@ static u64 kvm_supported_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
+				unsigned long attrs)
 {
 	struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range;
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
@@ -2378,6 +2379,10 @@ static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
 			gfn_range.slot = slot;
 
 			r |= kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, &gfn_range);
+
+			kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(kvm, slot, attrs,
+						       gfn_range.start,
+						       gfn_range.end);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2427,7 +2432,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
 		idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
 		KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
 		if (i > start)
-			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i);
+			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i, attrs->attributes);
 		kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm);
 		KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
 		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
-- 
2.25.1

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
>  			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
>  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> +			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		/*
>  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
>  		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.

Forgot to talk about the bug.  This code needs to handle the scenario where a
memslot is created with existing, non-uniform attributes.  It might be a bit ugly
(I didn't even try to write the code), but it's definitely possible, and since
memslot updates are already slow I think it's best to handle things here.

In the meantime, I added this so we don't forget to fix it before merging.

#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
	pr_crit_once("FIXME: Walk the memory attributes of the slot and set the mixed status appropriately");
#endif

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:16:27PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
> >  			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
> >  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> > +			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >  		/*
> >  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
> >  		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
> 
> Forgot to talk about the bug.  This code needs to handle the scenario where a
> memslot is created with existing, non-uniform attributes.  It might be a bit ugly
> (I didn't even try to write the code), but it's definitely possible, and since
> memslot updates are already slow I think it's best to handle things here.
> 
> In the meantime, I added this so we don't forget to fix it before merging.
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> 	pr_crit_once("FIXME: Walk the memory attributes of the slot and set the mixed status appropriately");
> #endif

Here is the code to fix (based on your latest github repo).

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index e552374f2357..609ff1cba9c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -2195,4 +2195,9 @@ int memslot_rmap_alloc(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, unsigned long npages);
 	 KVM_X86_QUIRK_FIX_HYPERCALL_INSN |	\
 	 KVM_X86_QUIRK_MWAIT_NEVER_UD_FAULTS)
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
+void kvm_memory_attributes_create_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
+					  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
+#endif
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_KVM_HOST_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index eda615f3951c..8833d7201e41 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -7201,10 +7201,11 @@ static bool has_mixed_attrs(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 	return false;
 }
 
-void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
-				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-				    unsigned long attrs,
-				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+static void kvm_update_lpage_mixed_flag(struct kvm *kvm,
+					struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+					bool set_attrs,
+					unsigned long attrs,
+					gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
 {
 	unsigned long pages, mask;
 	gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
@@ -7231,25 +7232,53 @@ void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
 		first = start & mask;
 		last = (end - 1) & mask;
 
-		/*
-		 * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
-		 * we know they will not be mixed.
-		 */
+		/* head page */
 		gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
 		gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
+		if(!set_attrs)
+			attrs = kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn);
 		mixed = has_mixed_attrs(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
 		linfo_update_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
 
 		if (first == last)
 			return;
 
-		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
-			linfo_update_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
+		/* middle pages */
+		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages) {
+			if (set_attrs) {
+				mixed = false;
+			} else {
+				gfn_end = gfn + pages;
+				attrs = kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn);
+				mixed = has_mixed_attrs(kvm, slot, level, attrs,
+							gfn, gfn_end);
+			}
+			linfo_update_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
+		}
 
+		/* tail page */
 		gfn = last;
 		gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
+		if(!set_attrs)
+			attrs = kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn);
 		mixed = has_mixed_attrs(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
 		linfo_update_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
 	}
 }
+
+void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
+				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+				    unsigned long attrs,
+				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
+{
+	kvm_update_lpage_mixed_flag(kvm, slot, true, attrs, start, end);
+}
+
+void kvm_memory_attributes_create_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
+					  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
+{
+
+	kvm_update_lpage_mixed_flag(kvm, slot, false, 0, slot->base_gfn,
+				    slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
+}
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 268c3d16894d..c1074aecf2d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -12443,7 +12443,7 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
-	pr_crit_once("FIXME: Walk the memory attributes of the slot and set the mixed status appropriately");
+	kvm_memory_attributes_create_memslot(kvm, slot);
 #endif
 
 	if (kvm_page_track_create_memslot(kvm, slot, npages))

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 283cbb83d6ae..7772ab37ac89 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
>  
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VCPU_DEBUGFS
> +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES

No need for this, I think we should just make it mandatory to implement the
arch hook when CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES=y.  If another arch gains
support for mem attributes and doesn't need the hook, then we can simply add a
weak helper (or maybe add a #define then if we feel that's the way to go).

