From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>

Replace the open-code with device_match_of_node().

Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
index 3ed74aa4b44b..307a0adf6bc1 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
@@ -115,11 +115,11 @@ void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)

 static int of_dev_or_parent_node_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
 {
-	if (dev->of_node == data)
+	if (device_match_of_node(dev, data))
 		return 1;

 	if (dev->parent)
-		return dev->parent->of_node == data;
+		return device_match_of_node(dev->parent, data);

 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.25.1

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 03:51:03PM +0800, ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Replace the open-code with device_match_of_node().

Frankly, I don't like it. It doesn't look more readable and it doesn't
prevent from subtle bugs. device_match_of_node() was introduced when you
are *iterating* over a list of devices, see the commit which introduced
it. I think replacing every 'open coded' version with this helper is a
bad idea.

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram

> 
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
> index 3ed74aa4b44b..307a0adf6bc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c
> @@ -115,11 +115,11 @@ void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> 
>  static int of_dev_or_parent_node_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>  {
> -	if (dev->of_node == data)
> +	if (device_match_of_node(dev, data))
>  		return 1;
> 
>  	if (dev->parent)
> -		return dev->parent->of_node == data;
> +		return device_match_of_node(dev->parent, data);
> 
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.25.1