>  #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
>  
> @@ -1011,6 +1012,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Use a bit in disallow_lpage to indicate private/shared pages mixed at the
> + * level. The remaining bits are used as a reference count.
> + */
> +#define KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED		(1U << 31)

Similar to the need to unmap, I think we should just say "mixed" and ignore the
private vs. shared, i.e. make this a flag for all memory attributes.

> +#define KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX			((1U << 31) - 1)

"MAX" is technically correct, but it's more of a mask.  I think we can make it a
moot point though.  There's no need to mask the count, we just want to assert that
adjusting the counting doesn't change the flag.

I would also say throw these defines into mmu.c, at least pending the bug fix
for kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata() (more on that below).

>  struct kvm_lpage_info {
>  	int disallow_lpage;
>  };
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index e2c70b5afa3e..2190fd8c95c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>  {
>  	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
>  	int i;
> +	int disallow_count;
>  
>  	for (i = PG_LEVEL_2M; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
>  		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> +
> +		disallow_count = linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX;
> +		WARN_ON(disallow_count + count < 0 ||
> +			disallow_count > KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX - count);
> +
>  		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> -		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);

It's been a long week so don't trust my math, but I believe this can simply be:

		old = linfo->disallow_lpage;
		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;

		WARN_ON_ONCE((old ^ linfo->disallow_lpage) & KVM_LPAGE_MIXED_FLAG);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -6986,3 +6991,130 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
>  		kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
>  }
> +
> +static bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
> +{
> +	return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> +}
> +
> +static void linfo_set_mixed(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +			    int level, bool mixed)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
> +
> +	if (mixed)
> +		linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> +	else
> +		linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_expected_attr_entry(void *entry, unsigned long expected_attrs)
> +{
> +	bool expect_private = expected_attrs & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> +
> +	if (xa_to_value(entry) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE) {
> +		if (!expect_private)
> +			return false;
> +	} else if (expect_private)
> +		return false;

This is messy.  If we drop the private vs. shared specifity, this can go away if
we add a helper to get attributes

	static inline unsigned long kvm_get_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
	{
		return xa_to_value(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn));
	}

and then we can do


		if (KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm) ||
		    attrs != kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn)) {
			mixed = true;
			break;
		}

and

		if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
		    attrs != kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn))
			return true;


> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool mem_attrs_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long attrs,
> +			       gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> +	gfn_t gfn = start;
> +	void *entry;
> +	bool mixed = false;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	entry = xas_load(&xas);
> +	while (gfn < end) {
> +		if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);

As above, I think it's worth bailing immediately if there's a mismatch.

> +
> +		if (!is_expected_attr_entry(entry, attrs)) {
> +			mixed = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		entry = xas_next(&xas);
> +		gfn++;
> +	}
> +
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return mixed;
> +}
> +
> +static bool mem_attrs_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,

s/mem_attrs_mixed/has_mixed_attrs to make it clear this is querying, not setting.
And has_mixed_attrs_2m() above.

> +			    int level, unsigned long attrs,
> +			    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	unsigned long gfn;
> +
> +	if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> +		return mem_attrs_mixed_2m(kvm, attrs, start, end);
> +
> +	for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1))

Curly braces needed on the for-loop.

> +		if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
> +		    !is_expected_attr_entry(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn),
> +					    attrs))
> +			return true;
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
> +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +						  unsigned long attrs,
> +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pages, mask;
> +	gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
> +	int level;
> +	bool mixed;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The sequence matters here: we set the higher level basing on the
> +	 * lower level's scanning result.
> +	 */
> +	for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
> +		pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
> +		mask = ~(pages - 1);
> +		first = start & mask;
> +		last = (end - 1) & mask;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
> +		 * we know they will not be mixed.
> +		 */
> +		gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
> +		gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> +
> +		if (first == last)
> +			return;
> +
> +		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
> +			linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
> +
> +		gfn = last;
> +		gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +				    unsigned long attrs,
> +				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))

Make this an early return optimization, with a comment explaining that KVM x86
doesn't yet support other attributes.

	/*
	 * KVM x86 currently only supports KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE, skip
	 * the slot if the slot will never consume the PRIVATE attribute.
	 */
	if (!kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
		return;


> +		kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(kvm, slot, attrs,
> +						      start, end);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
>  			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
>  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> +			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;

I would rather reject memslot if the gfn has lesser alignment than the offset.
I'm totally ok with this approach _if_ there's a use case.  Until such a use case
presents itself, I would rather be conservative from a uAPI perspective.

>  		/*
>  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
>  		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 3331c0c92838..25099c94e770 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -592,6 +592,11 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
>  	struct restrictedmem_notifier notifier;
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_slot_can_be_private(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> +	return slot && (slot->flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);

KVM_MEM_PRIVATE should really be defined only when private memory is exposed to
userspace.  For this patch, even though it means we have untestable code, I think
it makes sense to "return false".

> +}
> +
>  static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>  {
>  	return slot->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> @@ -2316,4 +2321,18 @@ static inline void kvm_account_pgtable_pages(void *virt, int nr)
>  /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
>  #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
>  
> +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +				    unsigned long attrs,
> +				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
> +#else
> +static inline void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +						  unsigned long attrs,
> +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES */

As above, no stub is necessary.

>  #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 4e1e1e113bf0..e107afea32f0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2354,7 +2354,8 @@ static u64 kvm_supported_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)

Feedback for an earlier patch (to avoid churn): this should be kvm_mem_attrs_changed()
or so now that this does more than just unmap.

> +static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> +				unsigned long attrs)

Weird nit.  I think we should keep the prototypes for kvm_mem_attrs_changed()
and kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes() somewhat similar, i.e. squeeze in @attrs
before @start.

>  {
>  	struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range;
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> @@ -2378,6 +2379,10 @@ static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
>  			gfn_range.slot = slot;
>  
>  			r |= kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, &gfn_range);
> +
> +			kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(kvm, slot, attrs,
> +						       gfn_range.start,
> +						       gfn_range.end);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2427,7 +2432,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
>  		KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
>  		if (i > start)
> -			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i);
> +			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i, attrs->attributes);
>  		kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm);
>  		KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
>  		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:13:45PM +0800,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> A large page with mixed private/shared subpages can't be mapped as large
> page since its sub private/shared pages are from different memory
> backends and may also treated by architecture differently. When
> private/shared memory are mixed in a large page, the current lpage_info
> is not sufficient to decide whether the page can be mapped as large page
> or not and additional private/shared mixed information is needed.
> 
> Tracking this 'mixed' information with the current 'count' like
> disallow_lpage is a bit challenge so reserve a bit in 'disallow_lpage'
> to indicate a large page has mixed private/share subpages and update
> this 'mixed' bit whenever the memory attribute is changed between
> private and shared.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   8 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |   2 +
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  19 +++++
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |   9 ++-
>  5 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 283cbb83d6ae..7772ab37ac89 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
>  
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VCPU_DEBUGFS
> +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
>  
>  #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
>  
> @@ -1011,6 +1012,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Use a bit in disallow_lpage to indicate private/shared pages mixed at the
> + * level. The remaining bits are used as a reference count.
> + */
> +#define KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED		(1U << 31)
> +#define KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX			((1U << 31) - 1)
> +
>  struct kvm_lpage_info {
>  	int disallow_lpage;
>  };
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index e2c70b5afa3e..2190fd8c95c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>  {
>  	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
>  	int i;
> +	int disallow_count;
>  
>  	for (i = PG_LEVEL_2M; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
>  		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> +
> +		disallow_count = linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX;
> +		WARN_ON(disallow_count + count < 0 ||
> +			disallow_count > KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX - count);
> +
>  		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> -		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -6986,3 +6991,130 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
>  		kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
>  }
> +
> +static bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
> +{
> +	return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> +}
> +
> +static void linfo_set_mixed(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +			    int level, bool mixed)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
> +
> +	if (mixed)
> +		linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> +	else
> +		linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_expected_attr_entry(void *entry, unsigned long expected_attrs)
> +{
> +	bool expect_private = expected_attrs & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> +
> +	if (xa_to_value(entry) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE) {
> +		if (!expect_private)
> +			return false;
> +	} else if (expect_private)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool mem_attrs_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long attrs,
> +			       gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> +	gfn_t gfn = start;
> +	void *entry;
> +	bool mixed = false;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	entry = xas_load(&xas);
> +	while (gfn < end) {
> +		if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);
> +
> +		if (!is_expected_attr_entry(entry, attrs)) {
> +			mixed = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		entry = xas_next(&xas);
> +		gfn++;
> +	}
> +
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return mixed;
> +}
> +
> +static bool mem_attrs_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +			    int level, unsigned long attrs,
> +			    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	unsigned long gfn;
> +
> +	if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> +		return mem_attrs_mixed_2m(kvm, attrs, start, end);
> +
> +	for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1))
> +		if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
> +		    !is_expected_attr_entry(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn),
> +					    attrs))
> +			return true;
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
> +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +						  unsigned long attrs,
> +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	unsigned long pages, mask;
> +	gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
> +	int level;
> +	bool mixed;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The sequence matters here: we set the higher level basing on the
> +	 * lower level's scanning result.
> +	 */
> +	for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
> +		pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
> +		mask = ~(pages - 1);
> +		first = start & mask;
> +		last = (end - 1) & mask;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
> +		 * we know they will not be mixed.
> +		 */
> +		gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
> +		gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> +
> +		if (first == last)
> +			return;


continue.

> +
> +		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
> +			linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
> +
> +		gfn = last;
> +		gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);

if (gfn == gfn_end) continue.


> +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +				    unsigned long attrs,
> +				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +	if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> +		kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(kvm, slot, attrs,
> +						      start, end);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
>  			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
>  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> +			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;

Is there any alignment restriction? If no, It should be +=.
In practice, alignment will hold though.

Thanks,

>  		/*
>  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
>  		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 3331c0c92838..25099c94e770 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -592,6 +592,11 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
>  	struct restrictedmem_notifier notifier;
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_slot_can_be_private(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> +	return slot && (slot->flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
>  {
>  	return slot->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> @@ -2316,4 +2321,18 @@ static inline void kvm_account_pgtable_pages(void *virt, int nr)
>  /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
>  #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
>  
> +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +				    unsigned long attrs,
> +				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
> +#else
> +static inline void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +						  unsigned long attrs,
> +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES */
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 4e1e1e113bf0..e107afea32f0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2354,7 +2354,8 @@ static u64 kvm_supported_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> +				unsigned long attrs)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range;
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> @@ -2378,6 +2379,10 @@ static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
>  			gfn_range.slot = slot;
>  
>  			r |= kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, &gfn_range);
> +
> +			kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(kvm, slot, attrs,
> +						       gfn_range.start,
> +						       gfn_range.end);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2427,7 +2432,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
>  		KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
>  		if (i > start)
> -			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i);
> +			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i, attrs->attributes);
>  		kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm);
>  		KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
>  		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 02:49:59PM -0800, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:13:45PM +0800,
> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > A large page with mixed private/shared subpages can't be mapped as large
> > page since its sub private/shared pages are from different memory
> > backends and may also treated by architecture differently. When
> > private/shared memory are mixed in a large page, the current lpage_info
> > is not sufficient to decide whether the page can be mapped as large page
> > or not and additional private/shared mixed information is needed.
> > 
> > Tracking this 'mixed' information with the current 'count' like
> > disallow_lpage is a bit challenge so reserve a bit in 'disallow_lpage'
> > to indicate a large page has mixed private/share subpages and update
> > this 'mixed' bit whenever the memory attribute is changed between
> > private and shared.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   8 ++
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |   2 +
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  19 +++++
> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |   9 ++-
> >  5 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 283cbb83d6ae..7772ab37ac89 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
> >  
> >  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VCPU_DEBUGFS
> > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> >  
> >  #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> >  
> > @@ -1011,6 +1012,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> >  #endif
> >  };
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Use a bit in disallow_lpage to indicate private/shared pages mixed at the
> > + * level. The remaining bits are used as a reference count.
> > + */
> > +#define KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED		(1U << 31)
> > +#define KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX			((1U << 31) - 1)
> > +
> >  struct kvm_lpage_info {
> >  	int disallow_lpage;
> >  };
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index e2c70b5afa3e..2190fd8c95c0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> >  	int i;
> > +	int disallow_count;
> >  
> >  	for (i = PG_LEVEL_2M; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> >  		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> > +
> > +		disallow_count = linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX;
> > +		WARN_ON(disallow_count + count < 0 ||
> > +			disallow_count > KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX - count);
> > +
> >  		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> > -		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -6986,3 +6991,130 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  	if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> >  		kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> >  }
> > +
> > +static bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
> > +{
> > +	return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void linfo_set_mixed(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +			    int level, bool mixed)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
> > +
> > +	if (mixed)
> > +		linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > +	else
> > +		linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool is_expected_attr_entry(void *entry, unsigned long expected_attrs)
> > +{
> > +	bool expect_private = expected_attrs & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> > +
> > +	if (xa_to_value(entry) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE) {
> > +		if (!expect_private)
> > +			return false;
> > +	} else if (expect_private)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long attrs,
> > +			       gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > +	XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> > +	gfn_t gfn = start;
> > +	void *entry;
> > +	bool mixed = false;
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	entry = xas_load(&xas);
> > +	while (gfn < end) {
> > +		if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);
> > +
> > +		if (!is_expected_attr_entry(entry, attrs)) {
> > +			mixed = true;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		entry = xas_next(&xas);
> > +		gfn++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > +	return mixed;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +			    int level, unsigned long attrs,
> > +			    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long gfn;
> > +
> > +	if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> > +		return mem_attrs_mixed_2m(kvm, attrs, start, end);
> > +
> > +	for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1))
> > +		if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
> > +		    !is_expected_attr_entry(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn),
> > +					    attrs))
> > +			return true;
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +						  unsigned long attrs,
> > +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long pages, mask;
> > +	gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
> > +	int level;
> > +	bool mixed;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The sequence matters here: we set the higher level basing on the
> > +	 * lower level's scanning result.
> > +	 */
> > +	for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
> > +		pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
> > +		mask = ~(pages - 1);
> > +		first = start & mask;
> > +		last = (end - 1) & mask;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
> > +		 * we know they will not be mixed.
> > +		 */
> > +		gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
> > +		gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> > +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> > +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> > +
> > +		if (first == last)
> > +			return;
> 
> 
> continue.

Ya!

> 
> > +
> > +		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
> > +			linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
> > +
> > +		gfn = last;
> > +		gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> 
> if (gfn == gfn_end) continue.

Do you see a case where gfn can equal to gfn_end? Though it does not
hurt to add a check.

> 
> 
> > +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> > +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +				    unsigned long attrs,
> > +				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > +	if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> > +		kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(kvm, slot, attrs,
> > +						      start, end);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
> >  			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
> >  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> > +			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> 
> Is there any alignment restriction? If no, It should be +=.
> In practice, alignment will hold though.

All we need here is checking whether both userspace_addr and
restricted_offset are aligned to HPAGE_SIZE or not. '+=' actually can
yield wrong value in cases when userspace_addr + restricted_offset is
aligned to HPAGE_SIZE but individually they may not align to HPAGE_SIZE.

Thanks,
Chao
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >  		/*
> >  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
> >  		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 3331c0c92838..25099c94e770 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -592,6 +592,11 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
> >  	struct restrictedmem_notifier notifier;
> >  };
> >  
> > +static inline bool kvm_slot_can_be_private(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> > +{
> > +	return slot && (slot->flags & KVM_MEM_PRIVATE);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline bool kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> >  {
> >  	return slot->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
> > @@ -2316,4 +2321,18 @@ static inline void kvm_account_pgtable_pages(void *virt, int nr)
> >  /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */
> >  #define  KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES  65536
> >  
> > +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> > +void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +				    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +				    unsigned long attrs,
> > +				    gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
> > +#else
> > +static inline void kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +						  unsigned long attrs,
> > +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +#endif /* __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES */
> > +
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index 4e1e1e113bf0..e107afea32f0 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -2354,7 +2354,8 @@ static u64 kvm_supported_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > +static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
> > +				unsigned long attrs)
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range;
> >  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> > @@ -2378,6 +2379,10 @@ static void kvm_unmap_mem_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> >  			gfn_range.slot = slot;
> >  
> >  			r |= kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, &gfn_range);
> > +
> > +			kvm_arch_set_memory_attributes(kvm, slot, attrs,
> > +						       gfn_range.start,
> > +						       gfn_range.end);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -2427,7 +2432,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> >  		idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> >  		KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
> >  		if (i > start)
> > -			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i);
> > +			kvm_unmap_mem_range(kvm, start, i, attrs->attributes);
> >  		kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm);
> >  		KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
> >  		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:02:24PM +0800,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 02:49:59PM -0800, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:13:45PM +0800,
> > Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > A large page with mixed private/shared subpages can't be mapped as large
> > > page since its sub private/shared pages are from different memory
> > > backends and may also treated by architecture differently. When
> > > private/shared memory are mixed in a large page, the current lpage_info
> > > is not sufficient to decide whether the page can be mapped as large page
> > > or not and additional private/shared mixed information is needed.
> > > 
> > > Tracking this 'mixed' information with the current 'count' like
> > > disallow_lpage is a bit challenge so reserve a bit in 'disallow_lpage'
> > > to indicate a large page has mixed private/share subpages and update
> > > this 'mixed' bit whenever the memory attribute is changed between
> > > private and shared.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   8 ++
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |   2 +
> > >  include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  19 +++++
> > >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |   9 ++-
> > >  5 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > index 283cbb83d6ae..7772ab37ac89 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> > >  #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
> > >  
> > >  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VCPU_DEBUGFS
> > > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> > >  
> > >  #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> > >  
> > > @@ -1011,6 +1012,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > >  #endif
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +/*
> > > + * Use a bit in disallow_lpage to indicate private/shared pages mixed at the
> > > + * level. The remaining bits are used as a reference count.
> > > + */
> > > +#define KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED		(1U << 31)
> > > +#define KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX			((1U << 31) - 1)
> > > +
> > >  struct kvm_lpage_info {
> > >  	int disallow_lpage;
> > >  };
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > index e2c70b5afa3e..2190fd8c95c0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > @@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > >  {
> > >  	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> > >  	int i;
> > > +	int disallow_count;
> > >  
> > >  	for (i = PG_LEVEL_2M; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> > >  		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> > > +
> > > +		disallow_count = linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX;
> > > +		WARN_ON(disallow_count + count < 0 ||
> > > +			disallow_count > KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX - count);
> > > +
> > >  		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> > > -		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > @@ -6986,3 +6991,130 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> > >  	if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> > >  		kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +static bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
> > > +{
> > > +	return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void linfo_set_mixed(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > > +			    int level, bool mixed)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
> > > +
> > > +	if (mixed)
> > > +		linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > > +	else
> > > +		linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool is_expected_attr_entry(void *entry, unsigned long expected_attrs)
> > > +{
> > > +	bool expect_private = expected_attrs & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> > > +
> > > +	if (xa_to_value(entry) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE) {
> > > +		if (!expect_private)
> > > +			return false;
> > > +	} else if (expect_private)
> > > +		return false;
> > > +
> > > +	return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long attrs,
> > > +			       gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > > +{
> > > +	XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> > > +	gfn_t gfn = start;
> > > +	void *entry;
> > > +	bool mixed = false;
> > > +
> > > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > > +	entry = xas_load(&xas);
> > > +	while (gfn < end) {
> > > +		if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);
> > > +
> > > +		if (!is_expected_attr_entry(entry, attrs)) {
> > > +			mixed = true;
> > > +			break;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		entry = xas_next(&xas);
> > > +		gfn++;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > > +	return mixed;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > > +			    int level, unsigned long attrs,
> > > +			    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > > +{
> > > +	unsigned long gfn;
> > > +
> > > +	if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> > > +		return mem_attrs_mixed_2m(kvm, attrs, start, end);
> > > +
> > > +	for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1))
> > > +		if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
> > > +		    !is_expected_attr_entry(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn),
> > > +					    attrs))
> > > +			return true;
> > > +	return false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > > +						  unsigned long attrs,
> > > +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > > +{
> > > +	unsigned long pages, mask;
> > > +	gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
> > > +	int level;
> > > +	bool mixed;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * The sequence matters here: we set the higher level basing on the
> > > +	 * lower level's scanning result.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
> > > +		pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
> > > +		mask = ~(pages - 1);
> > > +		first = start & mask;
> > > +		last = (end - 1) & mask;
> > > +
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
> > > +		 * we know they will not be mixed.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
> > > +		gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> > > +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> > > +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> > > +
> > > +		if (first == last)
> > > +			return;
> > 
> > 
> > continue.
> 
> Ya!
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > > +		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
> > > +			linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
> > > +
> > > +		gfn = last;
> > > +		gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> > 
> > if (gfn == gfn_end) continue.
> 
> Do you see a case where gfn can equal to gfn_end? Though it does not
> hurt to add a check.

If last == base_gfn + npages, gfn == gfn_end can occur.


> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
> > >  		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
> > >  			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
> > >  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > +		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> > > +			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > 
> > Is there any alignment restriction? If no, It should be +=.
> > In practice, alignment will hold though.
> 
> All we need here is checking whether both userspace_addr and
> restricted_offset are aligned to HPAGE_SIZE or not. '+=' actually can
> yield wrong value in cases when userspace_addr + restricted_offset is
> aligned to HPAGE_SIZE but individually they may not align to HPAGE_SIZE.

Ah, got it. The blow comment explains it.

> Thanks,
> Chao
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
> > >  		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 10:42:24PM -0800, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 08:02:24PM +0800,
> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 02:49:59PM -0800, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:13:45PM +0800,
> > > Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > A large page with mixed private/shared subpages can't be mapped as large
> > > > page since its sub private/shared pages are from different memory
> > > > backends and may also treated by architecture differently. When
> > > > private/shared memory are mixed in a large page, the current lpage_info
> > > > is not sufficient to decide whether the page can be mapped as large page
> > > > or not and additional private/shared mixed information is needed.
> > > > 
> > > > Tracking this 'mixed' information with the current 'count' like
> > > > disallow_lpage is a bit challenge so reserve a bit in 'disallow_lpage'
> > > > to indicate a large page has mixed private/share subpages and update
> > > > this 'mixed' bit whenever the memory attribute is changed between
> > > > private and shared.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |   8 ++
> > > >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |   2 +
> > > >  include/linux/kvm_host.h        |  19 +++++
> > > >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |   9 ++-
> > > >  5 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > index 283cbb83d6ae..7772ab37ac89 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> > > >  #include <asm/hyperv-tlfs.h>
> > > >  
> > > >  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VCPU_DEBUGFS
> > > > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> > > >  
> > > >  #define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 1024
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1011,6 +1012,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > > >  #endif
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Use a bit in disallow_lpage to indicate private/shared pages mixed at the
> > > > + * level. The remaining bits are used as a reference count.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED		(1U << 31)
> > > > +#define KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX			((1U << 31) - 1)
> > > > +
> > > >  struct kvm_lpage_info {
> > > >  	int disallow_lpage;
> > > >  };
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > > index e2c70b5afa3e..2190fd8c95c0 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > > > @@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> > > >  	int i;
> > > > +	int disallow_count;
> > > >  
> > > >  	for (i = PG_LEVEL_2M; i <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> > > >  		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> > > > +
> > > > +		disallow_count = linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX;
> > > > +		WARN_ON(disallow_count + count < 0 ||
> > > > +			disallow_count > KVM_LPAGE_COUNT_MAX - count);
> > > > +
> > > >  		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> > > > -		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> > > >  	}
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -6986,3 +6991,130 @@ void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> > > >  	if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> > > >  		kthread_stop(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> > > >  }
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool linfo_is_mixed(struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return linfo->disallow_lpage & KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void linfo_set_mixed(gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > > > +			    int level, bool mixed)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (mixed)
> > > > +		linfo->disallow_lpage |= KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > > > +	else
> > > > +		linfo->disallow_lpage &= ~KVM_LPAGE_PRIVATE_SHARED_MIXED;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool is_expected_attr_entry(void *entry, unsigned long expected_attrs)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	bool expect_private = expected_attrs & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (xa_to_value(entry) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE) {
> > > > +		if (!expect_private)
> > > > +			return false;
> > > > +	} else if (expect_private)
> > > > +		return false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	return true;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed_2m(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long attrs,
> > > > +			       gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	XA_STATE(xas, &kvm->mem_attr_array, start);
> > > > +	gfn_t gfn = start;
> > > > +	void *entry;
> > > > +	bool mixed = false;
> > > > +
> > > > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > > > +	entry = xas_load(&xas);
> > > > +	while (gfn < end) {
> > > > +		if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +		KVM_BUG_ON(gfn != xas.xa_index, kvm);
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (!is_expected_attr_entry(entry, attrs)) {
> > > > +			mixed = true;
> > > > +			break;
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		entry = xas_next(&xas);
> > > > +		gfn++;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > > > +	return mixed;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool mem_attrs_mixed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > > > +			    int level, unsigned long attrs,
> > > > +			    gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	unsigned long gfn;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (level == PG_LEVEL_2M)
> > > > +		return mem_attrs_mixed_2m(kvm, attrs, start, end);
> > > > +
> > > > +	for (gfn = start; gfn < end; gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1))
> > > > +		if (linfo_is_mixed(lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level - 1)) ||
> > > > +		    !is_expected_attr_entry(xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn),
> > > > +					    attrs))
> > > > +			return true;
> > > > +	return false;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void kvm_update_lpage_private_shared_mixed(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > > +						  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > > > +						  unsigned long attrs,
> > > > +						  gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	unsigned long pages, mask;
> > > > +	gfn_t gfn, gfn_end, first, last;
> > > > +	int level;
> > > > +	bool mixed;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * The sequence matters here: we set the higher level basing on the
> > > > +	 * lower level's scanning result.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	for (level = PG_LEVEL_2M; level <= KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level++) {
> > > > +		pages = KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
> > > > +		mask = ~(pages - 1);
> > > > +		first = start & mask;
> > > > +		last = (end - 1) & mask;
> > > > +
> > > > +		/*
> > > > +		 * We only need to scan the head and tail page, for middle pages
> > > > +		 * we know they will not be mixed.
> > > > +		 */
> > > > +		gfn = max(first, slot->base_gfn);
> > > > +		gfn_end = min(first + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> > > > +		mixed = mem_attrs_mixed(kvm, slot, level, attrs, gfn, gfn_end);
> > > > +		linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, mixed);
> > > > +
> > > > +		if (first == last)
> > > > +			return;
> > > 
> > > 
> > > continue.
> > 
> > Ya!
> > 
> > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +		for (gfn = first + pages; gfn < last; gfn += pages)
> > > > +			linfo_set_mixed(gfn, slot, level, false);
> > > > +
> > > > +		gfn = last;
> > > > +		gfn_end = min(last + pages, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);
> > > 
> > > if (gfn == gfn_end) continue.
> > 
> > Do you see a case where gfn can equal to gfn_end? Though it does not
> > hurt to add a check.
> 
> If last == base_gfn + npages, gfn == gfn_end can occur.

'end' is guaranteed <=  base_gfn + npages in kvm_unmap_mem_range():
	gfn_range.end = min(end, slot->base_gfn + slot->npages);

And 'last' is defined as:
	last = (end - 1) & mask;

Then the math is:
	last = (end - 1) & mask
	     <= end - 1
	     <= base_gfn + npages - 1
	     <  base_gfn + npages

Thanks,
Chao
> 
> 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > index 9a07380f8d3c..5aefcff614d2 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > > @@ -12362,6 +12362,8 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm,
> > > >  		if ((slot->base_gfn + npages) & (KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level) - 1))
> > > >  			linfo[lpages - 1].disallow_lpage = 1;
> > > >  		ugfn = slot->userspace_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > +		if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot))
> > > > +			ugfn |= slot->restricted_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > 
> > > Is there any alignment restriction? If no, It should be +=.
> > > In practice, alignment will hold though.
> > 
> > All we need here is checking whether both userspace_addr and
> > restricted_offset are aligned to HPAGE_SIZE or not. '+=' actually can
> > yield wrong value in cases when userspace_addr + restricted_offset is
> > aligned to HPAGE_SIZE but individually they may not align to HPAGE_SIZE.
> 
> Ah, got it. The blow comment explains it.
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Chao
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > >  		/*
> > > >  		 * If the gfn and userspace address are not aligned wrt each
> > > >  		 * other, disable large page support for this slot.
> -- 
> Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>